Documentation of hybridization between Californian cypresses: Cupressus macnabiana x sargentii

Systematic Botany

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 825-833

  Little, Damon P ^a  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CUPRESSUS; CUPRESSUS MACNABIANA; CUPRESSUS SARGENTII;

EID: 8844251545     PISSN: 03636445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1600/0363644042451026     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. ADAMS, R. and D. SIMMONS. 1987. A chemosystematic study of Callitris (Cupressaceae) in south-eastern Australia using volatile oils. Australian Forest Research 17: 115-125.
2. ADAMS, R. P. 1982. A comparison of multivariate methods for the detection of hybridization. Taxon 31: 646-661.
3. _. 1994. Geographic variation and systematics of monospermous Juniperus (Cupressaceae) from the Chihuahua Desert based on RAPDs and terpenes. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 22: 698-710.
4. _ and J. R. KISTLER. 1991. Hybridization between Juniperus erythrocarpa Cory and Juniperus pinchotii Sudworth in the Chisos Mountains, Texas. Southwestern Naturalist 36: 295-301.
5. _, A. E. SCHWARZBACH, and R. N. PANDEY. 2003. The concordance of terpenoid, ISSR and RAPD markers, and ITS sequence data sets among genotypes: an example from Juniperus. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 31: 375-387.
6. ANDERSON, E. 1949. Introgressive hybridization. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
7. ARBUTHNOTT, J. 1710. An argument for Divine Providence taken from the constant regularity in the births of both sexes. Philosophical Transactions 27: 186-190.
8. BANNISTER, M. H. 1962. Prospects for selection in the cypresses. New Zealand Journal of Forestry 8: 545-559.
9. BARTEL, J. A., R. P. ADAMS, S. A. JAMES, L. E. MUMBA, and R. N. PANDEY. 2003. Variation among Cupressus species from the western hemisphere based on random amplified polymorphic DNAs. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 31: 693-702.
10. CAMUS, A. 1924. Cupressus rustiques dans le Midi. Riviera Scientifique 11: 8-11.
11. CECCHERINI, L., S. RADDI, and C. ANDREOLI. 1998. The effect of seed stratification on germination of 14 Cupressus species. Seed Science and Technology 26: 159-168.
12. CHESNOY, L. 1973. Sur l'origine paternelle des organites du proembryon du Chamaecyparis lawsoniana A. Murr. (Cupressacées). Caryologia 25: 223-232.
13. _. 1977. Étude cytologique des gamètes, de la fécondation et de la proembryogenèse chez le Biota orientalis Endl. III: fécondation et proembryogenèse; transmission du cytoplasme du gamète mâle au proembryon. Revue de Cytologie et de Biologie Végétales 40: 293-396.
14. COOL, L. G. 2001. ent-Daucane and acorane sesquiterpenes from X Cupressocyparis leylandii foliage. Phytochemistry 58: 969-972.
15. EASTWOOD, A. 1900. Notes on Cupressus macnabiana. Zoe 5: 11-13.
16. ENDLER, J. A. 1977. Geographic variation, speciation, and clines. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
17. FISHER, R. A. 1936. The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems. Annals of Eugenics 7: 179-188.
18. FROHLICH, M. W. and E. M. MEYEROWITZ. 1997. The search for flower homeotic gene homologs in basal angiosperms and Gnetales: a potential new source of data on the evolutionary origin of flowers. International Journal of Plant Sciences 158(supplement): S131-S142.
19. GADEK, P. A., D. L. ALPERS, M. M. HESLEWOOD, and C. J. QUINN. 2000. Relationships within Cupressaceae sensu lato: a combined morphological and molecular approach. American Journal of Botany 87: 1044-1057.
20. GRIFFIN, J. R. and C. O. STONE. 1967. MacNab cypress in northern California: a geographic review. Madroño 19: 19-27.
21. _ and W. B. CRITCHFIELD. 1972. The distribution of forest trees in California. USDA Forest Service Research Paper PSW-82. Washington D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
22. HARDHAM, C. B. 1962. The Santa Lucia Cupressus sargentii groves and their associated northern hydrophilous and endemic species. Madroño 16: 173-179.
23. HARRIS, S. and J. B. KIRKPATRICK. 1991. The distributions, dynamics and ecological differentiation of Callitris species in Tasmania. Australian Journal of Botany 39: 187-202.
24. HIRAYOSHI, I. and Y. NAKAMURA. 1943. Chromosome number of Sequoia sempervirens. Botany and Zoology 11: 73-75. [in Japanese]
25. ISODA, K., T. BRODRIBB, and S. SHIRAISHI. 2000. Hybrid origin of Athrotaxis laxifolia (Taxodiaceae) confirmed by random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis. Australian Journal of Botany 48: 753-758.
26. JACKSON, A. B. and W. DALLIMORE. 1926. A new hybrid conifer. Kew Bulletin of Miscellaneous:Information 3: 113-115.
27. JEPSON, W. L. 1910. The silva of California. Memoirs of the University of California vol. 2. Berkeley: The University Press.
28. KONDO, T., Y. TSUMURA, T. KAWAHARA, and M. OKAMURA. 1998. Paternal inheritance of chloroplast and mitochondrial DNA in interspecific hybrids of Chamaecyparis spp. Breeding Science 48: 177-179.
29. KRAMER, C. Y. 1956. Extension of multiple range tests to group means with unequal numbers of replications. Biometrics 12: 307-310.
30. KUSUMI, J., Y. TSUMURA, H. YOSHIMARU, and H. TACHIDA. 2000. Phylogenetic relationships in Taxodiaceae and Cupressaceae sensu stricto based on matK gene, chlL gene, trnL-trnF IGS region, and trnL intron sequences. American Journal of Botany 87: 1480-1488.
31. LAWRENCE, L., R. BARTSCHOT, E. ZAVARIN, and J. R. GRIFFIN. 1975. Natural hybridization of Cupressus sargentii and C. macnabiana and the composition of the derived essential oils. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 2: 113-119.
32. LI, L. 1987. The origin of Sequoia sempervirens (Taxodiaceae) based on karyotype. Acta Botanica Yunnanica 9: 187-192.
33. _. 1988. The parents of Sequoia sempervirens (Taxodiaceae) based on morphology. Acta Botanica Yunnanica 10: 33-37.
34. MARTÍNEZ, M. 1947. Los Cupressus de Mexico. Anales del Instituto de Biologia 18: 71-149.
35. MCMILLAN, C. 1952. The third locality of Cupressus abramsiana Wolf. Madroño 11: 189-194.
36. MITCHELL, A. F. 1970. A note on two new hybrid cypresses. Journal of the Royal Horticultural Society 94: 453-454.
37. NEALE, D. B., K. A. MARSHALL, and D. E. HARRY. 1991. Inheritance of chloroplast and mitochondrial DNA in incense-cedar (Calocedrus decurrens). Canadian Journal of Forest Research 21: 717-720.
38. OLADELE, F. A. 1983. Patterns of cuticular sculpture in the hybrid, Cupressocyparis leylandii (Jackson and Dallimore) Dallimore, and its putative parents. New Phytologist 94: 293-295.
39. PÄÄBO, S. 1990. Amplifying ancient DNA. Pp. 159-166 in PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications, eds. M. A. Innis, D. H. Gelfand, J. J. Sninsky, and T. J. White. San Diego: Academic Press.
40. SHIRAISHI, S., H. MAEDA, T. TODA, K. SEIDO, and Y. SASAKI. 2001. Incomplete paternal inheritance of chloroplast DNA recognized in Chamaecyparis obtusa using an intraspecific polymorphism of the trnD-trnY intergenic spacer region. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 102: 935-941.
41. STEBBINS, G. L. 1948. The chromosomes and relationships of Metasequoia and Sequoia. Science 108: 95-98.
42. TERRY, R. G., R. S. NOWAK, and R. J. TAUSCH. 2000. Genetic variation in chloroplast and nuclear ribosomal DNA in Utah juniper (Juniperus osteosperma, Cupressaceae): evidence for interspecific gene flow. American Journal of Botany 87: 250-258.
43. THOMAS, G. E. and J. F. GOOGANS. 1972. A karyotypic study of cypresses indigenous to the southwestern United States. Agriculture Experiment Station, Auburn University, Auburn, Circular 201.
44. WELLS, H. 1980. A distance coefficient as a hybrization index: an example using Mimulus longiflorus and M. flemingii (Scrophulariaceae) from Santa Cruz Island, California. Taxon 29: 53-65.
45. WILSON, P. 1992. On inferring hybridity from morphological intermediacy. Taxon 41: 11-23.
46. WOLF, C. B. 1948. Taxonomic and distributional studies of the New World cypresses. El Aliso 1: 1-250.
47. ZAR, J. H. 1984. Biostatistical analysis. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.