Predicting habitat quality for Great Tits (Parus major) with airborne laser scanning data

International Journal of Remote Sensing

Volumn 25, Issue 22, 2004, Pages 4851-4855

  Hill, R A ^a   Hinsley, S A ^a   Gaveau, D L A ^a   Bellamy, P E ^a  

^a CENTRE FOR ECOLOGY AND HYDROLOGY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIRD; HABITAT QUALITY; REMOTE SENSING;

PARUS MAJOR;

EID: 8844240029     PISSN: 01431161     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0143116031000139962     Document Type: Review

References (19)

1. Balmer, D., and Milne, L., 2002, CES comes of age. BTO News, 239, 14-15.
2. Baltsavias, E. P., 1999, Airborne laser scanning: existing systems and firms and other resources. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry, 54, 164-198.
3. Beier, P., and Drennan, J. E., 1997, Forest structure and prey abundance in foraging areas on northern goshawks. Ecological Applications, 7, 564-571.
4. Coppedge, B. R., Engle, D. M., Masters, R. E., and Gregory, M. S., 2001, Avian responses to landscape change in fragmented southern Great Plains grasslands. Ecological Applications, 11, 47-59.
5. Fuller, R. J., and Henderson, A. C. B., 1992, Distribution of breeding songbirds in Bradfield Woods, Suffolk, in relation to vegetation and coppice management. Bird Study, 39, 73-88.
6. Hill, R. A., Gaveau, D. L. A., and Spendlove, M., 2002a, Accuracy issues in the assessment of deciduous woodland canopy height by airborne laser scanning: a case study. Operational Tools in Forestry using Remote Sensing Technologies. ForestSAT Symposium, 5-9 August 2002, Heriot Watt University, Edinburgh (Edinburgh: Heriot Watt University).
7. Hill, R. A., Smith, G. M., Fuller, R. M., and Veitch, N., 2002b, Landscape modelling using integrated airborne multi-spectral and elevation data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 23, 2327-2334.
8. Hinsley, S. A., Rothery, P., and Bellamy, P. E., 1999, Influence of woodland area on breeding success in Great Tits (Parus major) and Blue Tits (Parus caeruleus). Journal of Avian Biology, 30, 271-281.
9. Hinsley, S. A., Hill, R. A., Gaveau, D. L. A., and Bellamy, P. E., 2002, Quantifying woodland structure and habitat quality for birds using airborne laser scanning. Functional Ecology, 16, 851-857.
10. Lack, D., 1971, Ecological Isolation in Birds (Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications).
11. Lefsky, M. A., Cohen, W. B., Parker, G. G., and Harding, D. J., 2002, Lidar remote sensing for ecosystem studies. Bioscience, 52, 19-30.
12. Matthysen, E., 1990, Behavioural and ecological correlates of territory quality in the Eurasian Nuthatch (Sitta europaea). Auk, 107, 86-95.
13. Minot, E. O., 1981, Effects of interspecific competition for food in breeding blue and great tits. Journal of Animal Ecology, 50, 375-385.
14. Naef-Daenzer, B., Widmer, F., and Nuber, M., 2001, Differential post-fledging survival of great and coal tits in relation to their condition and fledging date. Journal of Animal Ecology, 70, 730-738.
15. Næsset, E., 2002, Predicting forest stand characteristics with airborne scanning laser using a practical two-stage procedure and field data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 80, 88-99.
16. Perrins, C. M., 1979, British Tits (London: Collins).
17. Przybylo, R., Wiggins, D. A., and Merila, J., 2001, Breeding success in Blue Tits: good territories or good parents? Journal of Avian Biology, 32, 214-218.
18. Riddington, R., and Gosler, A. G., 1995, Differences in reproductive success and parental qualities between habitats in the Great Tit Parus major. Ibis, 137, 371-378.
19. Seki, S.-I., and Takano, H., 1998, Caterpillar abundance in the territory affects the breeding performance of great tit Parus major minor. Oecologia, 114, 514-521.