Stereoscopic retinal scanning laser display with integrated focus cues for ocular accommodation

Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering

Volumn 5291, Issue , 2004, Pages 366-376

  Schowengerdt, Brian T ^a,b   Seibel, Eric J ^a   Silverman, Nick L ^a   Furness III, Thomas A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Accommodation; Display; Retinal scanning display; Scanning laser display; Vergence; VRD

Indexed keywords

ACCOMODATION; DISPLAY; RETINAL SCANNING DISPLAY; SCANNING LASER DISPLAY; VERGENCE; VRD;

CRYSTALLINE MATERIALS; FEEDBACK; IMAGE QUALITY; LASER BEAMS; LASERS; SOFTWARE PROTOTYPING; SPECTROSCOPIC ANALYSIS;

SCANNING;

EID: 8844231638     PISSN: 0277786X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1117/12.529643     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Bobier, W. R., Guinta, A., Kurtz, S., & Howland, H. C. (2000). Prism induced accommodation in infants 3 to 6 months of age. Vision Research, 40(5), 529-37.
2. Charman, W. N., & Tucker, J. (1978). Accommodation and color. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 68(4), 459-471.
3. Fincham, E. F. (1951). The accommodation reflex and its stimulus. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 35, 381-393.
4. Furness, T. A., & Kollin, J. (1995). Virtual retinal display. U.S. Patent #5467104.
5. Gray, L. S., Winn, B. and Gilmartin, B. (1993a). Accommodative microfluctuations and pupil diameter. Vision Res 33, 2083-2090.
6. Helmholtz, H. L. F. v., & König, A. P. (1909). Handbuch der physiologischen Optik (3. aufl. ed.). Hamburg; Leipzig: L. Voss.
7. Hennessy, R. T., Iida, T., Shina, K., and Leibowitz, H. W. (1976). The effect of pupil size on accommodation. Vision Res 16, 587-589.
8. Inoue, T., & Ohzu, H. (1997). Accommodative responses to stereoscopic three-dimensional display. Applied Optics, 36(19), 4509-15.
9. Johnston, R., & Willey, S. (1995). Development of a commercial Virtual Retinal Display. Proceedings of SPIE, Helmet- and Head-Mounted Displays and Symbology Design Requirements, 2464, 2-13.
10. McQuaide, S.C., Seibel, E.J., Burstein, R., & Furness, T.A. III (2002). Three-dimensional Virtual Retinal Display using a deformable membrane mirror. 2002 SID International Symposium Digest of Technical Papers, 33, 1324-1327.
11. Mon-Williams, M., Wann, J. P., & Rushton, S. (1993). Binocular vision in a virtual world: Visual deficits following the wearing of a head-mounted display. Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics, 13(4), 387-391.
12. Ripps, H., Chin, N.B., Siegel, I.M. and Breinen, G.M. (1962).The effect of pupil size on accommodation, convergence, and the AC/A ratio. Investigative Ophthalmology, 1, 127-135.
13. Rushton, S. K., & Riddell, P. M. (1999). Developing visual systems and exposure to virtual reality and stereo displays: some concerns and speculations about the demands on accommodation and vergence. Applied Ergonomics, 30, 69-78.
14. Takeda, T., Hashimoto, K., Hiruma, N., & Fukui, Y. (1999). Characteristics of accommodation toward apparent depth. Vision Research, 39(12), 2087-97.
15. Ward, P. A., and Charman, W. N. (1985). Effect of pupil size on steady state accommodation. Vision Research 25, 1317-1326.
16. Ward, P.A. & Charman, W.N. (1987). On the use of small artificial pupils to open-loop the accommodation system. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 7, 191-193.