Semantic services in e-Learning: An argumentation case study

Educational Technology and Society

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 112-128

  Moreale, Emanuela ^a   Vargas Vera, Maria ^a  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Argumentation in Student Essays; Semantic Services for e Learning; Semantic Web; Services Composition

Indexed keywords

EID: 8844226744     PISSN: 14364522     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (44)

1. Bechhofer, S., & Goble, C. (2001). Towards Annotation Using DAML+OIL. Paper presented at the First International Conference on Knowledge Capture (K-CAP 2001) - Workshop on Semantic Markup and Annotation, 21-23 October, Victoria, B.C., Canada.
2. Bell, P. (1997). Using Argument Representations to Make Thinking Visible for Individuals and Groups. In R. Hall, N. Miyake, & N. Enyedy (Eds.) Proceedings of CSCL '97: The Second International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 10-19.
3. Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., & Lassila, O. (2001). The Semantic Web. Scientific American, May 2001, retrieved October 10, 2004 from http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=00048144-10D2-1C70-84A9809EC588EF21.
4. Brickley, D., & Guha, R. (2000). Resource Description Framework (RDF) Schema Specification 1.0, Candidate recommendation, World Wide Web Consortium, retrieved October 10, 2004 from http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/CR-rdf-schema- 20000327.
5. Buckingham Shum, S., Uren, V., Li, G., Domingue, J., & Motta, E. (2002). Visualizing Internetworked Argumentation. In Paul A. Kirschner, Simon J. Buckingham Shum and Chad S. Carr (Eds.) Visualizing Argumentation: Software Tools for Collaborative and Educational Sense-Making, London: Springer-Verlag, 185-204.
6. Burstein, J., & Marcu, D. (2000). Toward Using Text Summarization for Essay-Based Feedback. Paper presented at the Traitement Automatique du Langage Naturel 2000 Conference, 16-18 October 2000, Lausanne, Switzerland.
7. Burstein, J., Kukich, K., Wolff, S., Lu, C., & Chodorow, M. (1998). Enriching automated essay scoring using discourse marking. Paper presented at the Workshop on Discourse Relations and Discourse Markers, Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics, 10-14 August, Montreal, Canada.
8. Ciravegna, F., Dingli, A., Petrelli, D., & Wilks, Y. (2002). User-System Cooperation in Document Annotation based on Information Extraction. Paper presented at the 13th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management (EKAW02), 1-4 October, Sigüenza, Spain.
9. Ciravegna, F. (2001a). Adaptive Information Extraction from Text by Rule Induction and Generalisation. Paper presented at the 17th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2001), 4-10 August, Seattle, USA.
10. Ciravegna, F. (2001b). LP2 an Adaptive Algorithm for Information Extraction from Web-related Texts. Paper presented at the Workshop on Adaptive Text Extraction and Mining held in conjunction with the 17th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-01), 4-10 August, Seattle, USA.
11. Clocksin, W. F., & Mellish, C. S. (1981). Programming in Prolog, Springer-Verlag.
12. Doan, A. H., Madhavan, J., Domingos, P., & Halevy, A. (2002). Learning to Map between Ontologies on the Semantic Web. Paper presented at the Eleventh International World Wide Web Conference 2002, 7-11 May, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA.
13. Domingue, J. (1998). Tadzebao and WebOnto Discussing, Browsing, and Editing Ontologies on the Web. Paper presented at the 11th Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-Based Systems Workshop, 18-23 April, Banff, Alberta, Canada.
14. Fensel, D., & Motta, E. (2001). Structured Development of Problem Solving Methods. Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 13 (6), 9131-9132.
15. Gruber, T. R. (1993). A Translation Approach to Portable Ontology Specification. Knowledge Acquisition, 5 (2): 199-220.
16. Handschuh, S., Staab, S., & Maedche, A. (2001). CREAM - Creating relational metadata with a component-based, ontology-driven annotation framework. Paper presented at the First International Conference on Knowledge Capture (K-CAP 2001), 21-23 October, Victoria, B.C., Canada.
17. Hayes, P. (2002). RDF Model Theory, W3C Working Draft, retrieved October 23, 2004 from http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-mt/.
18. Hendler, J., Berners-Lee, T., & Miller, E. (2002). Integrating Applications on the Semantic Web. Journal of the Institute of Electrical Engineers of Japan, 122 (10), 676-680.
19. Hyland, K. (1998). Persuasion and Context: The Pragmatics of Academic Metadiscourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 30, 437-455.
20. Kahan J., Koivunen, M., Prud'Hommeaux, E., & Swick, R. (2001). Annotea: Open RDF Infrastructure for Shared Web Annotations. Paper presented at the WWW10 International Conference. 1-5 May, Hong Kong.
21. Kogut, P., & Holmes, W. (2001). AeroDAML - Applying Information Extraction to Generate DAML Annotations from Web Pages. Paper presented at the First International Conference on Knowledge Capture (K-CAP 2001) - Workshop on Semantic Markup and Annotation, 21-23 October, Victoria, B.C., Canada.
22. th. International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-97), 23-29 August, Nagoya, Japan.
23. Lassila, O., & Swick, R. R. (1999). Resource Description Framework (RDF): Model and Syntax Specification. Recommendation. World Wide Web Consortium, retrieved October 23, 2004 from http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-rdf-syntax/ .
24. Mann, W. C., & Thompson, S. A. (1998). Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization. Text, 8 (3), 243-281.
25. Maynard, D., Tablan, V., Cunningham, H., Ursu, C., Saggion, C., Bontcheva, K., & Wilks, Y. (2002). Architectural Elements of Language Engineering Robustness. Journal of Natural Language Engineering, 8 (2-3), 257-274.
26. McIlraith, S., Son, T. C., & Zeng, H. (2001) Semantic Web Services, IEEE Intelligent Systems, 16 (2), 46-53.
27. Moreale, E., & Vargas-Vera, M. (2004). A Question-Answering System Using Argumentation. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2972, 400-409.
28. Moreale, E., & Vargas-Vera, M. (2003). Genre Analysis and the Automated Extraction of Arguments from Student Essays. Paper presented at the 7th International Computer Assisted Assessment Conference (CAA-2003), 8-9 July, Loughborough, United Kingdom.
29. Motta, E. (1999).Reusable Components for Knowledge Models, Amsterdam: IOS Press.
30. Noy, N., & Musen, M. (2000). PROMPT: Algorithm and Tool for Automated Ontology Merging and Alignment. Paper presented atthe 17th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), 30 July - 3 August, Austin, Texas, USA.
31. Quan, D., & Karger, D. R. (2004) How to Make a Semantic Web Browser. Paper presented at the 13th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW 2004), 17-22 May, New York, USA, retrieved October 23, 2004 from http://www.ai.mit.edu/ people/dquan/www2004-browser.pdf.
32. Sharples, M., & O'Malley, C. (1988). A Framework for the Design of a Writer's Assistant. In J. Self (Ed.) Artificial Intelligence and Human Learning: Intelligent Computer-Aided Instruction, London: Chapman and Hall, 276-290.
33. Smolensky, P., Fox, B., King, R., & Lewis, C. (1987). Computer-aided Reasoned Discourse or How to Argue with a Computer. In R. Guindon (Ed.) Cognitive Science and its Applications for Human-Computer Interaction, Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex, 109-162.
34. Stojanovic, N., Maedche, A., Staab, S., Studer, R., & Sure, Y. (2001a). SEAL - A Framework for Developing Semantic Portals. Paper presented at the First International Conference on Knowledge Capture (K-CAP 2001), 21-23 October, Victoria, B.C., Canada.
35. Stojanovic, N., Staab, S., & Studer, R. (2001b). eLearning Based on the Semantic Web. Paper presented at the the World Conference on the WWW and Internet (WebNet2001), 23-27 October, Orlando, Florida, USA.
36. Studer, R., Sure, Y., & Volz, R. (2002). Managing User Focused Access to Distributed Knowledge. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 8 (6), 662-672.
37. Suthers, D., Weiner, A., Connelly, J., & Paolucci, M. (1995). Belvedere: Engaging Students in Critical Discussions of Science and Public Policy Issues. Paper presented at the 7th World Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 95), 16-19 August, Washington, DC, USA.
38. Swales, J. M. (1990).Genre Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39. Teufel, S., Carletta, J., & Moens, M. (1999). An Annotation Scheme for Discourse-Level Argumentation in Research Articles. Paper presented at the Ninth Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL'99), 8-12 June, Bergen, Norway.
40. Vargas-Vera, M., & Motta, E. (2004). AQUA - Ontology-based Question Answering System. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2972, 468-477.
41. Vargas-Vera, M., Motta, E., & Domingue, J. (2003). AQUA: An Ontology-Driven Question Answering System. AAAI Spring Symposium, 24-26 March, Stanford, USA.
42. Vargas-Vera, M., Motta, E., Domingue, J., Lanzoni, M., Stutt, A., & Ciravegna, F. (2002). MnM: Ontology Driven Semi-Automatic and Automatic Support for Semantic Markup. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2473, 379-391.
43. Vargas-Vera, M. (1995). Using Prolog Techniques to Guide Program Composition. PhD. Thesis, Dept. of Artificial Intelligence, Edinburgh University, United Kingdom.
44. Vargas-Vera, M., & Robertson, D. (1994). An Environment for Combining Prolog Programs Based on Knowledge about their Construction. Paper presented at the 10th Workshop on Logic Programming (WLP 94), 5-7 October, Zurich, Switzerland.