Vasoreactivity of the radial artery after transradial catheterization

Journal of Invasive Cardiology

Volumn 16, Issue 11, 2004, Pages 635-638

  Sanmartin, Marcelo ^a,b   Goicolea, Javier ^a   Ocaranza, Raymundo ^a   Cuevas, Diogenes ^a   Calvo, Francisco ^a  

^a Unidad Hemodinamica   (Spain)

^b Unidad Hemodinamica   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GLYCERYL TRINITRATE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTERY CATHETERIZATION; ARTERY DIAMETER; ARTERY INJURY; ARTICLE; BLOOD VESSEL REACTIVITY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HUMAN; HYPEREMIA; MALE; RADIAL ARTERY; ULTRASOUND; VASODILATATION; VASOMOTOR REFLEX;

AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANGIOPLASTY, TRANSLUMINAL, PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY; CORONARY DISEASE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROBABILITY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RADIAL ARTERY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAMPLING STUDIES; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, DOPPLER; VASCULAR PATENCY; VASOCONSTRICTION; VASODILATION;

EID: 8844223304     PISSN: 10423931     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ, Odekerken D, et al. A randomized comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by the radial, brachial and femoral approaches: the Access study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;9:518-22.
2. Wakeyama T, Ogawa H, Iida H, Takaki A, et al. Intima-Media thickening of the radial artery after transradial intervention. An intravascular ultrasound study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;41:1109-1114.
3. Schwartz RS, Huber KC, Murphy JG, et al. Restenosis and the proportional neointimal response to coronary artery injury: results in a porcine model. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992;19:267-274.
4. Bauters C, Isner J. The Biology of Restenosis. In: Topol EJ, editor. Texbook of Cardiovascular Medicine. Lippincot-Raven 1998. pp. 2465-2489.
5. Correti MC, Anderson TJ, Benjamin EJ, et al. Guidelines for the ultrasound assessment of endothelial-dependent flow-mediated vasodilation of the brachial artery. A report of the International Brachial Artery Reactivity Task Force. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39:257-265.
6. Sorensen KE, Celermajer DS, Spiegelhalter DJ, et al. Non-invasive measurement of human endothelium dependent arterial responses: Accuracy and reproducibility. Br Heart J 1995;74:247-253.
7. Anderson TJ, Uehata A, Gerhard MD, et al. Close relation of endothelial function in the human coronary and peripheral circulations. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;26:1235-1241.
8. Spaulding C, Lefevre T, Funck F, et al. Left radial approach for coronary angiography: results of a prospective study. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1996;39:365-370.
9. Louvard Y, Lefevre T, Allain A, Morice MC. Coronary angiography through the radial or the femoral approach: the CARAFE study. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2001;52:181-187.
10. Saito S, Ikei H, Hosokawa G, Tanaka S. Influence of the ratio between radial artery inner diameter and sheath outer diameter on radial artery flow after transradial coronary intervention. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 1999;46:173-178.
11. Nagai S, Abe S, Sato T, et al. Ultrasonic assessment of vascular complications in coronary angiography and angioplasty after transradial approach. Am J Cardiol 1999;83:180-186.
12. Yoo BS, Lee SH, Ko JY, et al. Procedural outcomes of repeated transradial coronary procedure. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2003;58:301-304.