Constructing knowledge networks in middle school classrooms

ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2001, Pages 2997-3005

  Larkin Hein, Teresa ^a   Irvine, Sarah E ^a   Prejean, Andrea I ^a   Lesiak, Mary Anne ^a  

^a AMERICAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASSROOMS; CONSTRUCTIVIST THEORY; CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT; FACULTIES;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; CURRICULA; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; TEACHING; TECHNICAL PRESENTATIONS;

ENGINEERING EDUCATION;

EID: 8744300688     PISSN: 01901052     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Dede, C. (1999). The multiple-media difference. Technos, 8, 16 -18.
2. Bruner, J. (1963). The process of education. Cambridge. Harvard University Press.
3. Papert, S. & Turkle, S. (1993). Styles and voices. For the Learning of Learning of Mathematics, 13, 49 - 52.
4. Dede, C. & Sprauge, D. (1999). Constructivism in the classroom: If I teach this way am I doing my job? Learning and Leading with Technology, 27. 6-9.
5. Egbert J., Thomas M, & Fischler R. (2000). Assessing the Tigerlake public schools simulation: Using technology to link teacher education theory and practice. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 54, 23 27.
6. Brooks, J. G. & Brooks, M. G. (1993). In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Alexandria, VA.
7. Jonassen, D. H. & Rohrer-Murphy, L. (1999). Activity theory as a framework for designing constructivist learning environments. Educational Training and Development, 42(1), 61 - 79.
8. Cobb, T. (1999). Applying constructivism: A test for the-learner-as- scientist. Educational Training and Development, 47(3), 15-31.
9. Balestri, P. D, Ehrman, C.S., & Ferguson, L. D. (1992). Learning to design designing to learn: Using technology to transform the curriculum. London: Taylor & Francis.
10. Bopry, J. (1999). The warrant for constructivist practice within educational technology. Education Training and Development, 47(4), 5 - 26.
11. Ref. 3
12. Gulp, C., Riffee, W., Starrett, D., Sarin, S., & Abrahamsen, H. (2001). Faculty rewards in digital instructional environments. Syllabus, 14(6), 10-14.
13. Tapscott, D. (1999). Educating the net generation. Educational Leadership, 56(5), 6-11.
14. Parker, D. R. (1997). Increasing faculty use of technology in teaching and teacher education. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 5(2/3), 105 -115.
15. Betz, M. K. & Mitchell, J. W. (1996). Ed Tech in teacher education: Curricular space required. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 4(3/4), 181 -196.
16. Wallinger, L. M. (1997). Developing technology training for teachers. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 34(1), 18-19.
17. Bybee, R. W. (1998). Improving precollege science education - The involvment of scientists and engineers. Journal of College Science Teaching, 27(5), 324 - 328.
18. Shulman, L. S. (1999). Taking learning seriously. Change, 31(4), 10 -17.
19. Brown, J. S. (2000). Growing up digital. Change, 32(2), 10 - 20.
20. Perkins, D. (1999). The many faces of constructivism. Educational Leadership, 51(3), 6-11.
21. Hein, T. L. (2000). Learning styles in introductory physics: Enhancing student motivation, interest, and learning. Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering and Computer Education (ICECE), Sáo Paulo, Brazil.
22. Rasmussen, K. L. & Davidson-Shivers, G. V. (1998). Hypermedia and learning styles: Can performance be influenced? Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 2(4), 291 - 308.
23. c3,7- 11.
24. Irvine, S. E. & Hein, T. L. (1998). Technology and the diverse learner. AAPT Announcer, 28(2), 86.
25. Jensen, E. (1998). Teaching with the brain in mind. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Alexandria, VA.