Affecting the perception of verbal cues to deception

Applied Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 35-49

  Strömwall, Leif A ^a   Granhag, Pär Anders ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LOGIC; MALE; MEDICOLEGAL ASPECT; PERCEPTION; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RATING SCALE; VERBAL BEHAVIOR; VERBAL COMMUNICATION; VIDEORECORDING;

EID: 8744295842     PISSN: 08884080     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/acp.851     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bell BE, Loftus EF. 1989. Trivial persuasion in the courtroom: the power of (a few) minor details. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 56: 669-679.
2. Berman GL, Cutler BL. 1996. Effects of inconsistencies in eyewitness testimony on mock-juror decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology 81: 170-177.
3. Buller DB, Strzyzewski KD, Hunsaker FG. 1991. Interpersonal deception: II. The inferiority of conversational participants as deception detectors. Communication Monographs 58: 25-40.
4. Burgoon JK, Newton DA. 1991. Applying a social meaning model to relational messages of conversational involvement: Comparing participant and observer perspectives. Southern Communication Journal 56: 96-113.
5. Gilbert DT. 1998. Ordinary personology. In The Handbook of Social Psychology, Gilbert DT, Fiske ST, Lindzey G (eds). McGraw-Hill: Boston; 89-150.
6. Gilbert DT, Krull DS. 1988. Seeing less and knowing more: the benefits of perceptural ignorance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54: 193-202.
7. Granhag PA, Strömwall LA. 1999. Repeated interrogations - Stretching the deception detection paradigm. Expert Evidence 9 163-174.
8. Granhag PA, Strömwall LA. 2000. The effects of preconceptions on deception detection and new answers to why lie-catchers often fail. Psychology, Crime, & Law 6: 197-218.
9. Granhag PA, Strömwall LA. 2001. Deception detection based on repeated interrogations. Legal and Criminological Psychology 6: 85-101.
10. Granhag PA, Strömwall LA. in press. Deception detection: interrogators' and observers' decoding of consecutive statements. The Journal of Psychology.
11. Greuel L. 1992. Police officers' beliefs about cues associated with deception in rape cases. In Psychology and Law - International Perspectives, Lösel F, Bender D, Bliesener T (eds . Walter de Gruyter: Berlin; 234-239.
12. Johnson MK, Raye CL. 1981. Reality monitoring. Psychological Review 88: 67-85.
13. Kalbfleisch PJ. 1990. Listening for deception: The effects of medium on accuracy of detection. In Listening Behavior. Measurement and Application, Bostrom RN (ed.). Guilford Press: New York; 155-176.
14. Kraut RE. 1978. Verbal and nonverbal cues in the perception of lying. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 36: 380-391.
15. Leippe MR, Manion AP, Romanczyk A. 1992. Eyewitness persuasion: how and how well do fact finders judge the accuracy of adults' and childrens' memory reports. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 63: 181-197.
16. Mann S, Vrij A, Bull R. 2000. Telling and detecting true lies. In Forensic Psychology and Law, Czerederecka, A, Jaskiewicz-Obydzinska T, Wojcikiewicz J (eds). Institute of Forensic Research Publishers: Cracow; 221-225.
17. Millar MG, Millar KU. 1997. The effects of cognitive capacity and suspicion on truth bias. Communication Research 24: 556-570.
18. Penney CG. 1989. Modality effects and the structure of short-term verbal memory. Memory & Cognition 17: 398-422.
19. Porter S, Yuille JC, Lehman DR. 1999. The nature of real, implanted, and fabricated memories of emotional childhood events: Implications for the recovered memory debate. Law and Human Behavior 23: 517-537.
20. Rommetveit R. 1974. On Message Structure. John Wiley: London.
21. Sporer SL. 1997. The less travelled road to truth: verbal cues in deception detection in accounts of fabricated and self-experienced events. Applied Cognitive Psychology 11: 373-397.
22. Steller M, Köhnken G. 1989. Criteria-Based Content Analysis. In Psychological Methods in Criminal Investigation and Evidence, Raskin DC (ed.). Springer-Verlag: New York; 217-245.
23. Strömwall LA, Granhag PA. in press. How to detect deception? Arresting the beliefs of police officers, prosecutors and judges. Psychology, Crime, & Law.
24. Strömwall LA, Granhag PA, Jonsson A-C. in press. Deception among pairs: 'Let's say we had lunch and hope that they swallow it!' Psychology, Crime, and Law.
25. Tindall-Ford S, Chandler P, Sweller J. 1997. When two sensory modes are better than one. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 3: 257-287.
26. Toris C, DePaulo BM. 1985. Effects of actual deception and suspiciousness of deception on interpersonal perceptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 47: 1063-1073.
27. Vrij A. 2000. Detecting Lies and Deceit: The Psychology of Lying and Its Implications of Professional Practice. John Wiley: Chichester.
28. Vrij A, Mann S. 2001. Lying when the stakes are high: deceptive behaviour of a murderer during his police interview. Applied Cognitive Psychology 15: 187-203.
29. Zuckerman M, DePaulo BM, Rosenthal R. 1981. Verbal and nonverbal communication of deception. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 14, Berkowitz L (ed.). Academic Press: New York; 1-59.