Comparison between cohesive zone models

Communications in Numerical Methods in Engineering

Volumn 20, Issue 11, 2004, Pages 845-856

  Volokh, K Y ^a  

^a TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; CRACK PROPAGATION; CRACKS; FAILURE ANALYSIS; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NUCLEATION; STRESS ANALYSIS;

COHESIVE ZONE MODELS (CZM); DISPLACEMENT JUMPS; MATERIAL FAILURES;

FRACTURE MECHANICS;

MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 8744291142     PISSN: 10698299     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cnm.717     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Barenblatt GI. The formation of equilibrium cracks during brittle fracture. General ideas and hypotheses: axially-symmetric cracks. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics (PMM) 1959; 23 434-444.
2. Dugdale DS. Yielding of steel sheets containing slits. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 1960; 8:100-104.
3. Needleman A. A continuum model for void nucleation by inclusion debonding. Journal of Applied Mechanics 1987; 54 525-531.
4. Rice JR, Wang J-S. Embrittlement of interfaces by solute segregation. Material Science and Engineering A 1989; 107 23-40.
5. Tvergaard V, Hutchinson JW. The relation between crack growth resistance and fracture process parameters in elastic-plastic solids. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 1992; 40 1377-1397.
6. Xu XP, Needleman A. Numerical simulation of fast crack growth in brittle solids. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 1994; 42:1397-1434.
7. Camacho GT, Ortiz M. Computational modeling of impact damage in brittle materials. International Journal of Solids and Structures 1996; 33:2899-2938.
8. Geubelle PH, Baylor J. Impact-induced delamination of laminated composites: a 2D simulation. Composites Part B Engineering 1998; 29:589-602.
9. Alfano G, Crisheld MA. Finite element interface models for the delamination analysis of laminated composites: mechanical and computational issues. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2001; 50:1701-1736.
10. Chandra N, Li H, Shet C, Ghonem H. Some issues in the application of cohesive zone models for metal-ceramic interfaces. International Journal of Solids and Structures 2002; 39 2827-2855.
11. Foulk JW, Allen DH, Helms KLE. Formulation of a three-dimensional cohesive zone model for application to a finite element algorithm. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2000; 183:51-66.
12. Hutchinson JW, Evans AG. Mechanics of materials: top-down approaches to fracture. Acta Materialia 2000; 48:125-135.
13. Mohammed I, Leichti KM. Cohesive zone modeling of crack nucleation at bimaterial corners. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 2000; 48:735-764.
14. Needleman A. Numerical modeling of crack growth under dynamic loading conditions. Computational Mechanics 1997; 19:463-469.
15. Rahulkumar P, Jagota A, Bennison SJ, Saigal S. Cohesive element modeling of viscoelastic fracture: application to peel testing of polymers. International Journal of Solids and Structures 2000; 37:1873-1897.
16. Wells GN, de Borst R, Sluys LJ. A consistent geometrically non-linear approach for delamination. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2002; 54:1333-1355.