Use of bifurcation analysis for identification of a safe CSTR operability

Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries

Volumn 17, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 489-498

  Molnar A ^a   Krajciova M ^a   Markos J ^a   Jelemensky L ^a  

^a SLOVAK UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Slovakia)

Author keywords

Bifurcation diagrams; Complex reaction; Multiple steady states; Qualitative risk assessment; Safety analysis of CSTR; Stability analysis

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; BIFURCATION (MATHEMATICS); COMPUTER SIMULATION; COOLING; HYDROLYSIS; POLYPROPYLENE OXIDES; PROBLEM SOLVING;

EXOTHERMIC REACTIONS; OPERABILITY; STEADY STATES;

PROCESS ENGINEERING;

BIFURCATION; HYDROLYSIS; SAFETY;

EID: 8744289684     PISSN: 09504230     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2004.08.008     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Allgower, E. L., & Georg, K. (1990). Numerical continuation methods. An introduction. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
2. Farr, W. W., & Aris, R. (1986). Yet who would have thought the old man to have had so much blood in him? Reflections on the multiplicity of steady states of the stirred tank reactor. Chemical Engineering Science, 41, 1385-1402.
3. Fogler, H. S. (1999). Elements of chemical reaction engineering. London: Prentice Hall, Inc.
4. Gray, P., & Scott, S. K. (1983). Autocatalytic reactions in the isothermal, continuous stirred tank reactor: isolas and other forms of multistability. Chemical Engineering Science, 55(1), 29-43.
5. Gray, P., & Scott, S. K. (1984). Autocatalytic reactions in the isothermal, continuous stirred tank reactor: oscillations and instabilities in the system A + 2B → 3B; B → C. Chemical Engineering Science, 39(6), 1087-1097.
6. Heerden, C. V. (1953). Autothermic processes. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 45, 1242-1247.
7. Kubíček, M. (1976). Algorithm 502. Dependence of solution of nonlinear systems on a parameter [C5], ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, 2, 98-107.
8. Kubíček, M., & Marek, M. (1983). Computational methods in bifurcation theory and dissipative structures. New York: Springer-Verlag.
9. Molnár, A., Markoš, J., & Jelemenský, L. (2002). Accuracy of mathematical model with regard to safety analysis of chemical reactors. Chemical Papers, 56, 357-361.
10. Molnár, A., Markoš, J., & Jelemenský, L. (2003a). Safety analysis of CSTR towards changes in operating conditions. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 16(5), 373-380.
11. Molnár, A., Markoš, J., & Jelemenský, L. (2003b). Mathematical models for safety analysis of chemical reactors - the role of the model accuracy, Fourth European Congress of ECCE, Granada, Spain.
12. Morud, J. C., & Skogestad, S. (1998). Analysis of Instability in an industrial ammonia reactor. AIChE Journal, 44, 888-895.
13. Šoóš, M., Markoš, J., & Jelemenský, Ľ. (2001). Safety of chemical reactors. Petroleum and Coal, 43, 188-192.
14. Sullivan, C. J. (Ed.) (1993), Propaniediols. Ullmann's encyclopedia of industrial chemistry. VCH Publishers, Inc.
15. Westerterp, K. R., v. Swaaij, W. P. M., & Beenackers, A. A. C. M. (1984). Chemical reactor design and operation. Amsterdam: Netherlands University Press.