Pedagogies of liberation in an engineering thermodynamics class

ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 911-926

  Riley, Donna ^a  

^a SMITH COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASSROON DYNAMICS; COURSE DEVELOPMENT; CURRICULAR REFORM; POLICY CONSIDERATIONS;

CURRICULA; PUBLIC POLICY; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; STUDENTS; TEACHING; THERMODYNAMICS;

ENGINEERING EDUCATION;

EID: 8744287780     PISSN: 01901052     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Davis, C. and Rosser, S.V. (1997). Program and Curricular Interventions. The Equity Equation: Fostering the advancement of women in the sciences mathematics, and engineering. C. Davis, A. Ginorio, C.S. Hollenshead, B.B. Lazarus, P.M. Rayman, et al. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 232-264:
2. Rosser, S.V. (1997). Re-Engineering Female-Friendly Science. New York: Teachers College Press.
3. Subramaniam, B., Ginorio, A.B., and Yee, S.Y. (1999) Feminism, Women's Studies, and Engineering: Opportunities and Challenges. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 5:311-322.
4. Freire, P. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. (1971). New York: Herder & Herder.
5. hooks, b. (1994). Teaching to Transgress: Education as the Practice of Freedom. NewYork: Routledge.
6. Rosser, S.V. and Kelly, B. (1994). From hostile exclusion to friendly inclusion: USC System Model Project for the transformation of science and math teaching to reach women in varied campus settings. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 1(1): 29-44.
7. Felder, R.M. Woods, D.R., Slice, J.E. and Rugarcia, A. (2000). The Future of Engineering Education: II.
8. Teaching Methods that Work. Chemical Engineering Education, 34 (1): 26-39.
9. Tobias, S. (1990). They're not dumb, they're different: Stalking the second tier. Tucson, AZ: Research Corp.
10. National Research Council. (1995). Engineering Education: Designing an Adaptive System. Washington: National Academy Press.
11. Accreditation Board on Engineering and Technology (2002). Criteria 2000. http://www.abet.org/images/Criteria/2002-03EACCriteria.pdf accessed August 25, 2002.
12. Mikic, B. and Grasso, D. (2002). Socially-Relevant Design: The TOY-Tech Project at Smith College. Journal of Engineering Education, July 2002: 319-326.
13. nd edition. Boston: Wadsworth.
14. Al-Hassan, A. Y. and Hill, D. R. (1986). Islamic Technology: an illustrated history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. James, P. and Thorpe, N. (1994). Ancient Inventions. New York: Ballantine Books.
16. Macdonald, A. (1992). Feminine Ingenuity: Women and Invention in America. New York: Ballantine Books.
17. Stanley, A. (1993) Mothers and Daughters of Invention: Notes for a Revised History of Technology. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
18. Taylor, F.S. (1949) The Alchemists: founders of modern chemistry. New York: Schuman.
19. Von Baeyer, H.C. (1999). Warmth Disperses and Time Passes: a history of heat. New York: Modern Library, 1999.
20. Rugarcia, A., Felder, R.M., Woods, D. R., and Stice, J. E. (2000) "The Future of Engineering Education: I. A Vision for a New Century." Chemical Engineering Education, 34 (1): 16-25.
21. th ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.