An economic evaluation of livestock odor regulation distances

Journal of Environmental Quality

Volumn 33, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 1997-2006

  Bazen, Ernest F ^a   Fleming, Ronald A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURE; COSTS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; LAWS AND LEGISLATION;

ODOR ABATEMENT; ODOR IMPACTS;

ODOR CONTROL;

ARTICLE; ECONOMIC EVALUATION; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HOME; HOME OWNER; INDUSTRY; LAW; LAW SUIT; LIVESTOCK; LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION; ODOR CONTROL; ODOR REGULATION DISTANCE; PUBLIC HEALTH; SETBACK REGULATION; UNITED STATES;

EID: 8744282642     PISSN: 00472425     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2004.1997     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Abeles-Allison. M., and L.J. Connor. 1990. An analysis of local benefits and costs of Michigan hog operations experiencing environmental conflicts. Dep. Agric. Econ.. Agric. Econ. Rep. 536. Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI.
2. Babcock. B.A., J.A. Herriges, and S. Secchi. 2003. Living with hogs in rural Iowa. Iowa Agric. Rev. 9(3):1-3. Univ. of Iowa, Ames, IA.
3. Barry, PJ. 1996. Asset valuation: Effects of growth, inflation, and market efficiency. Intermediate agricultural finance: Agric. econ. 304 notes. Dep. Agric. Consumer Econ., Univ. of Illinois. Urbana, IL.
4. Fleming, R.A. 1999. The economic impact of setback requirements on land application of swine manure. Land Econ. 75:110-124.
5. Fleming, R.A., B.A. Babcock, and E. Wang. 1998. Resource or waste? The economics of swine manure storage and management. Rev. Agric. Econ. 20:96-113.
6. Funk, T. 2003. Controlling dust and odor a( livestock operations. Poultry Times. Sept. 2003. p. 24. Poultry and Egg News. Gainesville, FL.
7. Harford, J.D. 1978. Firm behavior under imperfectly enforceable pollution standards and taxes. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 5:26-43.
8. Heber, A.J. 1997. Setbacks for sufficient swine odor dispersion and dilution. Livestock and environmental symposium. Columbus. NE. 10-11 Dec. 1997. Univ. of Nebraska Coop. Ext. Service, Columbus. NE.
9. Hoag. D.L., and F.M. Roka. 1995. Environmental policy and swine manure management: Waste not want not? Am. J. Altern. Agric. 10:163-166.
10. Hurley, T.M., J. Kliebenstein, and P.F. Orazem. 1996. The structure of wages and benefits in the U.S. pork industry. Working paper. Dep. Econ., Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA.
11. Jiang, J.K., and J. Sands. 1998. Report on odour emissions from poultry farms in western Australia. Odour Research Lab., Univ. of New South Wales, Sydney.
12. Keeler, A. 1991. Noncompliant firms in TDP markets. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 21:180-189.
13. Kentucky Division of Water. 1998. Legislative research commission [Online]. Available at http://www.water.ky.gov/permitting/waste waterpermitting/KPDES/cafo/default.htm (verified 29 June 2004). Kentucky natural resource website. Kentucky Division of Water, Frankfort, KY.
14. Krause, K.H., and T. Lung. 1993. Immissionsprognostik vo Geruchsstoffeintagen im Rahmen von Genehmigungsverfahren. Staub. Reinhalt. Luft 53:323-419.
15. Letson, D., and N. Gollehon. 1996. Confined animal production and the manure problem. Choices. Third Quarter:18-24.
16. Palmquist, R.B., P.M. Roka, and T. Vukina. 1997. Hog operations, environmental effects and residential property values. Land Econ. 73:114-124.
17. Purcell, W.D. 2002. Demand for meats: Past, present, and a look ahead. Meat Importer's Council of Am., New Orleans, LA.
18. Randall, A. 1999. A new look at the old problems of externalities. Choices. First Quarter:29-32.
19. Ready. R., and C. Abdalla. 2003. GIS analysis of land use on the rural-urban fringe: The impact of land use and potential local disamenities on residential property values and on the location of residential development in Berks County, Pennsylvania. Staff paper 364. Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA.
20. Roka, F.M., and D.L. Hoag. 1996. Manure value and live weight swine decisions. J. Agric. Appl. Econ. 28:193-202.
21. Rosen, S. 1974. Hedonic prices and implicit markets: Product differentiation in pure competition. J. Political Econ. 82:34-55.
22. Schauberger, G., M. Piringer, and E. Petz. 2001. Separation distance to avoid odor nuisance due to livestock calculated by the Austrian odour dispersion model (AODM). Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 87: 13-28.
23. Schauberger, G., M. Piringer, and E. Petz. 2002. Calculating direction-dependent separation distance by a dispersion model to avoid live-stock odour annoyance. Biosyst. Eng. 82(1):25-37.
24. U.S. Census Bureau. 2003. Census of population and housing. Summary file 3; generated by Ernest Bazen using 2000 Census American FactFinder [Online]. Available at http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/BasicFactsServlet (accessed 15 Sept. 2003; verified 29 June 2004). U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC.
25. Viscusi, W.K., and R. Zeckhauser. 1979. Optimal standards with incomplete enforcement. Public Policy 27(4):437-456.
26. Watts, P.J., and J.M. Sweeten. 1995. Toward a better regulatory model for odour. Proc. Conf. Feedlot Waste Management, Queensland, Australia. 12-14 June 1995. Queensland Dep. of Primary Industries and Univ. of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba.