The significance and limitations of the vanth observation system within engineering classrooms

ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 8789-8792

  Cox, Monica Farmer ^a   Harris, Alene H ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASSROOMS; LEARNING THEORIES; VANTH OBSERVATION SYSTEM (VOS);

BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; CURRICULA; PERSONNEL; PROFESSIONAL ASPECTS; STUDENTS; TEACHING;

ENGINEERING EDUCATION;

EID: 8744270257     PISSN: 01901052     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (6)

1. Banville, D., & Rikard, L. (2001). Observational tools for teacher reflection. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 72, 4, 46-49.
2. Bowman, B.T. (1989). Self-reflection as an element of professionalism. Teachers College Record, 90,3, 444.
3. Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professioriate. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
4. Bransford, J., Brown, A.L., & Cocking, R.R. (Eds.) (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
5. Lee, J.A., Castella, D.M., & Middleton, S.G. (1997). Faculty perceptions of academe's evaluation system. Journal of Engineering Education, 86, 3, 263-267.
6. McGourty, J., M. Besterfield-Sacre, L.J. Shuman, "ABET's Eleven Student Learning Outcomes (a-k): Have We Considered the Implications?" 1999 American Society for Engineering Education Conference Proceedings, June 1999, Charlotte, NC.