Outcome after implantation of a novel prosthetic anal sphincter in humans

British Journal of Surgery

Volumn 91, Issue 11, 2004, Pages 1485-1492

  Finlay, I G ^a   Richardson, W ^b   Hajivassiliou, C A ^a  

^a GLASGOW ROYAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

^b NHS GREATER GLASGOW AND CLYDE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANUS SPHINCTER; ANUS SPHINCTER PROSTHESIS; ANUS SURGERY; BIOMECHANICS; DEVICE; FECES INCONTINENCE; FEMALE; FIBER OPTICS; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; IN VITRO STUDY; INTESTINE ISCHEMIA; INTESTINE MUCOSA; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS INFECTION; REVIEW; SCORING SYSTEM; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; ANAL CANAL; ARTIFICIAL ORGANS; FECAL INCONTINENCE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 8744242910     PISSN: 00071323     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.4721     Document Type: Review

References (29)

1. Swash M. Faecal incontinence: childbirth is responsible for most cases. BMJ 1993; 307: 636-637.
2. Pinedo G, Vaizey CJ, Nicholls RJ, Roach R, Halligan S, Kamm MA. Results of repeat anal sphincter repair. Br J Surg 1999; 86: 66-69.
3. Wong WD, Congliosi SM, Spencer MP, Corman ML, Tan P, Opelka FG et al. The safety and efficacy of the artificial bowel sphincter for fecal incontinence: results from a multicenter cohort study. Dis Colon Rectum 2002; 45: 1139-1153.
4. Carter KB, Finlay IG, Richardson W. Prosthetic Anal Sphincter. International Patent 1992; WO 92/16162: 1-24.
5. Cheremisinoff NP. Governing equations for single-phase flows. In Handbook of Fluids in Motion, Cheremisinoff NP, Gupta R (eds). Butterworth: Stoneham, 1983; 29-67.
6. Patel RD. Non-Newtonian flows. In Handbook of Fluids in Motion, Cheremisinoff NP, Gupta R (eds). Butterworth: Stoneham, 1993; 135-177.
7. Hajivassiliou CA, Carter KB, Finlay IG. Anorectal angle enhances faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 1996; 83: 53-56.
8. Hajivassiliou CA, Carter KB, Finlay IG. Assessment of a novel implantable anal sphincter. Dis Colon Rectum 1997; 40: 711-717.
9. Hajivassiliou CA, Finlay IG. Effect of a novel prosthetic anal neosphincter on human colonic blood flow. Br J Surg 1998; 85: 1703-1707.
10. Medical Devices Agency UK. The Classification Rules. Bulletin 10. Department of Health: London, 1995.
11. Jorge JM, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1993; 36: 77-97.
12. Scott FB, Bradley WE, Timm GW. Treatment of urinary incontinence by implantable prosthetic sphincter. Urology 1973; 1: 252-259.
13. Leo ME, Barrett DM. Success of the narrow backed cuff design of the AMS 800 artificial bowel sphincter: analysis of 144 patients. J Urol 1993; 150: 1412-1414.
14. Sofia CA, Rush BF Jr, Koziol J, Rolko JM, Seebode JJ. Experiences with an artificial sphincter to establish continence in dogs. Am Surg 1988; 54: 390-394.
15. Satava RM, King GE. An artificial anal sphincter. Phase 2: implantable sphincter with a perineal colostomy. J Surg Res 1989; 46: 207-211.
16. Christiansen J, Lorentzen M. Implantation of artificial sphincter for anal incontinence. Lancet 1987; ii: 244-245.
17. Hajivassiliou CA, Finlay IG. Uneven pressure application by the artificial urinary sphincter: an explanation for tissue ischaemia? BJU Int 1999; 83: 416-419.
18. Hajivassiliou CA, Carter KB, Finlay IG. Biomechanical evaluation of an artificial anal sphincter prosthesis. J Med Eng Technol 1997; 21: 89-95.
19. Hajivassiliou CA, Greer K, Fisher A, Finlay IG. Non-invasive measurement of colonic blood flow distribution using laser Doppler imaging. Br J Surg 1998; 85: 52-55.
20. Lehur PA, Michot F, Denis P, Grise P, Leborge J, Teniere P et al. Results of artificial sphincter in severe anal incontinence. Report of 14 consecutive implantations. Dis Colon Rectum 1996; 39: 1352-1355.
21. O'Brien PE, Skinner S. Restoring control: the Acticon Neosphincter artificial bowel sphincter in the treatment of anal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43: 1213-1216.
22. Altomare DF, Dodi G, La Torre F, Romano G, Melega E, Rinaldi M. Multicentre retrospective analysis of the outcome of artificial anal sphincter implantation for severe faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 2001; 88: 1481-1486.
23. Vaizey CJ, Kamm MA, Gold DM, Bartram CI, Halligan S, Nicholls RJ. Clinical, physiological, and radiological study of a new purpose-designed artificial bowel sphincter. Lancet 1998; 352: 105-109.
24. Wong WD, Jensen LL, Bartolo DC, Rothenberger DA. Artificial anal sphincter. Dis Colon Rectum 1996; 39: 1345-1351.
25. Savoye G, Leroi AM, Denis P, Michot F. Manometric assessment of an artificial bowel sphincter. Br J Surg 2000; 87: 586-589.
26. Lehur PA, Zerbib F, Neunlist M, Glemain P, Bruley des Varannes S. Comparison of quality of life and anorectal function after artificial sphincter implantation. Dis Colon Rectum 2002; 45: 508-513.
27. Malouf AJ, Vaizey CJ, Kamm MA, Nicholls RJ. Reassessing artificial bowel sphincters. Lancet 2000; 355: 2219-2220.
28. Williams NS, Patel J, George BD, Hallan RI, Watkins ES. Development of an electrically stimulated neoanal sphincter. Lancet 1991; 338: 1166-1169.
29. Chapman AE, Geerdes P, Hewett P, Young J, Eyers T, Kiroff G et al. Systematic review of dynamic graciloplasty in the treatment of faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 2002; 89: 138-153.