Indoor UV tanning operator opinion regarding youth access: An electronic survey

Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology

Volumn 51, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 814-816

  Hester, Eric J ^a   Johnson, Kathryn R ^a   Crane, Lori A ^b   Schilling, Lisa M ^c   Dellavalle, Robert P ^a,d  

^a Dermatology Research   (United States)

^b Preventive Medicine and Biometrics   (United States)

^c Medicine

^d UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CONTROLLED STUDY; E-MAIL; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MALE; OPERATOR; PARENTAL CONSENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SPA TREATMENT; SUN EXPOSURE;

EID: 8744219682     PISSN: 01909622     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2004.05.023     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Levy J. The $4 Billion Tanning Industry. Tanning Trends. Available at: http://www.southernsuntan.com/tanning_trends.htm. Accessed December 4, 2003.
2. C.A. Demko, E.A. Borawski, S.M. Debanne, K.D. Cooper, and K.C. Stange Use of indoor UV tanning facilities by white adolescents in the United States Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 157 2003 854 860
3. A.C. Geller, G. Colditz, S. Oliveria, K. Emmons, C. Jorgensen, and G.N. Aweh Use of sunscreen, sunburning rates, and tanning bed use among more than 10,000 US children and adolescents Pediatrics 109 2002 1009 1014
4. V.E. Cokkinides, M.A. Weinstock, M.C. O'Connell, and M.J. Thun Use of indoor tanning sunlamps by US youth, ages 11-18 years, and by their parent or guardian caregivers: prevalence and correlates Pediatrics 109 2002 1124 1130
5. B.L. Walters, and T.M. Kelley Commercial tanning facilities: a new source of eye injury Am J Emerg Med 5 1987 386 389
6. M. Rhainds, L. De Guire, and J. Claveau A population-based survey on the use of artificial tanning devices in the Province of Quebec, Canada J Am Acad Dermatol 40 1999 572 576
7. J.K. Rivers, P.G. Norris, G.M. Murphy, A.C. Chu, G. Midgley, and J. Morris UVA sunbeds: tanning, photoprotection, acute adverse effects and immunological changes Br J Dermatol 120 1989 767 777
8. J.M. Spencer, and R.A. Amonette Indoor UV tanning: risks, benefits, and future trends J Am Acad Dermatol 33 1995 288 298
9. R.S. Stern, and W. Docken An exacerbation of SLE after visiting a tanning salon JAMA 255 1986 3120
10. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Environmental Health. Ultraviolet Light: A Hazard to Children. AAP Policy Statement. 1999;104:328-33. Available at: http://www.aap.org/policy/re9913.html. Accessed December 4, 2003.
11. M.R. Karagas, V.A. Stannard, L.A. Mott, M.J. Slattery, S.K. Spencer, and M.A. Weinstock Use of tanning devices and risk of basal cell and squamous cell skin cancers J Natl Cancer Inst 94 2002 224 226
12. J. Westerdahl, H. Olsson, A. Masback, C. Ingvar, N. Jonsson, and L. Brandt Use of sunbeds or sunlamps and malignant melanoma in southern Sweden Am J Epidemiol 15 140 1994 691 699
13. A.J. Swerdlow, and M.A. Weinstock Do tanning lamps cause melanoma? An epidemiologic assessment J Am Acad Dermatol 38 1998 89 98
14. M.B. Veierod, E. Weiderpass, M. Thorn, J. Hansson, E. Lund, and B. Armstrong A prospective study of pigmentation, sun exposure, and risk of cutaneous malignant melanoma in women J Natl Cancer Inst 95 2003 1530 1538
15. R.S. Stern, M.C. Weinstein, and S.G. Baker Risk reduction for nonmelanoma skin cancer with childhood sunscreen use Arch Dermatol 122 1986 537 545
16. M. Khlat, A. Vail, M. Parkin, and A. Green Mortality from melanoma in migrants to Australia: variation by age at arrival and duration of stay Am J Epidemiol 135 1992 1103 1113
17. R.P. Dellavalle, E.R. Parker, N. Cersonsky, E.J. Hester, B. Hemme, and D.L. Burkhardt Youth access laws: in the dark at the tanning parlor? Arch Dermatol 139 2003 443 448
18. A.B. Fleisher, W.J. Lee, D.P. Adams, and M.D. Zanolli Tanning facility compliance with state and federal regulations in North Carolina: A poor performance J Am Acad Dermatol 28 1993 212 217
19. C.A. Culley, J.A. Mayer, L. Eckhardt, A.J. Busic, L.F. Eichenfield, and J.F. Sallis Compliance with federal and state legislation by indoor tanning facilities in San Diego J Am Acad Dermatol 44 2001 53 60
20. K. Sheehan E-mail Survey Response Rates: A Review J Computer-Mediated Communication 2001 Jan 6. Available at: http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol6/issue2/ sheehan.html#results Accessed March 12, 2004
21. D. Bachmann, J. Elfrink, and G. Vazzana E-mail and snail mail face off in rematch Marketing Research 11 1999 11 15
22. R. Kent, and M. Lee Using the Internet for market research: A study of private trading on the Internet J Market Research Society 41 1999 377 381
23. B.A. Schuldt, and J.W. Totten Electronic mail vs. mail survey response rates Marketing Research 6 1994 36 39
24. Smith CB. Casting the net: Surveying an Internet population. J Computer Mediated Communication, 3(1). Available at: http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol3/ issue1/smith.html. Accessed March 12, 2004.
25. A.C.B. Tse, K.C. Tse, C.H. Yin, C.B. Ting, K.W. Yi, and K.P. Yee Comparing two methods of sending out questionnaires: E-mail versus mail Journal of the Market Research Society 37 1995 441 446
26. R.P. Dellavalle, L.M. Schilling, A.K. Chen, and E.J. Hester Teenagers in the UV tanning booth? Tax the tan Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 157 2003 845 846