Experimental study of a porous rat tracheal prosthesis made of T40: Long-term survival analysis

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

Volumn 261, Issue 9, 2004, Pages 484-488

  Schultz, P ^a   Vautier, D ^b   Egles, C ^b   Debry, C ^a  

^a HÔPITAL DE HAUTEPIERRE   (France)

^b INSERM   (France)

Author keywords

Histology; Porous titanium; Prosthesis; Survival; Trachea

Indexed keywords

TITANIUM;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CANCER SURVIVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXPERIMENTAL TEST; IMPLANTATION; LARYNGECTOMY; LARYNX; LONG TERM CARE; MALE; NONHUMAN; POROSITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS; RAT; TRACHEA CANCER;

ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BIOPROSTHESIS; ESOPHAGUS; MALE; MATERIALS TESTING; MODELS, ANIMAL; POROSITY; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; RATS; RATS, WISTAR; RISK FACTORS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SURFACE PROPERTIES; SURVIVAL RATE; TITANIUM;

EID: 8644292444     PISSN: 09374477     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00405-003-0717-5     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Amenta PS, Martinez-Hernandez A, Trukstad RL (1996) Repair and regeneration. In: Domjanov I, Linder J (eds) Anderson's pathology, 10th edn. Mosby, St Louis, pp 416-447
2. Borrie J, Redshaw NR, Dobbinson TL (1973) Silastic tracheal bifurcation prosthesis with subterminal Dacron suture cuffs. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 65:956-962
3. Dankert J, Hogt AH, Feijen J (1986) Biomedical polymers: bacterial adhesion, colonisation and infection. Chemical Rubber Company Critical Reviews in Biocompatibility 2:219-301
4. Dayal VS, Joy ML, Moon RE, Lo A, Jares A (1982) Endotracheal artificial larynx. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol [Suppl] 95: 1-32
5. Debry C, Schultz P, Vautier D (2003) Biomaterials in laryngotracheal surgery. J Laryngol Otol 117:113-117
6. Gristina AG (1994) Implant failure and the immuno-incompetent fibro-inflammatory zone. Clin Orthop 298:106-118
7. Kalliyana K (1984) Criteria for developing biomedical devices from polymeric materials. Polym Plast Techno 23:185-192
8. Laing PG, Ferguson AB, Hodge ES (1967) Tissue reaction in rabbit muscle exposed to metallic implants. J Biomed Mater Res 1:135-149
9. Leake D, Habal M, Pizzoferrato A, Vespucci A (1985) Prosthetic replacement of large defects of the cervical trachea in dogs. Biomaterials 6:17-22
10. Mahieu H, Joris M (1986) Oropharynx decontamination preventing Candida vegetation on voice prostheses. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 112:1090-1092
11. Merrit K, Chang C (1991) Factors influencing bacterial adherence to biomaterials. J Biomed App 5:186-203
12. Montgomery WW (1974) Silicone tracheal T tube. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 83:71-75
13. Ranga Rao K (1991) Bioadhesion and factors affecting the bioadhesion of microparticules. High performances. Biomaterials 18:259-268
14. Schultz P, Vautier D, Chluba J, Marcellin L, Debry C (2002) Survival analysis of rats implanted with porous titanium tracheal prosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg 73:1747-1745
15. Tilney NL, Boor PJ (1975) Host response to implanted Dacron grafts. Arch Sur 110:1469-1472
16. Villegas-Cabello O, Vazquez-Juarez JL, Gutierrez-Perez FM, Davila-Cordova RF, Diaz-Montemayor C (1994) Staged replacement of the canine trachea with ringed polyethylene terephtalate grafts. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 42:302-305
17. Williams DF (1973) The deterioration of materials in use. In: Williams DF, Roaf R (eds) Implants in surgery. Saunders, London, pp 137-201