Spatial structure and taxonomy of decomposition in shift-share analysis

Growth and Change

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 476-490

  Nazara, Suahasil ^a   Hewings, Geoffrey J D ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF INDONESIA   (Indonesia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECOMPOSITION ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; SHIFT-SHARE ANALYSIS; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION;

EID: 8644292433     PISSN: 00174815     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2257.2004.00258.x     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Anselin, L., and R. Florax. 1995. New directions in spatial econometrics. Springer-Verlag.
2. Arcelus, F. 1984. An extension of shift-share analysis. Growth and Change 15: 3-8.
3. Bavaud, F. 1998. Models for spatial weights: A systematic look. Geographical Analysis 30: 153-171.
4. Berzeg, K. 1978. The empirical content ofshift-share analysis. Journal of Regional Science 18: 463-469.
5. Berzeg, K. 1984. A note on statistical approaches to shift-share analysis. Journal of Regional Science 24:277-285.
6. Buck, T.W, and M.H. Atkins. 1976. The impact of British regional policies on employment growth. Oxford Economic Papers 28: 118-132.
7. Cliff, A.D., and J.K. Ord. 1981. Spatial processes, models & applications. London: Pion.
8. Dine, M., and K. Haynes. 1999. Source of regional inefficiency: An integrated shift-share, data envelopment analysis and input-output approach. The Annals of Regional Science 33: 469-489.
9. Dunn, E. S. 1960. A statistical and analytical technique for regional analysis. Papers of the Regional Science Association 6: 97-112.
10. Esteban-Marquillas, J.M. 1972. A reinterpretation of shift-share analysis. Regional and Urban Economics 2: 249-255.
11. Griffith, D.A. 2003. Spatial autocorrelation and spatial filtering Springer-Verlag.
12. Haynes, K., and Z.B. Machunda. 1987. Considerations in extending shift-share analysis: Note. Growth and Change Spring 1987: 69-78.
13. Haynes, K., and M. Dine. 1997. Productivity change in manufacturing regions: A multifactor/shiftshare approach. Growth and Change 28: 201-221.
14. Isard, Walter. 1960. Methods of regional analysis: An introduction to regional science. MIT Press.
15. Klaasen, L.H., and J.H.P. Paelinck. 1972. Asymmetry in shift-share analysis. Regional Science and Urban Economics 2: 256-261.
16. Keil, S.R. 1992. On the value of homotheticity in the shift-share framework. Growth and Change 23: 469-493.
17. Loveridge, S., and A.C. Selting. 1998. A review and comparison of shift-share identities. International Regional Science Review 21: 37-58.
18. Paelinck, J.H., and P. Nijkamp. 1975. Operational theory and method in regional economics. Saxon House.
19. Patterson M. 1991. A note on the formulation of a full-analogue regression model of the shift-share method. Journal of Regional Science 31: 211-216.
20. Rosenfeld, F. 1959. Commentaire Uexposé de M. Dunn. Economie Appliquee 4: 531-534.
21. Sakashita, N. 1973. An axiomatic approach to shift-share analysis. Regional and Urban Economics 3: 263-272.
22. Stevens, B.H., and C.L. Moore. 1980. A critical review of the literature on shift-share as a forecasting technique. Journal of Regional Science 20: 419-437.
23. Theil, H., and R. Gosh. 1980. A comparison of shift-share and the RAS adjustment. Regional Science and Urban Economics 10: 175-180.
24. Tobler, W. 1979. Cellular geography, in S. Gale and G. Olsson, Philosophy in geography, pp. 379-386, Dordrecht: Reidel.