Evaluation of AFLP in Poinsettia: Polymorphism selection, analysis, and cultivar identification

Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science

Volumn 129, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 863-869

  Parks, Elizabeth J ^a   Moyer, James W ^a  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

DNA; Fingerprinting; Floral crop; Genetic analysis; Intracultivar variation; Molecular differentiation

Indexed keywords

EMBRYOPHYTA; EUPHORBIA; EUPHORBIA PULCHERRIMA;

EID: 8644269779     PISSN: 00031062     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.21273/jashs.129.6.0863     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Barcaccia, G., E.E. Albertini, and M. Falcinelli. 1999. AFLP fingerprinting in Pelargonium peltatum: Its development and potential in cultivar identification. J. Hort. Sci. Biotechnol. 74:243-250.
2. Beyermann, B., P. Nurnberg, A. Weihe, M. Meixner, J.T. Epplen, and T. Borner. 1992. Fingerprinting plant genomes with oligonucleotide probes specific for simple repetitive DNA sequences. Theor. Appl. Genet. 83:691-694.
3. Carr, J., M. Xu, J.W. Dudley, and S.S. Korban. 2003. AFLP analysis of the genetic variability in New Guinea impatiens. Theor. Appl. Genet. 106:1509-1516.
4. Dice, L.R. 1945. Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species. Ecology 26:297-302.
5. Ellis, R.P., J.W. McNicol, E. Baird, A. Booth, P. Lawrence, B. Thomas, and W. Powell. 1997. The use of AFLPs to examine genetic relatedness in barley. Mol. Breeding 3:359-369.
6. Esselink, G.D., M.J.M. Smulders, and B. Vosman. 2003. Identification of cut rose (Rosa hybrida) and rootstock varieties using robust sequence tagged microsatellite site markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 106:277-286.
7. Han, T.H., H.J.v. Eck, M.J.d. Jeu, and E. Jacobsen. 1999. Optimization of AFLP fingerprinting of organisms with a large-sized genome: a study on Alstroemeria spp. Theor. Appl. Genet. 98:465-471.
8. Han, T.H., M. de Jeu, H. van Eck, and E. Jacobsen. 2000. Genetic diversity of Chilean and Brazilian Alstroemeria species assessed by AFLP analysis. Heredity 84:564-569.
9. Hill, M., H. Witsenboer, M. Zabeau, P. Vos, R. Kesseli, and R. Michelmore. 1996. PCR-based fingerprinting using AFLPs as a tool for studying genetic relationships in Lactuca spp. Theor. Appl. Genet. 93:1202-1210.
10. Jaccard, P. 1908. Nouvelles recherches sur la distribution florale. Bulletin de la Société Vaudoise des sciences naturelles 44:223-270.
11. Jones, C.J., K.J. Edwards, S. Castaglione, M.O. Winfield, F. Sala, C.v.d. Wiel, G. Bredemeijer, B. Vosman, M. Matthes, and S. Daly. 1997. Reproducibility of RAPD, AFLP and SSR markers in plants by a network of European laboratories. Mol. Breeding 3:381-390.
12. Lance, G.N. and W.T. Williams. 1967. A general theory of classificatory sorting strategies. Hierarchical systems. Computer J. 9:373-380.
13. Ling, J.T., R. Sauve, and N. Gawel. 1997. Identification of poinsettia cultivars using RAPD markers. HortScience 32:122-124.
14. Lynch, M.. Estimation of relatedness by DNA fingerprinting. 1988. Mol. Biol. Evolution 5:584-599.
15. Mace, E.S., R.N. Lester, and C.G. Gebhardt. 1999. AFLP analysis of genetic relationships among the cultivated eggplant, Solanum melongena L., and wild relatives (Solanaceae). Theor. Appl. Genet. 99:626-633.
16. Peltier, D., E. Farcy, H. Dulieu, and A. Berville. 1994. Origin, distribution and mapping of RAPD markers from wild Petunia species in Petunia hybrida Hort lines. Theor. Appl. Genet. 88:637-645.
17. Sneath, P.H.and R.R. Sokal. 1973. Numerical taxonomy. Freeman, San Fransisco.
18. Sokal, R.R. and C.D. Michener. 1958. A statistical method for evaluating systematic relationships. Univ. Kansas Sci. Bul. 38:1409-1438.
19. Starman T.W. and S. Abbitt. 1997. Distinguishing poinsettia cultivars and evaluating their genetic relationships using DNA fingerprinting. HortScience 32:499. (Abstr.)
20. Starman, T.W., X. Duan, and S. Abbitt. 1999. Nucleic acid scanning techniques distinguish closely related cultivars of poinsettia. HortScience 34:1119-1122.
21. Tomkins, J.P., T.C. Wood, L.S. Barnes, A. Westman, and R.A. Wing. 2001. Evaluation of genetic variation in the daylily (Hemerocallis spp.) using AFLP markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 102:489-496.
22. U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2003. Agriculture statistics 2003. U.S. Govt. Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
23. Vainstein, A.and H. Ben-Meir. 1994. DNA fingerprinting analysis of roses. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 119:1099-1103.
24. Vos, P., R. Hogers, M. Bleeker, M. Reijans, T. van de Lee, M. Hornes, A. Frijters, J. Pot, J. Peleman, M. Kuiper, and M. Zabeau. 1995. AFLP: A new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res. 23:4407-4414.
25. Weising, W., H. Nybom, K. Wolff, and W. Meyer. 1995. DNA fingerprinting in plants and fungi. 1st ed. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla.
26. Zhang, D., E. Germain, M. Cao, and M.H. Grandelin. 1999. Polymorphism and reproducibility of AFLPs in rose. Plant and Animal Genome VII Conf., San Diego, 17-21 Jan. 1999. (Abstr.)
27. Zhang, L.H., P. Ozias Akins, G. Kochert, S. Kresovich, R. Dean, and W. Hanna. 1999. Differentiation of bermudagrass (Cynodon spp.) genotypes by AFLP analyses. Theor. Appl. Genet. 98:895-902.
28. Zhu, H., F. Qu, and L.H. Zhu. 1993. Isolation of genomic DNAs from plants, fungi and bacteria using benzyl chloride. Nucleic Acids Res. 21:5279-5280.