From philosopher king to municipal dog catcher - and beyond

Urban Policy and Research

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 387-400

  Mees, Paul ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 8644267810     PISSN: 08111146     EISSN: 14767244     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08111140008727845     Document Type: Review

References (31)

1. Arnstein, S., 1969. ‘A ladder of citizen participation’. AIP Journal, 35 (4): 216–24.
2. Carter, R., 1983. ‘The effect of proposed district centres on Melbourne's Central Business District’. Urban Policy and Research, 1 (1): 2–7.
3. Davis, D., 1978. ‘Mass transit and private ownership: An alternative perspective on the case of Toronto’. Urban History Review, 3–78: 60–98.
4. Dear, M., 2000. The Postmodern Urban Condition, London: Blackwell.
5. Fischer, K. F. 1984. Canberra, Myths and Models: Forces at Work in the Formation of the Australian Capital, Hamburg: Institute of Asian Affairs.
6. Frisken, F., 1984. “ ‘A triumph for public ownership: The Toronto Transportation Commission 1921–1953’ ”. In Forging a Consensus: Historical Essays on Toronto, Edited by: Russell, V. L., Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
7. Gleeson, B., and Low, N., 2000. Australian Urban Planning: New Challenges, New Agendas, Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
8. Goodman, R., 1972. After the Planners, London: Penguin.
9. GVRD (Greater Vancouver Regional District). 1993. Creating Our Future: Steps to a More Livable Region Vancouver
10. GVRD. 1996. Livable Region Strategic Plan Vancouver
11. Hauer, E., 1994. ‘Can one estimate the value of life or is it better to be dead than stuck in traffic?’. Transportation Research A, 28A (2): 109–18.
12. Healey, P., 1997. Collaborative Planning, London: Macmillan.
13. Hensher, D., 1993. ‘The transportation sector in Australia: Economic issues and challenges’. Transport Policy, 1 (1): 49–67.
14. Lee, D., 1973. ‘A requiem for large-scale models’. AIP Journal, 39 (3): 163–78.
15. Littlechild, S., 1978. The Fallacy of the Mixed Economy, London: Institute of Economic Affairs.
16. McLoughlin, J. B. 1969. Urban and Regional Planning: A Systems Approach, London: Faber & Faber.
17. McLoughlin, J. B. 1992. Shaping Melbourne's Future? Town Planning, the State and Civil Society, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Mees, P., 1999. ‘Editorial’. Urban Policy and Research, 17 (1): 4–5.
19. Mees, P., 2000. A Very Public Solution: Transport in the Dispersed City, Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.
20. NCDC (National Capital Development Commission). 1984. Metropolitan Canberra: Policy Plan, Development Plan Canberra
21. Paterson, J., The changing nature of planning: From philosopher king to municipal dog catcher. plenary paper presented to 14th RAPI Congress. Adelaide. (sadly, unpublished)
22. Pius XI (Pope). Encyclical Letter Quadragesimo Anno: On Reconstructing the Social Order. National Catholic Welfare Conference. Washington.
23. PRP (Powerline Review Panel). 1989. Final Report Melbourne
24. RCEP (Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution). 1994. Eighteenth Report: Transport and the Environment, London: HMSO. Cmnd 2674
25. Roth, G., 1984. “ ‘The overseas experience’ ”. In Urban Transit: The Private Challenge to Public Transportation, Edited by: Lave, C., San Francisco: Pacific Institute for Policy Studies.
26. Sandercock, L., 1998. Towards Cosmopolis: Planning for Multicultural Cities, Chichester: John Wiley.
27. Schumacher, E. F. 1973. Small Is Beautiful: A Study of Economics As If People Mattered, London: Blond & Briggs.
28. Self, P., 1993. Government by the Market?: The Politics of Public Choice, London: Macmillan.
29. Self, P., 1999. Rolling Back the Market: Economic Dogma and Political Choice, London: Macmillan.
30. Smith, N., and Hensher, D., 1998. ‘The future of exclusive busways: The Brazilian experience’. Transport Reviews, 18 (2): 131–52.
31. SPA (State Planning Authority of NSW). 1968. Sydney Region: Outline Plan 1970–2000 AD Sydney