Experiment on magnetic flux leakage inspection of oil-gas pipeline

Tianjin Daxue Xuebao (Ziran Kexue yu Gongcheng Jishu Ban)/Journal of Tianjin University Science and Technology

Volumn 37, Issue 8, 2004, Pages 686-689

  Yang, Tao ^a   Wang, Tai Yong ^a   Li, Qing ^a   Leng, Yong Gang ^a  

^a TIANJIN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Experimental study; Magnetic flux leakage; Non destructive inspection; Pipeline

Indexed keywords

GAS PIPELINES; MAGNETIC FLUX; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SIGNAL DETECTION;

MAGNETIC FLUX LEAKAGE; NONDESTRUCTIVE INSPECTION; OIL GAS PIPELINE; QUANTITATIVE RECOGNITION;

PETROLEUM PIPELINES;

EID: 8644265162     PISSN: 04932137     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Leonard S, Atherton D L. Calculations of the effects of anisotropy on magnetic flux leakage detector signals [J]. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 1996, 32(3): 1905-1909.
2. Eduardo Altschuler. Nonlinear model of flaw detection in steel pipes by magnetic flux leakage [J]. NDT and E International, 1995, 28(1): 35-38.
3. Yang Lijian, Chen Xiaochun, Wei Jing. Signal processing technology in oil-gas pipeline magnetic flux leakage inspection [J]. Journal of Shenyang Polytechnic University, 1999, 21(6): 516-518 (in Chinese).
4. Wang Taiyong, Jiang Qi. Study on quantitative recognition technology of pipeline defect [J]. Journal of Tianjin University, 2003, 36(1): 55-58 (in Chinese).
5. Zhong Weichang. Progress of magnetic dipole theory research in China during recent twenty years [J]. NDT, 2000, 22(12): 551-554 (in Chinese).
6. Xie Yuan, Kang Yihua. A mathematical model for the magnetic leakage field due to pipe seam in steel pipe [J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology, 2002, 24(1): 42-45 (in Chinese).