Assessing the relationship between investigator global evaluation and acne lesion counts

Drug Information Journal

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 343-351

  Alosh, Mohamed ^a,c   Wilkin, Jonathan ^b,c  

^a Division of Biometrics III   (United States)

^b Office of Drug Evaluation V   (United States)

^c CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

Acne trials; Lesion counts; Logistic regression

Indexed keywords

CONTRACEPTIVE AGENT; PLACEBO;

ACNE; ACNE LESION COUNT; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL COUNT; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; DRUG EFFICACY; EVALUATION; HUMAN; INVESTIGATOR GLOBAL EVALUATION; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MENSTRUAL CYCLE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ASSAY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SKIN DEFECT; TREATMENT FAILURE;

EID: 8644247663     PISSN: 00928615     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/009286150403800405     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Wilkin J. A metric for acneiform eruptions of the face: Investigations into the paradox of the ordinal scale of greater utility and interval scale of greater accuracy. In: Schwindt DA, Maibach HI, eds. Cutaneous Biometrics. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers; 2000.
2. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. A goodness-of-fit test for the multiple logistic regression model. Comm Stat. 1980; A10:1043-1069.
3. Hosmer DW, Hosmer T, le Cessie S, Lemeshow S. A comparison of goodness-of-fit tests for the logistic regression model. Stat Med. 1997;16:965-980.
4. Hosmer DW, Hjort NL. Goodness-of-fit processes for logistic regression: simulation results. Stat Med. 2002;21:2723-2738.
5. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 1989.
6. Collett D. Modelling Binary Data. Boca Raton, Florida: Chapman and Hall/CRC; 1991.