Pros and cons of replacing discrete logic with programmable logic in introductory digital logic courses

ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2000, Pages 4871-4877

  Nickels, Kevin ^a  

^a TRINITY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DESIGN COMPLEXITY; DIGITAL DESIGN; DISCRETE LOGICS; PEDAGOGIC COST;

FUNCTIONS; INTEGRATED CIRCUITS; PROBLEM SOLVING; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; STUDENTS; TRANSISTORS;

PROGRAMMABLE LOGIC CONTROLLERS;

EID: 8644239431     PISSN: 01901052     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (7)

1. W. A. Chren and B. G. Zomberg. Programmable logic course development in an engineering curriculum. In Proceedings American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, pages 1154-1158, 1993.
2. R. Coowar. Designing with field programmable gate arrays. In Proceedings American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference., pages 853-859, 1995.
3. R. M. Felder and L. K. Silverman. Learning and teaching styles in engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 77(2), February 1988.
4. D. W. Horning. Integration of digital design tools into a digital design sequence. In Proceedings American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, pages 1104-1108, 1993.
5. R. Katz. Contemporary Logic Design. Benjamin/Cummings, California, 1994.
6. M. M. Mano and C. R. Kime. Logic and Computer Design Fundamentals. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 2nd edition, 1997.
7. A. K. Ojha. Implementation of an undergraduate laboratory on programmable logic devices. In Proceedings American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, pages 846-852, 1995.