How bison and elk populations impact park visitation: A comparison of results from a survey and a historic visitation regression model

Society and Natural Resources

Volumn 17, Issue 10, 2004, Pages 941-949

  Loomis, John ^a  

^a Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences   (United States)

Author keywords

Intended behavior; National park; Recreation; Validity; Visitors

Indexed keywords

NATIONAL PARK; OUTDOOR RECREATION; RECREATIONAL MANAGEMENT; TOURIST ATTRACTION;

GRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES; WESTERN HEMISPHERE; WORLD; WYOMING;

BISON; BUBALUS; CERVUS ELAPHUS;

EID: 8644237365     PISSN: 08941920     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08941920490505338     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Ajzen, I. 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Org. Hum. Decision Processes 59:179-211.
2. Ajzen, I. and M. Fishbein. 1980. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
3. Barro, S., M. Manfredo, T. C. Brown, and G. Peterson. 1996. Examination of the predictive validity of CVM using attitude behavior framework. Society Nat. Resources 9:111-124.
4. Chase, L., D. Lee, W. Schulze, and D. Anderson. 1998. Ecotourism demand and differential pricing of national park access in Costa Rica. Land Econ. 74:466-482.
5. Grijalva, T., R. Berrens, A. Bohara, and W. Shaw. 2002. Testing the validity of contingent behavior trip responses. Am. J. Agric. Econ 84:401-414.
6. Weiler, S., J. Loomis, R. Richardson, and S. Schwiff. 2003. Driving regional economic models with a statistical model: Hypothesis testing for economic impact analysis. Rev. Regional Stud. 32:97-111.
7. Whitehead, J. C., T. C. Haab, and J. Huang. 2000. Measuring recreation benefits of quality improvements with revealed and stated behavior data. Resource Energy Econ. 22:339-354.