Negative differential Rashba effect in two-dimensional hole systems

Applied Physics Letters

Volumn 85, Issue 15, 2004, Pages 3151-3153

  Habib, B ^a   Tutuc, E ^a   Melinte, S ^a   Shayegan, M ^a   Wasserman, D ^a   Lyon, S A ^a   Winkler, R ^b  

^a Princeton University   (United States)

^b LEIBNIZ UNIVERSITY HANNOVER   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BULK INVERSION ASYMMETRY (BIA); DENSITY CONSTANT; DIFFERENTIAL RASHBA EFFECT; SPINTRONIC DEVICES;

BAND STRUCTURE; DENSITY (OPTICAL); ELECTRIC FIELD EFFECTS; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; FERROMAGNETIC MATERIALS; HETEROJUNCTIONS; NATURAL FREQUENCIES; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; PERTURBATION TECHNIQUES;

HOLE MOBILITY;

EID: 8644235885     PISSN: 00036951     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.1806543     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. H. L. Stormer, Z. Schlesinger, A. Chang, D. C. Tsui, A. C. Gossard, and W. Wiegmann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 126 (1983).
2. A. D. Wieck, E. Batke, D. Heitmann, J. P. Kotthaus, and E. Bangert, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 493 (1984).
3. J. P. Eisenstein, H. L. Störmer, V. Narayanamurti, A. C. Gossard, and W. Wiegmann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 2579 (1984).
4. U. Rössler, F. Malcher, and G. Lommer, in High Magnetic Fields in Semiconductor Physics II, edited by G. Landwehr (Springer, Berlin, 1989), p. 376.
5. See, e.g., R. Winkler, Spin-Orbit Coupling Effects in Two-Dimensional Electron and Hole Systems (Springer, Berlin, 2003), and references therein.
6. See, e.g., D. D. Awschalom and J. M. Kikkawa, Phys. Today 52, 33 (1999); B. T. Jonker, Proc. IEEE 91, 727 (2003).
7. See, e.g., D. D. Awschalom and J. M. Kikkawa, Phys. Today 52, 33 (1999); B. T. Jonker, Proc. IEEE 91, 727 (2003).
8. S. Datta and B. Das, Appl. Phys. Lett. 56, 665 (1990).
9. A. F. Morpurgo, J. P. Heida, T. M. Klapwijk, B. J. van Wees, and G. Borghs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1050 (1998).
10. J.-B. Yau, E. P. De Poortere, and M. Shayegan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 146801 (2002).
11. Y. A. Bychkov and E. I. Rashba, J. Phys. C 17, 6039 (1984).
12. For experimental results, see e.g., J. P. Lu, J. B. Yau, S. P. Shukla, M. Shayegan, L. Wissinger, U. Rössler, and R. Winkler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1282 (1998); S. J. Papadakis, E. P. De Poortere, M. Shayegan, and R. Winkler, Physica E (Amsterdam) 9, 31 (2001).
13. For experimental results, see e.g., J. P. Lu, J. B. Yau, S. P. Shukla, M. Shayegan, L. Wissinger, U. Rössler, and R. Winkler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1282 (1998); S. J. Papadakis, E. P. De Poortere, M. Shayegan, and R. Winkler, Physica E (Amsterdam) 9, 31 (2001).
14. M. G. Pala, M. Governale, J. König, U. Zülicke, and G. Iannaccone, Phys. Rev. B 69, 045304 (2004).
15. S. Keppeler and R. Winkler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 046401 (2002).
16. R. Winkler, S. J. Papadakis, E. P. De Poortere, and M. Shayegan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 713 (2000).
17. R. Winkler and U. Rössler, Phys. Rev. B 48, 8918 (1993).
18. F. Stern, Phys. Rev. Lett. 33, 960 (1974).
19. H.-R. Trebin, U. Rössler, and R. Ranvaud, Phys. Rev. B 20, 686 (1979).
20. The slopes of the experimental and calculated curves are the important parameters for comparison. A reference point on the E⊥ axis, which would allow a direct comparison of the measured and calculated results, is very hard to define because of uncertainties in the sample parameters.
21. F. Stern, Phys. Rev. B 5, 4891 (1972).
22. R. Winkler, H. Noh, E. Tutuc, and M. Shayegan, Phys. Rev. B 65, 155303 (2002).