Effects of phonemic awareness instruction on the encoding skills of children with severe speech impairment

Disability and Rehabilitation

Volumn 26, Issue 21-22, 2004, Pages 1295-1304

  Blischak, D M ^a   Shah, S D ^a   Lombardino, L J ^a   Chiarella, K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; AWARENESS; CASE REPORT; CHILD; CHILDHOOD DISEASE; CORRESPONDENCE ANALYSIS; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE DISABILITY; MALE; PHONEME; PHONETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; READING; RELIABILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SKILL; SPEECH DISORDER; SPEECH REHABILITATION; SPEECH THERAPY; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

ARTICULATION DISORDERS; AWARENESS; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVENTION STUDIES; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; MALE; PHONETICS; PROGNOSIS; RISK FACTORS; SAMPLING STUDIES; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SPEECH DISORDERS; SPEECH PERCEPTION; SPEECH PRODUCTION MEASUREMENT; SPEECH THERAPY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 8644235806     PISSN: 09638288     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09638280412331280325     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Bishop K, Rankin J, Mirenda P. Impact of graphic symbol use on reading acquisition. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1994; 10: 113-125.
2. Koppenhaver DA, Coleman PP, Kalman SL, Yoder DE. The implications of emergent literacy research for children with developmental disabilities. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 1991; 1: 38-44.
3. Fried-Oken M, Bersani H. Speaking Up and Spelling it Out: Personal Essays on Augmentative and Alternative Communication. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes, 2000.
4. Smith MM. Reading abilities of non-speaking students: Two case studies. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1992; 8 57-66.
5. Koppenhaver DA, Yoder DE. Literacy issues in persons with severe speech and physical impairments. In: R Gaylord-Ross (ed) Issues and Research in Special Education Vol. New York: Teacher's College Press, 1992; 156-201.
6. Smith MM, Blischak DM. Literacy. In: LL Lloyd, DR Fuller, HH Arvidson (eds) Augmentative and Alternative Communication: Handbook of Principles and Practices. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon, 1997; 414-444.
7. Stanovich KE. Refining the phonological core deficit model. Child Psychology and Psychiatry Review 1998; 3: 17-21.
8. Shaywitz S. Overcoming Dyslexia: A New and Complete Science-Based Program for Reading Problems at any Level. New York: AA Knopf, 2003.
9. Adams MJ. Beginning to Read: Thinking and Learning about Print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1990.
10. Tunmer WE, Nesdale AR. Phonemic segmentation skill and beginning reading. Journal of Educational Psychology 1985; 77 417-527.
11. Ehri LC, Wilce LS. Does learning to spell help beginners learn to read words? Reading Research Quarterly 1987; 22: 47-65.
12. Uhri JK, Shepherd MJ. Segmentation, spelling instruction as part of a first grade reading program: Effects on several measures of reading. Reading Research Quarterly 1993; 28: 218-233.
13. Uhri JK. The spelling/reading connection and dyslexia: Can spelling be used to teach the alphabetic strategy? In: RM Joshi, CK Leong (eds) Reading Disabilities: Diagnosis and Component Processes. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1993; 253-266.
14. Lindamood CH, Lindamood PC. Lindamood Auditory Conceptualization Test. Boston: Teaching Resources Corporation, 1971.
15. Mann VA. Longitudinal predictions and prevention of early reading difficulty. Annals of Dyslexia 1984; 34: 115-136.
16. Rosner J, Simon DP. The auditory analysis test: An initial report. Journal of Learning Disabilities 1971; 4: 384-392.
17. Perfetti CA, Hogaboam TW. The relationship between single word decoding and reading comprehension skill. Journal of Educational Psychology 1975; 67: 461-469.
18. Stackhouse J. Barrier to literacy development in children with speech and language difficulties. In: DVM Bishop, LB Leonard (eds) Speech and Language Impairments in Children. Philadelphia: Psychology Press, 2000; 73-97.
19. Gillon GT. The efficacy of phonological awareness intervention for children with spoken language impairment. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools 2000; 36: 126-141.
20. Gillon GT. Follow-up study investigating the benefits of phonological awareness intervention for children with spoken language impairment. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders 2002; 37: 381-400.
21. Bhat P, Griffin CC, Sindelar T. Phonological awareness instruction for middle school students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly 2003; 26: 73-87.
22. Hohn WE, Ehri LC. Do alphabet letters help pre-readers acquire phonemic segmentation skills? Journal of Education Psychology 1983; 75: 752-762.
23. Ball EW, Blachman BA. Phoneme segmentation training: Effects on reading readiness. Annals of Dyslexia 1988; 38: 208-225.
24. Rivers KO, Lombardino LJ, Thompson CK. Effects of phonological decoding training on children's word recognition of CVC, CV, VC structures. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 1996; 5: 67-78.
25. Rivers KO, Lombardino LJ. Generalization of early metalinguistic skills in a phonological decoding study with first-graders at risk for reading failure. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders 1998; 33: 369-391.
26. Sandberg AD, Hjelmquist E. Phonological awareness and literacy abilities in nonspeaking preschool children with cerebral palsy. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1996; 12: 138-153.
27. Sandberg AD. Reading and spelling, phonological awareness, and working memory in children with severe speech impairments: A longitudinal study. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2001; 17: 11-26.
28. Vandervelden M, Seigel L. Phonological processing and literacy in AAC users and students with motor speech impairments. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1999; 15: 191-211.
29. Bishop DMV. Spelling ability in congenital dysarthria. Evidence against articulatory coding in translating between phonemes and graphemes. Cognitive Neuropsychology 1985; 2: 229-251.
30. Bishop DVM, Robson J. Accurate non-word spelling despite congenital inability to speak: Phoneme-grapheme conversion does not require subvocal articulation. British Journal of Psychology 1989; 80: 1-13.
31. Foley BE, Pollatsek A. Phonological processing and reading abilities in adolescents and adults with severe congenital speech impairments. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1999; 15 156-173.
32. Blischak DM, Gorman A, Lombardino LJ. Application of current literacy theory, research, and clinical practice to AAC users. In: RW Schlosser (ed) The Efficacy of Augmentative and Alternative Communication: Towards Evidence-Based Practice. New York: Academic Press, 2003; 427-448.
33. McReynolds LV, Thompson CK. Flexibility of single-subject experimental designs. Part I: Review of the basics of single-subject designs. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1986; 51: 194-203.
34. Kearns KP. Flexibility of single-subject experimental designs. Part II: Design selection and arrangement of experimental phases. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1986; 51: 204-214.
35. Curtis ME. Development of components of reading skill. Journal of Educational Psychology 1980; 72: 656-669.
36. Stanovich KE, Cunningham AE, Freeman DJ. Intelligence, cognitive skills, early reading progress. Reading Research Quarterly 1984; 19: 278-303.
37. Dunn LM, Dunn LM. Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test. 3rd edn. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service, 1997.
38. Brown L, Sherbenou R, Johnsen S. Test of Nonverbal Intelligence. 2nd edn. Austin, TX: PRO-ED, 1990.
39. Horner RD, Baer DM. Multiple-probe technique: A variation of the multiple baseline. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 1978; 11: 189-196.
40. Ehri LC. Phases of development in learning to read words by sight. Journal of Research in Reading 1995; 18: 116-125.
41. Blischak DM. Phonologic awareness: Implications for individuals with little or no functional speech. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1994; 10: 245-254.
42. Vandervelden MC, Siegel LS. Phonological processing in written word learning: Assessment for children who use augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2001; 17: 37-51.
43. Blischak DM. Increases in natural speech production following experience with synthetic speech. Journal of Special Education Technology 1999; 14: 44-53.