Exchange of information about physical education to support the transition of pupils from primary and secondary school

Educational Research

Volumn 46, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 283-300

  Capel, Susan ^a   Zwozdiak Myers, Paula ^a   Lawrence, Julia ^a  

^a BRUNEL UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Continuity; Liaison activities; Progression; Transfer from primary to secondary

Indexed keywords

EID: 8644228399     PISSN: 00131881     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0013188042000277340     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Birmingham Education Development Centre (1975) Continuity in education: junior to secondary: final report (Birmingham, City of Birmingham Education Department).
2. Capel, S., Zwozdiak-Myers, P. & Lawrence, J. (2003) A study of current practice in liaison between primary and secondary schools in physical education, European Physical Education Review, 9(2), 115-135.
3. Ellis, S. (1999) National Curriculum testing across the interface at KS2 / KS3: a view from the bridge, Curriculum, 20(1), 38-51.
4. Featonby, D. R. (1998) A report on curriculum liaison between junior and secondary schools in County Durham, 1997, Curriculum, 19(2), 68-73.
5. Gorwood, B. (1991) Primary-secondary transfer after the National Curriculum, School Organisation, 11(3), 283-290.
6. Howarth, K. & Head, R. (1988) Curriculum continuity in physical education: a small scale study, British Journal of Physical Education, 19(6), 241-243.
7. Jarman, R. (1990) Primary-secondary science continuity: a new ERA? School Science Review, 71(257), 19-29.
8. Jones, L. P. & Jones, L. (1993) Keeping up the momentum: improving continuity, Education 3-13, October, 46-50.
9. Lance, A. (1994) The case for continuity, Forum, 36(2), 46-47.
10. McCallum, B. (1996) The transfer and use of assessment between primary and secondary schools, British Journal of Curriculum and Assessment, 16(3), 10-14.
11. National Foundation for Educational Research (1995) Continuity and progression 5-16: development in schools (Slough, NFER).
12. Office for Standards in Education (OFSTED) (2002) Changing schools: an evaluation of the effectiveness of transfer arrangements at age 11 (HMI 550) (London, The Stationery Office).
13. School Curriculum Assessment Authority (SCAA) (1996) Promoting continuity between key stage 2 and key stage 3 (London, SCAA).
14. Simpson, M. & Goulder, J. (1998) Promoting continuity and progression, Scottish Educational Review, 30(1), 15-28.
15. Talbot,M. (1996) Gender and National Curriculum physical education, British Journal of Physical Education, Spring, 5-7.