Pike (Esox lucius L.) stocking as a biomanipulation tool. 1. Effects on the fish population in Lake Lyng, Denmark

Hydrobiologia

Volumn 342-343, Issue , 1997, Pages 311-318

  Berg, Søren ^a   Jeppesen, Erik ^b   Søndergaard, Martin ^b  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

^b NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Denmark)

Author keywords

0+ planktivores; Biomanipulation; Pike mortality; Pike stocking; Pike perch interaction; Predation

Indexed keywords

ESOX LUCIUS; GYMNOCEPHALUS CERNUUS; PERCA FLUVIATILIS; RUTILUS RUTILUS; SCARDINIUS ERYTHROPHTHALMUS;

EID: 8544270881     PISSN: 00188158     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-5648-6_32     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Bagenal, J. & I. Tesch, 1978. Age and growth. In Bagenal, T., (ed.), Methods for Assessment of Fish Production in Fresh Waters. IBP Handbook No 3, Blackwell Scientific Publications Ltd., Oxford, London, Edinburgh, Melbourne: 101-136.
2. Bean, C. W. & I. J. Winfield, 1995. Habitat use and activity patterns of roach (Rutilus rutilus (L.)), rudd (Scardinius erythrophthalmus (L.)), perch (Perca fluviatilis L.) and pike (Esox lucius L.) in the laboratory: the role of predation threat and structure complexity. Ecol. Freshwat. Fish 4: 37-46.
3. Benndorf, J., 1990. Conditions for effective biomanipulation; conclusions derived from whole-lake experiments in Europe. Hydrobiologia 200/201: 187-203.
4. Berg, S., E. Jeppesen, M. Søndergaard & E. Mortensen, 1994. Environmental effects of introducing whitefish, Coregonus lavaretus (L.), in Lake Ring. Hydrobiologia 275/276: 71-79.
5. Beyerle, G. B. & J. E. Williams, 1968. Some observations of food selectivity by northern pike in aquaria. Trans, am. Fish. Soc. 97: 28-31.
6. Eklöv, P. & S. F. Hamrin, 1989. Predatory efficiency and prey selection: interactions between pike Esox lucius, perch Perca fluviatilis and rudd Scardinius erythropthalmus. Oikos 56: 149-156.
7. Giles, R., R. M. Wright & M. E. Nord, 1986. Cannibalism in pike fry, Esox lucius L.: some experiments with fry densities. J. Fish Biol. 29: 107-113.
8. Grimm, M. P., 1981. Intraspecific predation as a principal factor controlling the biomass of northern pike (Esox lucius L.). Fish. Mgmt 77-80.
9. Grimm, M. P., 1983. Regulation of biomasses of small (<41 cm) northern pike (Esox lucius L.), with special reference to the contribution of individuals stocked as fingerlings (46 cm). Fish. Mgmt 4: 115-134.
10. Grimm, M. P., 1989. Northern pike (Esox lucius L.) and aquatic vegetation, tools in the management of fisheries and water quality in shallow waters. Hydrobiol. Bull. 23: 59-65.
11. Hunt, B. P. & W. F. Carbine, 1951. Food of young pike, Esox lucius L., and associated fishes in Peterson's ditches, Houghton Lake, Michigan. Trans, am. Fish. Soc. 80: 67-83.
12. Jacobsen, L., M. R. Perrow, F. Landkildehus, M. Hjørne, T. L. Lauridsen & S. Berg, 1997. Interactions between piscivores, zooplanktivores and Zooplankton in submerged macrophytes: preliminary observations from enclosure and pond experiments. Hydrobiologia 342/343: 197-205.
13. Jensen, L. N., 1994. Macrophytes as a structuring factor for juvenile perch (Perca fluviatilis) and roach (Rutilus rutilus) in Lake Stigsholm. Danmarks Miljøundersøgelser og Biologisk Institut, Odense Universitet. M.Sc.-thesis, 70 pp. (in Danish)
14. Jeppesen, E., J. P. Jensen, P. Kristensen, M. Søndergaard, E. Mortensen, O. Sortkjær & K. Olrik, 1990. Fish manipulation as a lake restoration tool in shallow eutrophic temperate lakes 2: threshold levels, long-term stability and conclusions. Hydrobiologia 200/201: 219-227.
15. Kudrinskaya, O. M., 1970. Food and temperature as factors affecting the growth, development and survival of pike-perch and perch larvae. J. Ichthyol. 10: 779-788.
16. Lauridsen, T. L., E. Jeppesen & M. Søndergaard, 1994. Colonization and succession of submerged macrophytes in shallow Lake Væng during the first five years following fish manipulation. Hydrobiologia 275/276: 233-242.
17. Mortensen, E., H. J. Jensen, J. P. Müller & M. Timmermann, 1990. Monitoring programme t;sh investigations in lakes. Investigation programme, fishing gear, and methods. Teknisk anvisning fra DMU, nr. 3. National Environmental Research Institute: 60 pp. (in Danish).
18. Persson, L., G Andersson, S. F. Hamrin & L. Johansson, 1988. Predation regulation and primary production along the productivity gradient of temperate lake exosystems. In Carpenter, S. R. (ed.), Complex interactions in lake communities. Springer Verlag: 45-65.
19. Prejs, A., A. Martyniak, S. Boron, P. Hliwa & P. Koperski, 1994. Food web manipulation in a small, eutrophic Lake Wirbel, Poland: effect of stocking with pike on planktivorous fish. Hydrobiologia 275/276: 65-70.
20. Raat, A. P. J., 1988. Synopsis of biological data on northern pike (Esox lucius L.). FAO fisheries synopsis (145), 178 pp.
21. Shapiro, J., V. Lamarra & M. Lynch, 1975. Biomanipulation: an ecosystem approach to lake restoration. In P. L. Brezonik & J. L. Fox (eds), Water quality management through biological control. Report no. ENV-07-75-1, University of Florida, Gainsville, 85 -96.
22. Søndergaard, M., E. Jeppesen & S. Berg, 1997. Pike (Esox lucius L.) stocking as a biomanipulation tool, 2. Effects on the lower trophic levels in Lake Lyng, Denmark. Hydrobiologia 342/343: 319-325.
23. Turner, A. M. & G. Mittlebach, 1990. Predator avoidance and community structure: interactions among piscivores, planktivores, and plankton. Ecology 71: 2241-2254.
24. Urho, L., 1994. Removal of fish by predators - theoretical aspects. In Cowx, I. (ed.), Rehabilitation of Freshwater Fisheries. Fishing News Books, Oxford: 93-101.
25. Walls, M., I. Kortelainen & J. Sarvala, 1990. Prey responses to fish predation in freshwater communities. Ann. Zool. Fennici 27: 183-199.
26. Van Donk, E., R. D. Gulati & M. P. Grimm, 1989. Food web manipulation in lake Zwemlust: positive and negative effects during the first two years. Hydrobiol. Bull. 23: 19-34.
27. Youngs, W. D. & D. S. Robson, 1978. Estimation of population number and mortality rates. In Bagenal, T. (ed.), Methods for Assessment of Fish Production in Fresh Waters. IBP Handbook No 3, Blackwell Scientific Publications Ltd., Oxford, London, Edinburgh, Melbourne: 137-164.