A study on asymmetry of spatial visual field by analysis of the fMRI BOLD response

Brain Topography

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 39-46

  Chen, Huafu ^a   Yao, Dezhong ^a   Liu, Zuxiang ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ELECTRONIC SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OF CHINA   (China)

^b Beijing Cognitive Lab   (China)

Author keywords

BOLD model; Functional MRI; Lower visual field; Upper visual field; Visual field

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BLOOD OXYGENATION; BRAIN DEPTH STIMULATION; BRAIN FUNCTION; BRAIN PERFUSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; NERVE POTENTIAL; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; NORMAL DISTRIBUTION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REACTION TIME; SPATIAL MEMORY; VISUAL FIELD;

ALGORITHMS; BRAIN MAPPING; CEREBROVASCULAR CIRCULATION; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; NORMAL DISTRIBUTION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL FIELDS; VISUAL PATHWAYS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 8544265308     PISSN: 08960267     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/B:BRAT.0000047335.00110.6a     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Bilodeau, L. and Faubert, J. Isoluminance and chromatic motion throughout the visual field. Vision Research, 1997, 37: 2073-2081.
2. Birn, R.M, Saad, Z.S. and Bandettini, P.A. Spatial heterogeneity of the nonlinear dynamics in the fMRI BOLD response. Neurolmage, 2001, 14: 817-826.
3. Buxton, R.B., Liu, T.T and Wong, E.C. Nonlinearity of the hemodynamic response: modeling the neural and BOLD contributions. Proc. 9th ISMRM, 2001: 1164.
4. Casco, C.D. Spinelli, Left-right visual field asymmetry in bistable motion perception. Perception, 1988, 17: 721-727.
5. Chen, H., Yao, D., Becker, S., Zhuo, Y., Zeng, M. and Chen L. A new method for fMRI data processing: Neighborhood independent component correlation algorithm and its preliminary application. Science in China (Series F). 2002, 45(5):373-382.
6. Chen, H., Yao, D., Zhuo, Y. and Chen L. Analysis of fMRI data by blind separation into independent temporal component. Brain Topography, 2003, 15(4): 223-232.
7. Chen, H., Yao, D. and Yang, L. An extended convolution dynamic model of fMRI BOLD response. Neurocomputing, 2004, in press.
8. Christman, S.D. Local-global processing in the upper versus lower visual fields. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1993, 31: 275-278.
9. Christman, S.D. and Niebauer, C.L. The relation between left-right and upper-lower visual field differences. In: S. Christman (Ed.), Cerebral Asymmetries in Sensory and Perceptual Processing. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1997.
10. Christman, S.D. and Niebauer, C.L. The relation between left-right and upper-lower visual field differences. In: S. Christman (Ed.), Cerebral asymmetries in sensory and perceptual processing. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1997.
11. Cohen, G. Theoretical interpretation of lateral asymmetries. In: J.G. Beaumont (Ed.), Divided Visual Field Studies of Cerebral Organisation. London: Academic Press, 1982.
12. Cox, R.W. AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Comput. Biomed. Res., 1996, 29: 162-173.
13. Di Russo, F., Martínez, A. and Hillyard, S.A. Source analysis of event-related cortical activity during visuo-spatial attention. Cerebral Cortex, May 2003, 13: 486-499.
14. Di Russo, F., Martínez, A., Sereno, M., Pitzalis, S. and Hillyard, S.A. Cortical sources of the early components of the visual evoked potential. Human Brain Mapping, 2001, 15: 95-111.
15. Edwards, M. and Badcock, D.R. Asymmetries in the sensitivity to motion in depth: a centripetal bias. Perception, 1993, 22: 1013-1023.
16. Fukusima, S.S. and Faubert, J. Perceived length in the central visual field: evidence for visual field asymmetries. Vision Research, 2001, 41: 2119-2126.
17. Fristen, K.J. Bayesian estimation of dynamical systems: an application to fMRI. Neuroimage, 2002, 16: 513-530.
18. Fristen, K.J., Mechelli, A., Turner, R. and Price, C.J. Nonlinear responses in fMRI: the balloon model, volterra kernels and other hemodynamics. NeuroImage, 2002, Volume: 12(4): 466-477.
19. Guillaume, M., Habib, B., Philippe, C., Me, P.I. and Jean, B.P. Robust bayesian estimation of the hemodynamic response function in event- related BOLD fMRI using basic physiological information. Human Brain Mapping, 2003, 19: 1-17.
20. Hagenbeek, R.E. and Van Strien, J.W. Left-right and upper-lower visual field asymmetries for face matching, letter naming, and lexical decision. Brain and Cognition, 2002, 49(1): 34-44.
21. He, S., Cavanagh, P. and Intriligator, J. Attentional resolution and the locus of visual a wareness. Nature, 1996, 383: 334-337.
22. Heilman, K.M. and Van Den Abell, T. Right hemisphere dominance for attention: the mechanism underlying hemispheric asymmetries of inattention (neglect), Neurology, 1980, 30: 327-330.
23. Henson, R.N.A., Price, C.J., Rugg, M.D., Turner, R. and Friston, K.J. Detecting latency differences in event related BOLD responses: application to words versus nonwords and initial versus repeated face presentations. NeuroImage, 2001, 15: 83-97.
24. Hwang, K.S., Choi, Y.K. and Jung, J.S. On superior limits for the increments of Gaussian processes. Statistics & Probability Lette, 1997, 35(3): 289-296.
25. Kinsbourne, M. The cerebral basis of lateral asymmetries in attention. Acta. Psychol., (Amsterdam), 1970, 33: 193-201.
26. Kruggel, F., Zysset, S. and Von Cramon, F.D.Y. Nonlinear regression of functional MRI data: an item recognition task study. NeuroImage, 2000, 12: 173-183.
27. Liu, H.L. and Gao, J.H. An investigation of the impulse functions for the nonlinear BOLD response in functional MRI. Mag. Res. Med., 2000, 18: 931-938.
28. Logothetis, N.K., Pauls, J., Augath, M., Trinath, T. and Oeltermann, A. Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal. Nature, 2001, 412: 150-157.
29. Lundervold, A. and Khateeb, I.H. Numerical estimation of the BOLD response in event-related fMRI. Poster at the 25th Annual Mid-Year Meeting of the International Neuropsychological Society, 2002, July 24-27, Stockholm, Sweden.
30. Miller, K.L., Luh, W.M., Liu, T.T, Martinez, A., Obata, T., Wong, E.C., Frank, L.R. and Buxton, R.B. Nonlinear temporal dynamics of the cerebral blood flow response. Human Brain Mapping, 2001, 13: 1-12.
31. Naito, T., Kaneoke, Y., Osaka, N. and Kakigi, R. Asymmetry of the human visual field in magnetic response to apparet motion. Brain Research, 2000, 865: 221-226.
32. Niebauer, C.L. and Christman, S.D. Upper and lower visual field differences in categorical and coordinate judgments. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1998, 5: 147-151.
33. Ogawa, S., Tank, D.W., Menon, R., Ellermann, J. M., Kim, S.G., Merkle, H. and Ugurbil, K. Intrinsic signal changes accompanying sensory stimulation: Functional brain mapping with magnetic resonance imaging. Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. USA, 1992, 89: 5951-5955.
34. Okita, T., Konishi, K., Morotomi, T. and Tanaka, H. Effects of selective attention to upper and lower visual-field pattern stimuli on event-related brain potentials, Jpn. J. Physiol. Psychol. Psychophysiol., 1990, 8: 81-93.
35. Osaka, N. Apparent motion in the upper and lower peripheral visual field. Perception, 1993, 33: S80-S81.
36. Previc, F.H. Functional specialization in the lower and upper visualfields in humans: its ecological origins and neurophysiological implications. Behav. Brain Sci., 1990, 13: 519-575.
37. Previc, F.H., Breitmeyer, B.G. and Weinstein, L.F. Discriminability of random-dot stereograms in three-dimensional space. Int. J. Neurosci., 1995, 80: 247-253.
38. Rieke, F., Warland, D., van Steveninck, R. and Bialek, W. Spikes: exploring the neural code. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997.
39. Rosen, B.R., Buckner R.L. and Dale, A. Event-related functional MRI: past, present, and future. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 1998, 95: 773-780.
40. Rubin, N., Nakayama, K. and Shapley, R. Enhanced perception of illusory contours in the lower versus upper visual hemifields. Science, 1996, 271: 651-653.
41. Sergent, J. The cerebral balance of power: Confrontation or cooperation? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 1982, 8: 253-272.
42. Tanabe, J., Miller, D., Tregellas, J., Freedman, R. and Meyer, F.G. Comparison of detrending methods for optimal fMRI preprocessing. NeuroImage, 2002, 15: 902-907.
43. Toga, W. and Thompson, P.M. Mapping brain asymmetry. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2003, 4: 37-48
44. Underwood, G. and Whitfield, A. Right-hemisphere interactions in picture-word processing, Brain Cogn. 1995, 4: 273-286.
45. Vogel, J.J., Bowers, C.A and Vogel, D.C. Cerebral lateralization of spatial abilities: A meta-analysis. Brain and Cognition, 2003, 52: 197-204.
46. von Grunau, M. and Dube, S. Visual search asymmetry for viewing direction, Percept. Psychophys., 1994, 56: 211-220.
47. Whishaw, I.Q. How do primates reach? Behav. Brain Sci. 1994, 17: 173-174.
48. Yoshizaki, K. Shift toward left visual field advantage after short term learning experience. Int. J. Neurosci., 1990, 55: 113-117.