Outcomes of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines: A systematic review

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 427-433

  Bahtsevani, Christel ^a   Udén, Giggi ^a   Willman, Ania ^a  

^a MALMÖ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Evidence based medicine; Health care; Professional practice; Review literature

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; COST EFFECTIVENESS; DERMATOLOGY; DISEASE CONTROL; HEALTH CARE; HUMAN ENGINEERING; LAWS AND LEGISLATION; PATIENT MONITORING; PUBLIC POLICY;

CLINICAL PRACTISE; MULTILEVEL MODELING; SCIENTIFIC FOUNDATIONS; SOCIAL RULES;

CLINICAL LABORATORIES;

CLINICAL PRACTICE; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; QUALITY CONTROL; REVIEW; SKIN DISEASE; WORK ENVIRONMENT;

EID: 8544219762     PISSN: 02664623     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S026646230400131X     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. Bero LA, Grilli R, Grimshaw JM, et al. Closing the gap between research and practice. An overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings. BMJ. 1998;317:465-468.
2. Britton M. Så graderas en studies vetenskapliga bevisvärde och slutsatsernas styrka [Grading of level of evidence of studies and strength of recommendations] [in Swedish]. Lakartidningen. 2000;97(40):4414-4415.
3. Button D, Roe B, Webb C, et al. Consensus guidelines for the promotion and management of continence by primary health care teams: Development, implementation and evaluation. J Adv Nurs. 1998;27:91-99.
4. Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. Levels of evidence and grades of recommendation. Oxford: 1998. Available at: http://www.cebm.net/ levels_of_evidence.asp. Accessed: September 10, 2003.
5. Dufault MA, Willey-Lessne C. Using a collaborative research utilization model to develop and test the effects of clinical pathways for pain management. J Nurs Care Qual. 1999;13:19-33.
6. Effective Health Care. Getting evidence into practice. NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. The University of York, UK. 1999;5(1):1-16.
7. Flemming K. Asking answerable questions. Evidence Based Nurs. 1998;1:36-37.
8. Giacomini M, Cook D, Guyatt G. Therapy and applying the results qualitative research. In: Guyatt G, Rennie D, eds. Users' guides to the medical literature a manual for evidence-based clinical practice, vol. 1. Chicago: AMA Press; 2002:433-448.
9. Gray JAM. Evidence-based healthcare: How to make health policy and management decisions. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1997.
10. Grimshaw JM, Russel IT. Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: A systematic review or rigorous evaluations. Lancet. 1993;342:1317-1322.
11. Grol R. Beliefs and evidence in changing clinical practice. BMJ. 1997;315:418-421.
12. Grol R, Dalhuijsen J, Thomas S, et al. Attributes of clinical guidelines that influence use of guidelines in general practice: Observational study. BMJ. 1998;317:858-861.
13. Guyatt GH, Sackett DL, Cook DJ. Users' guides to the medical literature II. How to use an article about therapy or prevention. A. Are the results of the study valid? JAMA. 1993;270:2598-2601.
14. Guyatt GH, Sackett DL, Cook, DJ. Users' guides to the medical literature II. How to use an article about therapy or prevention. B. What were the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? JAMA. 1994;271:59-63.
15. Lund CH, Kuller J, Lane AT, et al. Neonatal skin care: Evaluation of the AWHONN/NANN research-based practice project on knowledge and skin care practices. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2001;30:30-40.
16. Lund CH, Osborne JW, Kuller J, et al. Neonatal skin care: Clinical outcomes of the AWHONN/NANN evidence-based clinical practice guideline. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2001;30:41-51.
17. Manangan LP, Banerjee SN, Jarvis WR. Association between implementation of CDC recommendations and ventilator-associated pneumonia at selected US hospitals. Am J Infect Control. 2000;28:222-227.
18. Marshall JL, Mead P, Jones K, Kaba E, Roberts AP. The implementation of venous leg ulcer guidelines: Process analysis of the intervention used in a multi-centre, pragmatic, randomized, controlled trial. J Clin Nurs. 2001;10:758-766.
19. Oxman AD, Cook DJ, Guyatt GH. Users' guides to the medical literature VI. How to use an overview. JAMA. 1994;272:1367-1371.
20. Perlstein PH, Kotagal UR, Bolling C, et al. Evaluation of an evidence-based guideline for bronchiolitis. Pediatrics. 1999;104:1334-1341.
21. Perlstein PH, Kotagal UR, Schoettker PJ, et al. Sustaining the implementation of an evidence-based guideline for bronchiolitis. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000;154:1001-1007.
22. Perlstein PH, Lichtenstein P, Cohen MB, et al. Implementing an evidence-based acute gastroenteritis guideline at a children's hospital. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2002;28:20-30.
23. Sackett DL, Richardson WS, Rosenberg W, Haynes RB. Evidence-based medicine: How to practice & teach EBM. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1997.
24. SBU The Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care. Evidence based nursing caring for persons with schizophrenia. SBU/SSF-report No 4: Stockholm; 1999.
25. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. Levels of evidence and grades of recommendation. Edinburgh: SIGN, 2000. Available at: http://www.sign.ac.uk/pdf/sign50section6.pdf. Accessed: September 10, 2003.
26. Thomas L, Cullum N, McColl E, et al. Guidelines in professions allied to medicine (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 2. Oxford: Update Software; 2002.
27. Tranmer JE, Kisilevsky BS, Muir DW. A nursing research utilization strategy for staff nurses in the acute care setting. J Nurs Adm. 1995;25:21-29.
28. Willman A, Stoltz P. Evidensbaserad omvårdnad - en bro mellan forskning och klinisk verksamhet. [Evidence-based Nursing - a bridge between research and clinical practice] [in Swedish]. Lund: Studentlitteratur; 2002.