THE ENIGMATIC NO-PRETEXT CLAUSE: ARTICLE 60 OF THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS

Essays on the Law of Treaties: A Collection of Essays in Honour of Bert Vierdag

Volumn , Issue , 2023, Pages 41-57

  Alkema, Evert A ^a,b  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b Secretariat of the European Commission of Human Rights   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85204558461     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1163/9789004640931_008     Document Type: Chapter

References (24)

1. P. Sieghart, The International Law of Human Rights (1983), at 109.
2. E. Decaux, “Article 60", in L.-E. Pettiti et al. (eds.), La Convention Européenne des Droits de VHomme 897-903 (195), at 900.
3. S. Prêchai, Directives in European Community Law (1995).
4. M.J. Bossuyt, Guide to the ‘Travaux Préparatoires of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1987), at 109.
5. B. Graefrath, Menschenrechte und internationale Kooperation (1988), at 54.
6. M. Nowak, UN Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1993), at 100
7. H. Guradze, Die Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention (1968).
8. A. Frowein & W. Peukert, Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention (1985).
9. J. De Meyer, “Brèves réflexions à propos de l’Article 60 de CEDH”, in F. Matscher & H. Petzold (eds.), Protecting Human Rights: The European Dimension, Studies in Honour of Gerard J. Wiarda) 125-129 (1988).
10. L. Fisher, American Constitutional Law (1995), quoting from Prune Yard Shopping Center v. Robins, 447 US 74, 81 (1980).
11. G. Gunther, Constitutional Law (1991), at 44.
12. R. Ryssdal, “Address to the Conference of Presidents and Attorney Generals of the Supreme Courts of the European Community, Brussels 19-22 May 1992", Cour (92) 135, at 5.
13. R. Ryssdal, “Address to the Conference of Presidents and Attorney Generals of the Supreme Courts of the European Community, Brussels 19-22 May 1992", Cour (92) 135, at 42.
14. R. Ryssdal, “Address to the Conference of Presidents and Attorney Generals of the Supreme Courts of the European Community, Brussels 19-22 May 1992", Cour (92) 135, at 51.
15. E.A. Alkema, “Fundamental Human Rights and the Legal Order of the Netherlands”, in H.F. van Panhuys et al. (eds.), International Law in the Netherlands, Vol. 3, 109-146 (1980), esp. at 130.
16. A.Z. Drzemczewski, European Human Rights Convention in Domestic Law (1983).
17. M.C. Burkens, “The Complete Revision of the Dutch Constitution”, 29 Netherlands International Law Review (1982), at 331.
18. Ecourt HR, Judgment of 13 June 1979, A 31.
19. N. Valticos, “The international protection of economic and social rights”, in P. van Dijk et al., Recbten van de mens in mundiaal en Europees perspectief (1986).
20. E.A. Alkema, “The Third-Party Applicability or Drittwirkung’ of the European Convention on Human Rights”, in Matscher & Petzold, Recbten van de mens in mundiaal en Europees perspectief, at 33-45.
21. F. Matscher, “Methods of Interpretation of the Convention”, in R.St J. Macdonald et al. (eds.), The European System for the Protection of Human Rights 63-81 (1993).
22. Y. Dinstein, “The Erga Omnes Applicability of Human Rights”, 30 Archiv des Völkerrechts 16-21 (1992).
23. Th. Meron, “On a Hierarchy of International Human Rights”, 80 American Journal of International Law 1-23 (1986).
24. F. Matsche “Methods of Interpretation of the Convention”, in R.St J. Macdonald et al. (eds.), The European System for the Protection of Human Rights .