Property and The Human Rights Act 1998

Property and the Human Rights Act 1998

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 1-325

  Allen, Tom ^a  

^a DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85199830231     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (133)

1. MT ACEVEDO, ‘The Intersection of Human Rights and Environmental Protection in the European Court of Human Rights’ (2000) 8 New York University Environmental Law Journal 437.
2. B ACKERMAN, Private Property and the Constitution (Yale University Press, New Haven, 1977).
3. GH ALDRICH, ‘What Constitutes a Compensable Taking of Property? The Decisions of the Iran–United States Claim Tribunal’ (1994) 88 American Journal of International Law 585.
4. P ALLDRIDGE, Money Laundering Law (Hart Publishing, Oxford, 2003).
5. T ALLEN, The Right to Property in Commonwealth Constitutions (CUP, Cambridge, 2000).
6. ANON, ‘The Burmah Oil Affair’ (1966) 79 Harvard Law Review 614.
7. MR ANTINORI, ‘Does Lochner Live in Luxembourg?: An Analysis of the Property Rights Jurisprudence of the European Court of Justice’ (1995) 18 Fordham International Law Journal 1778.
8. S ARROWSMITH, Civil Liability and Public Authorities (Earlsgate Press, Winteringham, South Humberside, 1992).
9. N BAMFORTH, ‘The True “Horizontal Effect” of the Human Rights Act 1998’ (2001) 117 Law Quarterly Review 34.
10. P BENSON, ‘Equality of Opportunity and Private Law’ in D Friedmann and D Barak-Erez, (eds), Human Rights in Private Law (Hart Publishing, Oxford, 2001).
11. W BLACKSTONE, Commentaries on the Laws of England I (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1765; reprint: Dawsons of Pall Mall, London, 1966).
12. AM BICKEL, The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics (Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis, 1962).
13. D BEYLEVELD and S PATTINSON, ‘Horizontal Applicability and Horizontal Effect’ (2002) 118 Law Quarterly Review 623.
14. L BLUME and DL RUBINFELD, ‘Compensation for Takings: An Economic Analysis’ (1984) 72 California Law Review 569.
15. S BRIGHT, ‘Liability for the Bad Behaviour of Others’ (2001) 21 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 311.
16. S BRIGHT, ‘Ending Tenancies by Notice to Quit: The Human Rights Challenge’ (2004) 120 Law Quarterly Review 398.
17. R BROWNSWORD, ‘Freedom of Contract, Human Rights and Human Dignity’ in D Friedmann and D Barak-Erez, (eds), Human Rights in Private Law (Hart Publishing, Oxford, 2001).
18. M BRUNETTI, ‘The Iran–United States Claims Tribunal, NAFTA Chapter 11, and the Doctrine of Indirect Expropriation’ (2001) 2 Chicago Journal of International Law 203.
19. R BUXTON, ‘The Human Rights Act and Private Law’ (2000) 116 Law Quarterly Review 48.
20. AC CAIRNS, ‘The Judicial Committee and Its Critics’ (1971) 4 Canadian Journal of Political Science 301.
21. Committee on Transport, Local Government and the Regions, 6th Report (HC Paper (2002) No 240–I).
22. Compulsory Purchase Policy Review Advisory Group, Fundamental Review into the Laws and Procedures relating to Compulsory Purchase and Compensation (Transport and Regions Department of the Environment, London, 2000).
23. Council of Europe, Collected edition of the ‘Travaux Préparatoires’ of the European Convention on Human Rights: Recueil des Travaux Préparatoires de la Convention Européenne des Droits de l’Homme (M Nijhoff, The Hague 1975–85).
24. WR CORNISH and G DE N CLARK, Law and Society in England, 1750–1950 (Sweet & Maxwell, London, 1992).
25. S COYLE and K MORROW, The Philosophical Foundations of Environmental Law: Property, Rights and Nature (Hart Publishing, Oxford, 2004).
26. P CRAIG, Administrative Law, 4th edn (Sweet & Maxwell, London, 1999).
27. P CRAIG, ‘The Courts, the Human Rights Act and Judicial Review’ (2001) 117 Law Quarterly Review 589.
28. T DAINTITH, ‘The Constitutional Protection of Economic Rights’ (2004) 2 International Journal of Constitutional Law 56.
29. Department of Transport, Local Government and the Regions, Planning: Delivering Fundamental Change (Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, 2001) .
30. Department of Transport, Local Government and the Regions, Compulsory Purchase and Compensation: the Government’s Proposals for Change (Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, December 2001) .
31. R DESGAGNE, ‘Integrating Environmental Values into the European Convention on Human Rights’ (1995) 89 American Journal of International Law 263.
32. S DJAJIC, ‘The Right to Property and the Vasilescu v Romania Case’ (2000) 27 Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce 363.
33. R DOLZER, ‘Indirect Expropriations: New Developments?’ (2002) 11 New York University Environmental Law Journal 64.
34. E DREWNIAK, ‘Comment: The Bosphorus Case: The Balancing of Property Rights in the European Community and the Public Interest in Ending the War in Bosnia’ (1997) 20 Fordham International Law Journal 1007.
35. D ELVIN and J MAURICI, ‘The Alconbury Litigation: Principle and Pragmatism’ [2001] Journal of Planning & Environment Law 883.
36. RA EPSTEIN, Takings: Private Property and the Power of Eminent Domain (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1985).
37. HR FABRI, ‘The Approach Taken by the European Court of Human Rights to the Assessment of Compensation for “Regulatory Expropriations” of the Property of Foreign Investors’ (2002) 11 New York University Environmental Law Journal 148.
38. D FARRIER and P MCAUSLAN ‘Compensation, Participation and the Compulsory Acquisition of “Homes”’ in JF Garner, (ed), Compensation for Compulsory Purchase: A Comparative Study (The United Kingdom National Committee of Comparative Law, London, 1975).
39. MG FAURE, ‘Environmental Regulation’ in B Bouckaert and G De Geest (eds), Encylopedia of Law and Economics, ch 2300 (online at and ).
40. D FELDMAN, ‘Parliamentary Scrutiny of Legislation and Human Rights’ [2002] Public Law 323.
41. D FELDMAN, ‘Proportionality and the Human Rights Act 1998’ in E Ellis, (ed), The Principle of Proportionality in the Laws of Europe (Hart Publishing, Oxford, 1999).
42. D FELDMAN, ‘Human Dignity as a Legal Value: Part I’ [1999] Public Law 682.
43. W FISCHEL, Regulatory Takings: Law, Economics and Politics (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1995).
44. W FISCHEL, ‘Voting, Risk Aversion, and the NIMBY Syndrome: A Comment on Robert Nelson’s “Privatizing the Neighbourhood”’ [1999] 7 George Mason Law Review 881.
45. W FISCHEL, ‘Zoning and Land Use Regulation’ in B Bouckaert and G De Geest (eds), Encylopedia of Law and Economics, ch 2200 (online at and ).
46. JA FROWEIN, ‘The Protection of Property’ in R St J Macdonald, F Matscher and H Petzold, (eds), The European System for the Protection of Human Rights (M Nijhoff, Dordrecht, 1993).
47. R GIBBARD, ‘The Crichel Down Rules: Conduct or Misconduct in the Disposal of Public Lands’ in Elizabeth Cooke, (ed), Modern Studies in Property Law, Vol 2 (Hart Publishing, Oxford, 2003).
48. Gerald Eve Chartered Surveyors and the University of Reading, The Operation of the Crichel Down Rules (Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, London, 2000).
49. JW GOUGH, Fundamental Law in English Constitutional History (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1955).
50. M GRANT, ‘Human Rights and Due Process in Planning’ [2000] Journal of Planning & Environment Law 1215.
51. K GRAY, ‘Property in Thin Air’ (1991) 50 Cambridge Law Journal 252.
52. K GRAY, ‘Equitable Property’ (1994) 47 Current Legal Problems 157.
53. K GRAY, and SF GRAY, ‘Civil Rights, Civil Wrongs and Quasi-Public Space’ (1999) 1 European Human Rights Law Review 46.
54. K GRAY, and SF GRAY, ‘Private Property and Public Propriety’ in J McLean, (ed), Property and the Constitution (Hart Publishing, Oxford, 1999).
55. A GREAR, ‘A Tale of the Land, the Insider, the Outsider and Human Rights (an Exploration of some Problems and Possibilities in the Relationship between the English Common Law Property Concept, Human Rights Law, and Discourses of Exclusion and Inclusion)’ (2003) 23 Legal Studies 33.
56. MA HELDEWEG, RJGH SEERDEN and KR DEKETELAERE, ‘Public Environmental Law in Europe: a Comparative Search for a ius commune’ [2004] European Environmental Law Review 78.
57. G HEGEL, TM KNOX, (tr), Philosophy of Right (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1942).
58. Home Office, ‘Memorandum’, in Joint Committee on Human Rights, 11th Report, HL Paper (2002) No 75, HC Paper (2002) No 475, Appendices to the Minutes of Evidence.
59. Home Office, Guidance by the Secretary of State to the Director of the Assets Recovery Agency on How She should Exercise her Functions so as Best to Contribute to the Reduction of Crime, 20 January 2003.
60. D HOWARTH, ‘Nuisance and the House of Lords’ (2004) 16 Journal of Environmental Law 233.
61. W HOWARTH, ‘Environmental Human Rights and Democracy’ (2002) 14 Journal of Environmental Law 353.
62. J HOWELL, ‘Land and Human Rights’ [1999] Conv 287.
63. M HUNT, ‘The “Horizontal Effect” of the Human Rights Act’ [1998] Public Law 423.
64. WI JENNINGS, ‘Constitutional Interpretation: The Experience of Canada’ (1937) 51 Harvard Law Review 1.
65. Joint Committee on Human Rights, 3rd Report (HL Paper (2001) No 43, HC Paper (2001) No 405).
66. G KODILINYE, ‘The Statutory Authority Defence in Nuisance Actions’ (1990) 19 Anglo-American Law Review 72.
67. DP Kommers, The Constitutional Jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany, 1st edn (Duke University Press, Durham, NC, 1989).
68. RW KOSTAL, Law and English Railway Capitalism, 1825–1875 (OUP, Oxford, 1994).
69. C KRAUSE and G ALFREDSSON, ‘Article 17’ in G Alredsson and A Eide, (eds), The Universal Declaration of Human Rights: A Common Standard of Achievement (M Nijhoff, The Hague, 1999).
70. Law Commission of England and Wales, Towards a Compulsory Purchase Code: (1) Compensation (Law Com Consultation Paper No 165, 2002).
71. Law Commission of England and Wales, Towards a Compulsory Purchase Code: (1) Compensation (Law Com No 286, 2003).
72. A LESTER ‘UK Acceptance of the Strasbourg Jurisdiction: What Really Went on in Whitehall in 1965’ [1998] Public Law 237.
73. A LESTER, D PANNICK, ‘The Impact of the Human Rights Act on Private Law: The Knight’s Move’ (2000) 116 Law Quarterly Review 380.
74. KN LLEWELLYN, ‘Through Title to Contract and a Bit Beyond’ (1938) 15 New York University Law Quarterly Review 157.
75. I LOVELAND, ‘The Impact of the Human Rights Act on Security of Tenure in Public Housing’ [2004] Public Law 594.
76. I LOVELAND, ‘Making It Up as They Go Along? The Court of Appeal on Same Sex Spouses and Succession Rights to Tenancies’ [2003] Public Law 222.
77. P MACKLEM, ‘Rybná 9, Praha 1: Restitution and Memory in International Human Rights Law’ (Working Paper No 11, 2004, Center for Human Rights and Global Justice Working, Faculty of Law, New York University and Public Law Research Paper No 04–12, University of Toronto, 1 November 2004).
78. FA MANN, ‘Outlines of a History of Expropriation’ (1959) 75 Law Quarterly Review 188.
79. PJ MARSHALL, ‘Parliament and Property Rights in the Late Eighteenth-Century British Empire’ in J Brewer and S Staves, (eds), Early Modern Conceptions of Property (Routledge, London, 1995).
80. E MCWHINNEY, Judicial Review in the English-Speaking World, 2nd edn (University of Toronto Press, Toronto, 1960).
81. J MAURICI, “Gypsy Planning Challenges in the High Court” [2004] Journal of Planning Law 1654
82. M MENDELSON, ‘The United Kingdom Nationalization Cases and the European Convention on Human Rights’ (1986) 57 British Yearbook of International Law 33.
83. TJ MICELI and K SEGERSON, ‘Takings’ in B Bouckaert and G De Geest (eds), Encylopedia of Law and Economics (online at and ).
84. FI MICHELMAN, ‘Property, Utility, and Fairness: Comments on the Ethical Foundations of “Just Compensation” Law’ (1967) 80 Harvard Law Review 1165.
85. T MILLINGTON and MS WILLIAMS, The Proceeds of Crime: Law and Practice of Restraint, Confiscation and Forfeiture (OUP, Oxford, 2003).
86. H MOUNTFIELD, ‘The Concept of an Unlawful Interference with Fundamental Rights’ in J Jowell and J Cooper, (eds), Understanding Human Rights Principles (Hart Publishing, Oxford, 2001).
87. PT MUCHLINSKI, ‘Holding Multinationals to Account: Recent Developments in English Litigation and the Company Law Review’ (2002) 23 Company Lawyer 168.
88. B NEEDHAM, ‘The New Dutch Spatial Planning Act: Continuity and Change in the Way in which the Dutch Regulate the Practice of Spatial Planning’ (Working Paper Series 2004/12, Research Group Governance and Places, University of Nijmegen, Netherlands, November 2004).
89. D NICOL, ‘The Human Rights Act and the Politicians’ (2004) 24 Legal Studies 451.
90. D NICOL, ‘Are Convention Rights a No-Go Zone for Parliament?’ [2002] Public Law 438.
91. D NICOL, ‘Remedial and Substantive Horizontality: the Common Law and Douglas v Hello! Ltd’ [2002] Public Law 232.
92. Nolan Committee on Standards in Public Life, 3rd Report of the Nolan Committee on Standards in Public Life: Standards of Conduct in Local Government in England, Scotland and Wales (1997) (Cm 3702–1).
93. Lord Normand, ‘The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council––Retrospect and Prospect’ [1950] 3 Current Legal Problems 1.
94. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, Compulsory Purchase and the Crichel Down Rules, ODPM Circular 06/2004.
95. D OLIVER, ‘The Human Rights Act and Public Law/Private Law Divides’ [2000] European Human Rights Law Review 343.
96. A O’NEILL, ‘The Protection of Fundamental Rights in Scotland as a General Principle of Community Law––the Case of Booker Aquaculture’ (2000) 1 European Human Rights Law Review 18.
97. BH OXMAN and B RUDOLF, ‘Beyeler v Italy’ (2000) 94 American Journal of International Law 736.
98. W PEUKERT, ‘Protection of Ownership under Article of the First Protocol to the European Convention on Human Rights’ (1981) 2 Human Rights Law Journal 37.
99. G PHILLIPSON, ‘The Human Rights Act, “Horizontal Effect” and the Common Law: a Bang or a Whimper?’ (1999) 62 Modern Law Review 824.
100. M POUSTIE, ‘The Rule of Law or the Rule of Lawyers? Alconbury, Article 6(1) and the Role of Courts in Administrative Decision-Making’ (2001) 6 European Human Rights Law Review 657.
101. Press and Information Office of the Federal Government, Foreign Affairs Division (1994), Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany.
102. MJ RADIN, ‘Property and Personhood’ (1982) 34 Stanford Law Review 957.
103. MJ RADIN, ‘The Liberal Conception of Property: Cross Currents in the Jurisprudence of Takings’ (1988) 88 Columbia Law Review 1667.
104. M REDMAN, ‘Compulsory Purchase, Compensation and Human Rights’ [1999] Journal of Planning & Environment Law 315.
105. A REICHMAN, ‘Property Rights, Public Policy and the Limits of the Legal Power to Discriminate’ in D Friedmann and D Barak-Erez, (eds), Human Rights in Private Law (Hart Publishing, Oxford, 2001).
106. C ROSE, ‘Takings, Federalism and Norms’ (1996) 105 Yale Law Journal 1121.
107. J ROWAN–ROBINSON ‘Utility Wayleaves: Time for Reform’ [2001] Journal of Planning & Environment Law 1247.
108. GA RUBIN, Private Property, Government Requisition and the Constitution, 1914–1927 (Hambledon Press, London, 1994).
109. P SALES and B HOOPER, ‘Proportionality and the Form of Law’ (2003) 119 Law Quarterly Review 426.
110. RA SALGADO, ‘Protection of Nationals’ Rights to Property under the European Convention on Human Rights: Lithgow v United Kingdom’ (1987) 27 Virginia Journal of International Law 865.
111. J SAX, ‘Takings and the Police Power’ (1964) 74 Yale Law Journal 36.
112. HG SCHERMERS, ‘The International Protection of the Right of Property’ in F Matscher and H Petzold, (eds), Protecting Human Rights: The European Dimension (Carl Heymanns, Köln, 1988).
113. E SCHWELB, ‘The Protection of the Right to Property of Nationals under the First Protocol to the European Convention on Human Rights’ (1964) 13 American Journal of Comparative Law 518.
114. JM SELLERS, ‘Litigation as a Local Political Resource: Courts in Controversies over Land Use in France, Germany, and the United States’ (1995) 29 Law and Society Review 475.
115. WH SIMON, ‘Social–Republican Property’ (1991) 38 UCLA Law Review 1335.
116. AWB SIMPSON, Human Rights and the End of Empire: Britain and the Genesis of the European Convention (OUP, Oxford, 2001).
117. JW SINGER, ‘The Reliance Interest in Property’ (1988) 40 Stanford Law Review 614.
118. WB STOEBUCK, ‘A General Theory of Eminent Domain’ (1972) 47 Washington Law Review 553.
119. M STALLWORTHY, ‘Environmental Liability and the Impact of Statutory Authority’ (2003) 15 Journal of Environmental Law 3.
120. PG STILLMAN, ‘Hegel’s Analysis of Property in the Philosophy of Right’ (1989) 10 Cardozo Law Review 1030.
121. H STREET, Governmental Liability: A Comparative Study (CUP, Cambridge, 1953).
122. M TAGGART, ‘Expropriation, Public Purpose and the Constitution’ in C Forsyth and I Hare, (eds), The Golden Metwand and the Crooked Cord: Essays on Public Law in Honour of Sir William Wade QC (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1998).
123. P THOMAS, ‘The Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004: The Final Cut’ [2004] Journal of Planning & Environment Law 1348
124. LH TRIBE, American Constitutional Law, 2nd edn (Foundation Press, Mineola, NY, 1988).
125. LH TRIBE, American Constitutional Law, 3rd edn (Foundation Press, New York, 2000).
126. United Kingdom, Report of the Royal Commission on Churches (Scotland) (Cd 2494, 1905).
127. United Kingdom, Report of the Crowther Committee (Cmnd 4596, 1971).
128. United Kingdom, Reform of the Law on Consumer Credit (Cmnd 5427, 1973).
129. AJ VAN DER WALT, Constitutional Property Clauses: a Comparative Analysis (Juta, Cape Town, 1999).
130. HWR WADE, ‘Horizons of Horizontality’ (2000) 116 Law Quarterly Review 217.
131. J WALDRON, ‘Homelessness and the Issue of Freedom’ in J Waldron, Liberal Rights: Collected Papers, 1981–1991 (CUP, Cambridge, 1993).
132. H WECHSLER, ‘Toward Neutral Principles of Constitutional Law’ (1959) 73 Harvard Law Review 1.
133. LE WEINRIB and EJ WEINRIB, ‘Constitutional Values and Private Law in Canada’ in D Friedmann and D Barak-Erez, (eds), Human Rights in Private Law (Hart Publishing, Oxford, 2002).