Metaphor in Bob Dylan’s “Hurricane” Genre, language, and style

Linguistic Approaches to Literature

Volumn 1, Issue , 2002, Pages 183-209

  Steen, Gerard ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85199413427     PISSN: 15693112     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1075/lal.1.10ste     Document Type: Chapter

References (50)

1. Bhatia, V. K. 1993. Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. London and New York: Longman.
2. Biber, D., and Finegan, E. 1991. “On the exploitation of computerized corpora in variation studies”. In K. Aijmer and B. Altenberg (eds), English Corpus Linguistics, 204–220. London: Longman.
3. Brewer, W. F. and Lichtenstein, E. H. 1982. “Stories are to entertain: A structural-affect theory of stories”. Journal of Pragmatics 6: 473–486.
4. Cameron, L. 1999. “Identifying and describing metaphor in spoken discourse data.”. In L. Cameron and G. Low (eds.), Researching and Applying Metaphor, 105–132. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Crisp, P. 2002. “Metaphorical propositions — a rationale.” Language and Literature 11: 7–16.
6. Crisp, P., Heywood, J., and Steen, G. 2002. “Identification and analysis, classification and quantification.” Language and Literature 11: 55–69.
7. Emmott, C. 1997. Narrative Comprehension. Oxford: At the Clarendon Press.
8. Gavins, J., and Steen, G. (eds). In press. Cognitive Poetics in Practice. London: Routledge.
9. Gibbs, R. W. jr. 2002. “Stalking metaphors in the wild: Psycholinguistic comments on the metaphor identification project”. Language and Literature 11: 78–84.
10. Goatly, A. 1997. The Language of Metaphors. London: Routledge.
11. Graesser, A. and Kreuz, R. 1993. “A theory of inference generation during text comprehension”. Discourse Processes 16: 145–160.
12. Heywood, J., Semino, E., and Short, M. 2002. “Linguistic metaphor identification in two extracts from novels.” Language and Literature 11: 35–54.
13. Holt, E. and Drew, P. 2001. “Figurative expressions as topical pivots”. In J. Barnden, M. Lee, and K. Markert (eds.), Proceedings of the Workshop on Corpus-based and Processing Apporaches to Figurative Language — held in Conjunction with Corpus Linguistics 2001, 27–33. Lancaster: University Centre for Computer Corpus Research on Language.
14. Hymes, D. 1962. “The ethnography of speaking.” Reprinted in J. Fishman (Ed.), Readings on the Sociology of Language, 99–138. The Hague: Mouton.
15. Ibsch, E., Schram, D. and Steen, G. (eds). 1989. Empirical Studies of Literature. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
16. Janssen, S. and Van Dijk, N. (eds). 1998. The Empirical Study of Literature and the Media: Current approaches and perspectives. Rotterdam: Barjesteh and Co’s.
17. Kintsch, W. 1998. Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Kövecses, Z. 2002. “Cognitive-linguistic comments on the metaphor identification project.” Language and Literature 11: 74–78.
19. Kreuz, R.J. and MacNealy, M.S. (eds). 1996. Empirical Approaches to Literature and Aesthetics. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
20. Labov, W. 1972. Language in the Inner City. Oxford: Blackwell.
21. Lakoff, G. 1986. “The meanings of literal.” Metaphor And Symbolic Activity 1: 291–96.
22. Lakoff, G. 1993. “The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor.” Metaphor and Thought. In A. Ortony (ed.), 202–251. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (2nd ed.).
23. Lakoff, G., and Johnson, M.. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24. Leech, G. and Short, M. 1981. Style in Fiction. London: Longman.
25. Low, G., and Cameron, L. 2002. “Applied-linguistic comments on the metaphor identification project.” Language and Literature 11: 84–96.
26. Rusch, G. 1995. Empirical Approaches to Literature: Proceedings of the Fourth Biannual Conference of the International Society for the Empirical Study of Literature — IGEL, Budapest, August 1994. Siegen: Siegen University.
27. Schram, D.H., and Steen, G.J. (eds). 2001. The Psychology and Sociology of Literature. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
28. Schreier, M. 2001. “Qualitative methods in studying text reception.” In Schram and Steen (eds), 35–56.
29. Semino, E., Heywood, J., and Short, M. Submitted. “Methodological problems in the analysis of metaphors in a corpus of conversations about cancer.”
30. Semino, E., and Steen, G. 2001.” A method for annotating metaphors in corpora.” In J. Barnden, M. Lee, and K. Markert (eds), Proceedings of the Workshop on Corpus-based and Processing Apporaches to Figurative Language — Held in Conjunction with Corpus Linguistics 2001, 59–66. Lancaster: University Centre for Computer Corpus Research on Language.
31. Steen, G.J. 1994. Understanding Metaphor in Literature: An empirical approach. London: Longman.
32. Steen, G. J. 1999a. “Genres of discourse and the definition of literature”. Discourse Processes 28. 109–120.
33. Steen, G. J. 1999b. “Metaphor and discourse: Towards a linguistic checklist for metaphor analysis”. In L. Cameron and G. Low (eds), Researching and Applying Metaphor, 81–104. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34. Steen, G. J. 1999c. “From linguistic to conceptual metaphor in five steps.” In R. W. Gibbs, jr., and G. J. Steen (eds), Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics, 57–77. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
35. Steen, G. J. 1999d. “Analyzing metaphor in literature: With examples from William Wordsworth’s ‘I wandered Lonely as a Cloud’”. Poetics Today 20: 499–522.
36. Steen, G. J. 2001a. “A reliable procedure for metaphor identification.” In J. Barnden, M. Lee, and K. Markert (eds), Proceedings of the Workshop on Corpus-based and Processing Apporaches to Figurative Language — Held in Conjunction with Corpus Linguistics 2001, 67–75. Lancaster: University Centre for Computer Corpus Research on Language.
37. Steen, G.J. 2001b. “A rhetoric of metaphor: Conceptual and linguistic metaphor and the psychology of literature.” In Schram & Steen (eds), 145–163.
38. Steen, G. J. 2002a. “Towards a procedure for metaphor identification.” Language and Literature 11: 19–34.
39. Steen, G. J. 2002b. “Metaphor identification: A cognitive approach”. Style 36 (3): 386–401.
40. Steen, G. J. In press a. “Poetics and linguistics again: The role of genre.” To appear in S.Csabi and J. Zerkowitz (eds.), Textual Secrets: The message of the medium.
41. Steen, G.J. Submitted. “Structural metaphor properties and metaphor recognition.”
42. Steen, G.J., and Schram, D.H. 2001. “The empirical study of literature: Psychology, sociology, and other disciplines”. In Schram and Steen (eds), 1–16.
43. Stockwell, P. 2002. Cognitive Poetics: An Introduction. London: Routledge.
44. Swales, J.M. 1990. Genre Analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45. Tötösy de Zepetnek, S. and Sywenky, I. 1997. The Systemic and Empirical Approach to Literature and Culture as Theory and Application. Edmonton: University of Alberta.
46. Ungerer, F., and Schmid, H.-J. 1996. An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics. London: Longman.
47. Van den Broek, P. 1994. “Narrative comprehension and recall”. In M. A. Gernsbacher (ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics, 475–525. New York: Academic Press.
48. Van Dijk, T.A., and Kintsch, W. 1983. Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
49. Zwaan, R. A. 1993. Aspects of Literary Comprehension. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
50. Zwaan, R.A., Madden, C.J., and Stanfield, R.A., 2001. “Time in narrative comprehension: A cognitive perspective”. In Schram and Steen (eds.), 71–86.