Cognitive stylistics of humorous texts

Linguistic Approaches to Literature

Volumn 1, Issue , 2002, Pages 231-250

  Attardo, Salvatore ^a  

^a YOUNGSTOWN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85199342288     PISSN: 15693112     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1075/lal.1.12att     Document Type: Chapter

References (24)

1. Attardo, S. 1994. Linguistic Theories of Humor. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
2. Attardo, S. 1997. “The semantic foundations of cognitive theories of humor.” HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research 10 (4): 395–420.
3. Attardo, S. 1998. “The analysis of humorous narratives.” HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research 11 (3): 231–260.
4. Attardo, S. 2001a. Humorous Texts: A semantic and pragmatic analysis. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
5. Attardo, S. 2001b. “Stylistic markers of ‘serious relief’ in Wilde’s Lord Arthur Savile’s Crime.” Stylistika X: 19–31
6. Attardo, S., Attardo, D. H., Baltes, P. and Petray, M. J. 1994. “The linear organization of jokes: Statistical analysis of two thousand texts” HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research 7(1): 27–54.
7. Attardo, S and Raskin, V. 1991. “Script theory revis(it)ed: Joke similarity and joke representation model.” HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research 4 (3–4): 293–347.
8. Campbell, J. 1949. The Hero with a Thousand Faces. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (2nd. ed. 1968).
9. Chlopicki, W. 1987. “An application of the script theory of semantics to the analysis of selected Polish humorous short stories”. (M.A. thesis. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University).
10. Chlopicki, W. 1997. “An approach to the analysis of verbal humor in short stories.” HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research 10 (3): 333–347.
11. Chlopicki, W. 2001. “Humorous and non-humorous stories — Are there differences in frame-based reception?” Stylistika X: 59–78.
12. Culpeper, J. 2001. Language and Characterization. People in plays and other texts. London: Longman.
13. Eco, U. 1992. Interpretation and Overinterpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Fillmore, C. 1985. “Frames and the semantics of understanding. In V. Raskin (ed.), Roundtable on script/frame semantics.” Quaderni di Semantica 6(2): 222–254.
15. Minsky, M. 1981. “A framework for representing knowledge.” In J. Haugeland (ed.), Mind Design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Rpt. in Readings in Knowledge Representation, R. J. Brachman and H. J. Levesque (eds). Palo Alto, CA: Morgan Kaufmann. 1985: 246–262).
16. Palmer, J. 1987. The Logic of the Absurd. London: British Film Institute.
17. Peacham, H. 1639. “A merry discourse of Meum and Tuum.” In A. Locatelli. 1998. Il doppio e il picaresco:Un caso paradigmatico nel Rinascimento inglese. Milano: Jaca Book.
18. Propp, V.J. 1928. Morfologija Skazki. Leningrad: Akademia. Translated as “Morphology of the folktale”. In International Journal of American Linguistics. 24:4. 1958. (2nd ed. Austin: University of Texas Press. 1968).
19. Raskin, V. 1985. Semantic Mechanisms of Humor. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
20. Ruch, W., Attardo, S. and Raskin, V. 1993. “Towards an empirical verification of the General Theory of Verbal Humor.” HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research 6(2): 123–136.
21. Schank, R.C., and Abelson, R. 1977. Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding. New York: Wiley.
22. Semino, E. 1997. Language and World Creation in Poems and Other Texts. London: Longman.
23. Sexton, A. 1981. “Transformations.” In The Complete Poems. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
24. Wilde, O. 1909. Lord Arthur Savile’s Crime. (Text available from the internet, at various locations).