A cognitive stylistic approach to mind style in narrative fiction

Linguistic Approaches to Literature

Volumn 1, Issue , 2002, Pages 95-122

  Semino, Elena ^a  

^a LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85199315667     PISSN: 15693112     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1075/lal.1.07sem     Document Type: Chapter

References (43)

1. Bartlett, F. C. 1932. Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
2. Black, E. 1993. “Metaphor, simile and cognition in Golding’s The Inheritors.” Language and Literature 2: 37–48.
3. Bockting, I. 1994. Character and Personality in the Novels of William Faulkner: A study in psychostylistics. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam Press.
4. Conradi, P. 1982. John Fowles. London: Methuen.
5. Cook, G. 1994. Discourse and Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press
6. Culpeper, J. 2001. Language and Characterisation: People in plays and other texts. London: Longman.
7. De Bernières, L. 1999. Captain Corelli’s Mandolin. London: Vintage.
8. Eysenck, M. W. and Keane, M. T. 2000. Cognitive Psychology: A student’s handbook. London: Psychology Press. (4th ed.).
9. Fauconnier, G. 1997. Mappings in Thought and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Fauconnier, G. and Turner, M. 1996. “Blending as a central process of grammar.” In A. Goldberg (ed.), Conceptual Structure, Discourse, and Language, 113–130 Stanford, CA.: Center for the Study of Language and Information.
11. Fish, S. 1981. “What is stylistics and why are they saying such terrible things about it?” In D. Freeman (ed.), Essays in Modern Stylistics, 53–78. London: Methuen.
12. Fowler, R. 1977. Linguistics and the Novel. London: Methuen.
13. Fowler, R. 1986. Linguistic Criticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14. Fowler, R. 1996. Linguistic Criticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (2nd ed.).
15. Fowles, J. 1998. The Collector. London: Vintage.
16. Gibbs, R. W., Jr. 1994. The Poetics of Mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.
17. Goatly, A. 1997. The Language of Metaphors. London: Routledge.
18. Grady, J., Oakley, T. and Coulson, S. 1999. “Blending and metaphor.” In R. W. Gibbs, Jr. and G. J. Steen (eds.), Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics, 101–24. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
19. Halliday, M. A. K. 1971. “Linguistic function and literary style: an inquiry into the language of William Golding’s The Inheritors.” In Chatman, S. (ed.), Literary Style: A Symposium, 330–68. New York: Oxford University Press
20. Hoover, D.L. 1999. Language and Style in “The Inheritors”. Lanham: University Press of America.
21. Kövecses, Z. 2000. “The scope of metaphor”. In A. Barcelona (ed.), Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads: A cognitive perspective, 79–92. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
22. Lakoff, G. 1993. “The contemporary theory of metaphor.” In. A. Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and Thought, 202–51. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (2nd ed.).
23. Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
24. Lakoff, G. and Turner, M. 1989. More than Cool Reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
25. Leech, G. N. and Short, M. H. 1981. Style in Fiction. London: Longman.
26. Murphy, G. 1996. “On metaphoric representations.” Cognition 60: 173–204.
27. Olshen, B. N. 1978. John Fowles. New York: Frederick Ungar Publishing Co.
28. Ryan, M. L. 1991. Possible Worlds, Artificial Intelligence and Narrative Theory. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
29. Salami, M. 1992. John Fowles’s Fiction and the Poetics of Postmodernism. London: Associated University Presses.
30. Schank, R. C. 1982 Dynamic Memory: A theory of reminding and learning in computers and people. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. Schank, R. C. and Abelson, R. 1977 Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding. Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
32. Semino, E. 1995. “Schema Theory and the Analysis of Text Worlds in Poetry.” Language and Literature 4(2): 79–108.
33. Semino, E. 1997. Language and World Creation in Poems and Other Texts. London: Longman.
34. Semino, E., Heywood, J. and Short, M. Forthcoming. “Methodological problems in the analysis of metaphors in a corpus of conversations about cancer.” Journal of Pragmatics.
35. Semino, E. and Swindlehurst, K. 1996. “Metaphor and mind style in Ken Kesey’s One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest.” Style, 30, 1, 143–166.
36. Short, M. 1996. Exploring the Language of Poems, Plays and Prose. London: Longman.
37. Simpson, P. 1993. Language, Ideology and Point of View. London: Routledge.
38. Steen, G.J. 1999. “From linguistic to conceptual metaphor in five steps.” In R.W. Gibbs, Jr. and G.J. Steen (eds), Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics, 57–77. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
39. Toolan, M. 1990. The Stylistics of Fiction: A literary-linguistic approach. London: Routledge.
40. Tsapadikou, M. 2001. A Stylistic Analysis of John Fowles’s The Collector with a Particular Focus on Point of View and Mind Style. MA Dissertation, Lancaster University.
41. Turner, M. and Fauconnier, G. 1999. “A Mechanism of creativity.” Poetics Today. 20(3): 397–418.
42. Turner, M. and Fauconnier, G. 2000. “Metaphor, metonymy, and binding.” In A. Barcelona (ed.), Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads: A cognitive perspective, 133–45. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
43. Wolfe, P. 1976. John Fowles, Magus and Moralist. Lewisburg: Bucknell University Press.