Farm hygiene and teat cleaning requirements in automatic milking

Automatic milking, a better understanding

Volumn , Issue , 2023, Pages 83-93

  Knappstein, Karin ^a   Roth, Nele ^a   Slaghuis, Betsie ^b   Ferwerda Van Zonneveld, Reina ^b   Walte, Hans Georg ^a   Reichmuth, Joachim ^a  

^a Institute for Hygiene and Food Safety   (Germany)

^b WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85195761392     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (14)

1. Council Directive 89/362/EEC of 26 May 1989 on general conditions of hygiene in milk production holdings, Official Journal of the European Communities No. L156, 08.06.89, pp. 30-32.
2. Council Directive 92/46/EEC of 16 June 1992 laying down the health rules for the production and placing on the market of raw milk, heat treated milk and milk-based products, Official Journal of the European Communities No. L268, 14.09.1992, pp. 1-32.
3. Frank, J.F., L. Hankin, J.A. Koburger and E.H. Marth, 1985. Tests for groups of microorganisms. In: Richardson, G.H. (editor), Standard methods for the examination of dairy products, 15th edition, American Public Health Association, Washington D.C., pp 189-191.
4. Gaworski, M.A., C.B. Tucker, D.M. Weary and M.L. Swift, 2003. Effects of stall design on dairy cattle behaviour. Proceedings of the Fifth Dairy Housing Conference, 29-31 January 2003, Fort Worth, Texas, pp. 139-146.
5. International Dairy Federation, 1985. Milk and milk products, Enumeration of coliforms-Colony count technique and most probable number technique at 30 °C. IDF Standard 73A:1985.
6. International Dairy Federation, 1991. Milk and milk products, Enumeration of microorganisms-Colony count technique at 30 °C. IDF Standard 100B:1991.
7. Melin, M., H. Wiktorsson and A. Christiansson, 2002. Teat cleaning efficiency before milking in DeLaval VMS TM versus conventional manual cleaning, using Clostridium tyrobutyricum spores as marker. Proceedings of The First North American Conference on Robotic Milking, March 20-22, 2002, Toronto, Canada, II 60-63.
8. Reinemann, D., 1997. Troubleshooting high bacteria counts in farm milk. Proceedings 36th Annual Meeting, National Mastitis Council, Inc., Albuquerque, New Mexico, pp. 65-79. SAS Release 8.01. SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC, USA
9. Schreiner, D.A. and P.L. Ruegg, 2003. Relationship between udder and leg hygiene scores and subclinical mastitis. Journal of Dairy Science 86: 3460-3465.
10. Schuiling, E., 1992. Teat cleaning and stimulation. In: Ipema, A.H. (editor), Prospects for Automatic Milking. Pudoc, Wageningen, Netherlands, pp. 164-168.
11. Slaghuis, B., 1996. Sources and significance of contaminants on different levels of raw milk production. Proceedings of the IDF Symposium on Bacteriological Quality of Raw Milk. Wolfpassing, Austria, pp. 19-27.
12. Sumner, J., 1996. Farm production influences on milk hygiene quality. Proceedings of the IDF Symposium on Bacteriological Quality of Raw Milk. Wolfpassing, Austria, pp. 94-102.
13. Ten Hag, J. and K.E. Leslie, 2002. Preliminary investigation of teat cleaning procedures in a robotic milking system. Proceedings of The First North American Conference on Robotic Milking, March 20-22, 2002, Toronto, Canada, V 55-58.
14. Welham, S.J., 2002, In: Genstat Release 6.1. 2002. Lawes Agricultural Trust. IACR-Rothamsted, Harpenden, Hertfordshire, UK., pp. 226-228.