AN on-line somatic cell count sensor

Automatic milking, a better understanding

Volumn , Issue , 2023, Pages 235-240

  Whyte, D S ^a   Orchard, R G ^a   Cross, P S ^a   Frietsch, T ^a   Claycomb, R W ^a   Mein, G A ^a  

^a Sensortec Ltd   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85195736261     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (18)

1. Bottazzi, V., 1963. Contributo al metodi di riconoscimento del latte mastitico. Il Latte 37:755-759.
2. Carre, X., 1970. Effect of leucocytes on the viscosity of milk in the sodium lauryl sulphate test for mastitis. These 22, Ecole Nationale Veterinaire, De Lyon.
3. Christ Von W., 1962. Mit 3 Abbildungen über das Reaktionsvermögen von Proteinen mit synthetischen Netzmitteln als Grundlage zum Verständnis des California mastitis Tests. Deutsche tierärztliche Wochenschrift 4:108-110
4. Dounce and Monty, 1955. Factors affecting the gel-ability of isolated nuclei. Journal of Biophysical and Biochemical Cytology 1:155.
5. Jaartsveld, F.H.J., 1962. Contribution to diagnosis of mastitis in cattle in connection with the mastitis control. Netherlands Milk Dairy Journal 16:260-264.
6. Kiermeier, F., and K. Keis, 1964. Semi-quantitative modification of the Schalm test. Milchwissenschaft 19:65-69.
7. Milne, J.R., 1977. Observations of the Californian Mastitis Test (CMT) reaction. II. Photomicrographic studies of somatic cells and their reaction with surface active agents. New Zealand Journal Dairy Science. Technolnology 12:48-50.
8. Milne J.R. and De Langen H., 1977. Observations of the California mastitis test (CMT) reaction. I. The roles of Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and milk protein in the reaction. New Zealand Journal of Dairy Science and Technology 12:44-47.
9. Nageswararao, G., and H.E. Calbert, 1969. A comparison of screening test to detect abnormal milk. Journal of milk food technology 32:365-368.
10. Nichols, G.M., and D.S.M. Phillips, 1972. A rotary viscometer for leukocyte count determinations in milk. Australian Journal of Dairy Technology 27:134-136.
11. Schalm, O.W., and D.O. Noorlander, 1957. Experiments and observations leading to development of the California Mastitis Test. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 130:199-204.
12. Singh, B., and R.T. Marshall, 1966. Bacterial deoxyribonuclease production and its possible influence on mastitis detection. Journal of Dairy Science 49:822-825.
13. Thompson, D.I., and D.S. Postle, 1964. The Wisconsin Mastitis Test-an indirect estimation of leucocytes in milk. Journal of Milk Food Technology 27:271-275.
14. Tiu, C. and Boger, D., 1983. Rheology and Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics, June pg 24.
15. Whittlestone, W.G., and D.J. Allen, 1966. An automatic viscometer for the measurement of the California Mastitis Reaction. Australian Journal of Dairy Technology 21:136-139.
16. Whittlestone, W.G., L.R. Fell and H. de Langen, 1970. A viscometric method for the estimation of milk cell count. Journal of Milk Food Technology 33:351-354.
17. Whittlestone, W.G., H. de Langen and L. Cate, 1972. A simple semi-automatic viscometer for the estimation for somatic cells in milk. Milchwissenschaft 27:84-86.
18. Whiteside, W.H., 1939. Observation on a new test for the presence of mastitis in milk Canadian Public Health Journal 30:44.