Rediscovering the Law of Negligence

Rediscovering the Law of Negligence

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 1-530

  Beever, Allan ^a  

^a AUCKLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85195734687     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (260)

1. ALLISON, HE, Kant’s Theory of Freedom (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990).
2. American Law Institute, Restatement of the Law of Torts (American Law Institute Publishers, St Paul, Minn, 1934).
3. AQUINAS, T, Summa theologica (trans English Dominicans, Benziger Bros, New York, 1947).
4. ARISTOTLE, Nicomachean Ethics (trans T Irwin, Hackett, Indianapolis, Ind, 1999).
5. ASHWORTH, A, Principles of Criminal Law, 4th edn (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2003).
6. ATIYAH, PS, The Rise and Fall of Freedom of Contract (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1979).
7. ATIYAH, PS, ‘Personal Injuries in the Twenty-First Century: Thinking the Unthinkable’ in P Birks (ed), Wrongs and Remedies in the Twenty-First Century (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1996).
8. ATIYAH, PS, Accidents, Compensation and the Law, 6th edn (Butterworths, London, 1999).
9. ATKIN, Lord, ‘Law as an Educational Subject’ [1932] Journal of the Society of Public Teachers of Law 27.
10. BARKER, K, ‘Unreliable Assumptions in the Modern Law of Negligence’ (1993) 109 LQR 461.
11. BEEVER, A, ‘Cause-In-Fact: Two Steps Out of the Mire’ (2001) 51 University of Toronto Law Journal 327.
12. BEEVER, A, ‘The Structure of Aggravated and Exemplary Damages’ (2003) 23 OJLS 87.
13. BEEVER, A, ‘The Law’s Function and the Judicial Function’ (2003) 20 New Zealand Universities Law Review 299.
14. BEEVER, A, ‘All at Sea in the Law of Negligent Misrepresentation’ (2003) 9 New Zealand Business Law Quarterly 101.
15. BEEVER, A, ‘Particularism and Prejudice in the Law of Tort’ (2003) 11 Tort Law Review 146.
16. BEEVER, A, ‘Perspectives of Responsibility in Law and Morality’ (2003) 27 Melbourne University Law Review 905.
17. BEEVER, A, ‘Aristotle on Justice, Equity, and Law’ (2004) 10 Legal Theory 33.
18. BEEVER, A, ‘A Rights-Based Approach to the Recovery of Economic Loss in Negligence’ (2004) 4 OUCLJ 25.
19. BEEVER, A, ‘Lord Hoffmann’s Mouse’ (2004) 10 New Zealand Business Law Quarterly 161.
20. BEEVER, A, ‘Justice and Punishment in Tort: A Comparative Theoretical Analysis’ in R Grantham and C Rickett (eds), Justifying Remedies in Private Law (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, forthcoming 2007).
21. BEEVER, A, and Rickett, C, ‘Interpretive Legal Theory and the Academic Lawyer’ (2005) 68 MLR 320.
22. BENDER, L, ‘A Lawyer’s Primer on Feminist Theory and Tort’ (1988) 38 Journal of Legal Education 3.
23. BENSON, P, ‘The Basis for Excluding Liability for Economic Loss in Tort Law’ in D Owen (ed), Philosophical Foundations of Tort Law (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1995).
24. BENSON, P, ‘The Idea of a Public Basis of Justification for Contract’ (1995) 33 Osgoode Hall Law Journal 273.
25. BENSON, P, ‘The Unity of Contract Law’ in P Benson (ed), The Theory of Contract Law: New Essays (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001).
26. BENSON, P, ‘Equality of Opportunity and Private Law’ in D Friedmann and D Barak-Erez (eds), Human Rights in Private Law (Hart Publishing, Oxford, 2001).
27. BENSON, P, ‘Philosophy of Property Law’ in J Coleman and S Shapiro (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002).
28. BENSON, P, ‘Should White v. Jones Represent Canadian Law: A Return to First Principles’ in JW Neyers, E Chamberlain and SGA Pitel (eds), Emerging Issues in Tort Law (Hart Publishing, Oxford, forthcoming 2007).
29. BENTHAM, J, The Principles of Morals and Legislation (Prometheus Books, Amherst, NY, 1988).
30. BENTHAM, J, Introduction to the Law of Restitution, 2nd edn (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1989).
31. BENTHAM, J, ‘The Concept of a Civil Wrong’ in D Owen (ed), Philosophical Foundations of Tort Law (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1995).
32. BENTHAM, J, Harassment and Hubris: The Right to an Equality of Respect (University College Dublin Faculty of Law, Dublin, 1996).
33. BENTHAM, J, ‘Definition and Division: A Meditation on Institutes 3.13’ in P Birks (ed), The Classification of Obligations (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1997).
34. BENTHAM, J, ‘More Logic and Less Experience: The Difference between Scots Law and English Law’ in D Carey Miller and R Zimmermann (eds), The Civilian Tradition and Scots Law (Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, 1997).
35. BENTHAM, J, Unjust Enrichment (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 2003).
36. BISHOP, W, ‘Negligent Misrepresentation Through Economists’ Eyes’ (1980) 96 LQR 360.
37. BLOM, J, ‘The Evolving Relationship Between Tort and Contract’ (1985) 10 Canadian Business Law Journal 257.
38. BOHLEN, FH, ‘The Moral Duty to Aid Others as a Basis of Tort Liability’ (1908) 56 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 217.
39. BOHLEN, FH, ‘Contributory Negligence’ (1908) 21 Harvard Law Review 233.
40. BOHLEN, FH, Studies in the Law of Torts(Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis, Ind, 1926).
41. BRIDGE, MG, ‘Mitigation of Damages in Contract and the Meaning of Avoidable Loss’ (1989) 105 LQR 398.
42. BROWN, R, ‘Still Crazy After All These Years: Anns, Cooper v. Hobart and Pure Economic Loss’ (2003) 36 University of British Columbia Law Review 159.
43. BROWN, R, ‘Justifying the Impossibility of Recoverable Relational Economic Loss’ (2004) 5 OUCLJ 155.
44. BYRD, SB, and HRUSCHKA, J, ‘Duty to Recognize Private Property Ownership: Kant’s Theory of Property in his Doctrine of Right’ (2006) 56 University of Toronto Law Journal 217.
45. BYRD, SB, and HRUSCHKA, J, ‘Kant on “Why Must I Keep my Promise?”’ (2006) 81 Chicago-Kent Law Review 47.
46. CANE, P, Tort Law and Economic Interests, 2nd edn (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1996).
47. CANE, P, ‘Corrective Justice and Correlativity in Private Law’, (1996) 16 OJLS 471.
48. CANE, P, ‘Retribution, Proportionality, and Moral Luck in Tort Law’ in P Cane and J Stapleton (eds), The Law of Obligations: Essays in Celebration of John Fleming (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1998).
49. CANE, P, ‘Distributive Justice and Tort Law’ [2001] New Zealand Law Review 401.
50. CANE, P, Responsibility in Law and Morality (Hart Publishing, Oxford, 2002).
51. CANE, P, ‘Tort Law as Regulation’ (2002) 31 Common Law World Review 305.
52. CANE, P, ‘Reforming Tort Law in Australia: A Personal Perspective’ (2003) 27 Melbourne University Law Review 649.
53. CARRIGAN, F, ‘A Blast from the Past: The Resurgence of Legal Formalism’ (2003) 27 Melbourne University Law Review 163.
54. CHRISTIE, GC, ‘The Uneasy Place of Principle in Tort Law’ in D Owen (ed), Philosophical Foundations of Tort Law (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1995).
55. COASE, R, ‘The Problem of Social Cost’ (1960) 1 Journal of Law and Economics 1.
56. COLEMAN, J, The Practice of Principle (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2001).
57. COLLINS, H, Regulating Contracts (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1999).
58. COOKE, R, Turning Points of the Common Law (Sweet & Maxwell, London, 1997).
59. COOKE, LORD, OF THORNDON, ‘The Right of Spring’ in P Cane and J Stapleton (eds), The Law of Obligations: Essays in Celebration of John Fleming (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1998).
60. COOTE, B, ‘The Effect of Hedley Byrne’ (1966–1967) 2 New Zealand Universities Law Review 263.
61. COOTE, B, ‘Assumption of Responsibility and Pure Economic Loss in New Zealand’ [2005] New Zealand Law Review 1.
62. DWORKIN, R, Taking Rights Seriously (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass, 1977).
63. ENGLARD, I, The Philosophy of Tort Law (Dartmouth, Aldershot, 1993).
64. EPSTEIN, RA, ‘A Theory of Strict Liability’ (1973) 2 The Journal of Legal Studies 151.
65. EVANS, J, ‘Choice and Responsibility’ (2002) 27 Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy 97.
66. FELDTHUSEN, B, Economic Negligence, 4th edn (Carswell, Scarborough, 2000).
67. FINNIS, J, Natural Law and Natural Rights (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1980).
68. FISCHER, DA, ‘Causation in Fact in Omission Cases’ [1992] Utah Law Review 1335.
69. FLANNIGAN, R, ‘Privity—The End of an Era (Error)’ (1987) 103 LQR 564.
70. FLEISCHACKER, S, A Short History of Distributive Justice (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass, 2004).
71. FLEMING, J, ‘Remoteness and Duty: The Control Devices in Liability for Negligence’ (1953) Canadian Bar Review 471.
72. FLEMING, J, ‘Probabilistic Causation in Tort Law’ (1989) 68 Canadian Bar Review 661.
73. FLEMING, J, ‘Probabilistic Causation in Tort Law: A Postscript’ (1991) 70 Canadian Bar Review 136.
74. FLEMING, J, The Law of Torts, 9th edn (LBC Information Services, Sydney, 1998).
75. FLETCHER, G, ‘The Fault of not Knowing’ (2002) 3 Theoretical Inquiries in Law 265.
76. FRIEDMANN, D, and BARAKEREZ, D (eds), Human Rights in Private Law (Hart Publishing, Oxford, 2001)
77. FUMERTON, R, and KRESS, K, ‘Causation and the Law: Preemption, Lawful Sufficiency, and Causal Sufficiency’ (2001) 64(4) Law and Contemporary Problems 83.
78. GARDNER, J, ‘The Purity and Priority of Private Law’ (1996) 46 University of Toronto Law Journal 459.
79. GARNER, BA, A Dictionary of Modern Legal Usage (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1995).
80. GARNER, BA, Black’s Law Dictionary, 7th edn (West Group, St Paul, Minn, 1999).
81. GILMORE, G, The Death of Contract (Ohio State University Press, Columbus, Ohio, 1974).
82. GOLDBERG, JCP, and ZIPURSKY, BC, ‘Unrealized Torts’ (2002) 88 Virginia Law Review 1625.
83. GOLDBERG, R, Causation and Risk in the Law of Torts: Scientific Evidence and Medicinal Product Liability (Hart Publishing, Oxford, 1999).
84. GOLDER, B, ‘From McFarlane to Melchior and Beyond: Love, Sex, Money and Commodification in the Anglo-Australian Law of Torts’ (2004) 12 Torts Law Journal 128.
85. GOODHART, AL, ‘Rescue and Voluntary Assumption of Risk’ (1933–1935) 5 CLJ192.
86. GRANTHAM, R, and RICKETT, C, ‘Directors’ “Tortious” Liability: Contract, Tort or Company Law?’ (1999) 62 MLR 133.
87. GRANTHAM, R, and RICKETT, C, Enrichment and Restitution in New Zealand (Hart Publishing, Oxford, 2000).
88. GRANTHAM, R, and RICKETT, C, ‘Property Rights as a Legally Significant Event’ (2003) 62 CLJ 717.
89. GRASSIAN, V, Moral Reasoning: Ethical Theory and some Contemporary Moral Problems (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1981).
90. GROTIUS, H, The Law of War and Peace (trans FW Kelsey, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1925).
91. HAACK, S, ‘Truth and Justice, Inquiry and Advocacy, Science and Law’ (2004) 17 Ratio Juris 15.
92. HART, HLA, and HONORÉ, T, Causation in the Law, 2nd edn (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1985).
93. HEDLEY, S, ‘The Empire Strikes Back? A Restatement of the Law of Unjust Enrichment’ (2004) 28 Melbourne University Law Review 759.
94. HEPPLE, B, ‘Negligence: The Search for Coherence’ (1997) 50 CLP 69.
95. HEUSTON, RFV, ‘Donoghue v. Stevenson in Retrospect’ (1957) 20 MLR 1.
96. HEYDON, JD, ‘Judicial Activism and the Death of the Rule of Law’ (2003) 23 Australian Bar Review 110.
97. HOBBES, T, Leviathan (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1996).
98. HOLMES, OW, The Common Law (Dover Publications, New York, 1881).
99. HONORÉ, T, ‘Are Omissions Less Culpable?’ in P Cane and J Stapleton (eds), Essays for Patrick Atiyah (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1991).
100. HONORÉ, T, ‘Necessary and Sufficient Conditions in Tort Law’ in D Owen (ed), Philosophical Foundations of Tort Law (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1995).
101. HONORÉ, T, Responsibility and Fault (Hart Publishing, Oxford, 1999).
102. HOPE, LORD, ‘James McGhee—A Second Mrs. Donoghue?’ (2003) 62 CLJ 587.
103. HURD, HM, and MOORE, MS, ‘Negligence in the Air’ (2002) 3 Theoretical Inquiries in Law 333.
104. IBBETSON, DJ, A Historical Introduction to the Law of Obligations (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1999).
105. IBBETSON, DJ, ‘How the Romans did for Us: Ancient Roots of the Tort of Negligence’ (2003) 26 University of New South Wales Law Journal 475.
106. JAFFEY, AJE, The Duty of Care (Dartmouth, Aldershot, 1992).
107. JANSEN, N, ‘Duties and Rights in Negligence: A Comparative and Historical Perspective on the European Law of Extracontractual Liability’ (2004) 24 OJLS 443.
108. JENSEN, D, ‘Punitive Damages for Breach of Fiduciary Obligation’ (1996) 19 University of Queensland Law Journal 125.
109. JONES, M, ‘Liability for Psychiatric Damage: Searching for a Path between Pragmatism and Principle’ in JW Neyers, E Chamberlain and SGA Pitel (eds), Emerging Issues in Tort Law (Hart Publishing, Oxford, forthcoming 2007).
110. KANT, I, Critique of Pure Reason (trans NK Smith, St Martin’s Press, New York, 1965).
111. KANT, I, ‘The Metaphysics of Morals’ in M Gregor (ed), Practical Philosophy (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996).
112. KANT, I, ‘Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals’ in M Gregor (ed), Practical Philosophy (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996).
113. KANT, I, ‘Critique of Practical Reason’ in M Gregor (ed), Practical Philosophy (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996).
114. KANT, I, Critique of Pure Reason (trans P Guyer and A Wood, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998).
115. KANT, I, Critique of the Power of Judgment (trans P Guyer and E Matthews, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000).
116. KAPLOW, L, and SHAVELL, S, ‘Fairness Verses Welfare’ (2001) 114 Harvard Law Review 961.
117. KEATING, GC, ‘The Idea of Fairness in the Law of Enterprise Liability’ (1997) 95 Michigan Law Review 1266.
118. KELLY, JM, ‘The Inner Nature of the Tort Action’ (1967) 2 Irish Jurist (NS) 279.
119. KRIPKE, SA, Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language: An Elementary Exposition (Blackwell, Oxford, 1982).
120. Law Commission for England and Wales, ‘Contracts for the Benefit of Third Parties’, 1996 242
121. LEVIN, A, ‘Quantum Physics in Private Law’ (2001) 14 Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 249.
122. LINDEN, AM, Canadian Tort Law (7th edn, Butterworths, Markham, 2001).
123. LLOYD, D, ‘Note’ (1951) 14 MLR 499.
124. LOKE, AF, ‘Damages to Protect Performance Interest and the Reasonableness Requirement’ [2001] Singapore Journal of Legal Studies 259.
125. LUNTZ, H, and HAMBLY, D, Torts: Cases and Commentary (4th edn, Butterworths, Sydney, 1995).
126. MACCORMICK, N, Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1978).
127. MARKESINIS, B, ‘An Expanding Tort Law—The Price of a Rigid Contract Law’ (1987) 103 LQR 354.
128. MARKESINIS, BS, and UNBERATH, H, The German Law of Torts: A Comparative Treatise, 4th edn (Hart Publishing, Oxford, 2002).
129. MCBRIDE, NJ, ‘Duties of Care—Do they Really Exist?’ (2004) 24 OJLS 417.
130. MCBRIDE, NJ, and Bagshaw, R, Tort Law, 2nd edn (Pearson Education Ltd, Harlow, 2005).
131. MCINNES, M, ‘Causation in Tort Law: Back to Basics at the Supreme Court of Canada’ (1997) 35 Alberta Law Review 1013.
132. MEGARRY, RE, Miscellany-at-Law: A Diversion for Lawyers and Others (Stevens & Sons Ltd, London, 1955).
133. MILL, JS, ‘On Liberty’ in JS Mill, Three Essays (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1975).
134. MILL, JS, Utilitarianism (Hackett, Indianapolis, Ind, 1979).
135. MILSOM, SFC, Historical Foundations of the Common Law (Butterworths, London, 1981).
136. MORAN, M, Rethinking the Reasonable Person: An Egalitarian Reconstruction of the Objective Standard (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2003).
137. MORGAN, J, ‘Tort, Insurance and Incoherence’ (2004) 67 MLR 384.
138. MORGAN, J, ‘Lost Causes in the House of Lords: Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services’ [2003] 66 MLR 277.
139. MULGAN, T, ‘The Place of the Dead in Liberal Political Philosophy’ (1999) 7 Journal of Political Philosophy 52.
140. MULLANY, N, and HANDFORD, P, Tort Liability for Psychiatric Damage: The Law of ‘Nervous Shock’ (Sweet & Maxwell, London, 1993).
141. MULLENDER, R, ‘Corrective Justice, Distributive Justice, and the Law of Negligence’ (2001) 17 Professional Negligence 35.
142. NAGEL, T, ‘Death’ (1970) 4 Nous 73.
143. NEYERS, JW, ‘Donoghue v. Stevenson and the Rescue Doctrine: A Public Justification of Recovery in Situations Involving the Negligent Supply of Dangerous Structures’ (1999) 49 University of Toronto Law Journal 475.
144. NEYERS, JW, ‘Distilling Duty: The Supreme Court of Canada Amends Anns’ (2002) 118 LQR 221.
145. NOZICK, R, Anarchy, State, and Utopia (Blackwell, Oxford, 1975).
146. OAKESHOTT, M, ‘The Concept of a Philosophical Jurisprudence: Part I’ [1938] Politica 203.
147. OAKESHOTT, M, ‘The Concept of a Philosophical Jurisprudence: Part II’ [1938] Politica 345.
148. PEDAIN, A, ‘Unconventional Justice in the House of Lords’ [2004] CLJ 19.
149. PENNER, JE, The Idea of Property in Law (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1997).
150. PERRY, SR, ‘The Moral Foundations of Tort Law’ (1992) 77 Iowa Law Review 499.
151. PERRY, SR, ‘Tort Law’ in D Patterson (ed), A Companion to Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory (Blackwell, Cambridge Mass, 1996).
152. PERRY, SR, ‘On the Relationship Between Corrective and Distributive Justice: Fourth Series’ in J Horder (ed), Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000).
153. PERRY, SR, ‘Responsibility for Outcomes, Risk, and the Law of Torts’ in GJ Postema (ed), Philosophy and the Law of Torts (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001).
154. POLLOCK, F, The Law of Torts, 13th edn (Stevens, London, 1929).
155. PORAT, A, and STEIN, A, Tort Liability Under Uncertainty (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2001).
156. PORAT, A, and STEIN, A, ‘Indeterminate Causation and Apportionment of Damages: An Essay on Holtby, Allen, and Fairchild’ (2003) 23 OJLS 667.
157. POSNER, RA, Economic Analysis of Law, 2nd edn (Little, Brown and Co, Boston, Mass, 1977).
158. POSNER, RA, Cardozo: a Study in Reputation (Chicago University Press, Chicago, Ill, 1990).
159. PROSSER, WL, ‘Palsgraf Revisited’ (1953) 52 Michigan Law Review 1.
160. PROSSER, WL, et al, Prosser and Keeton on the Law of Torts, 5th edn (West Group, St Paul, Minn, 1894).
161. PUFENDORF, S, Of the Law of Nature and Nations (trans HC and WA Oldfather, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1934).
162. RACHELS, J, The Elements of Moral Philosophy, 3rd edn (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1999).
163. RAWLS, J, The Law of Peoples (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass, 1999).
164. RAWLS, J, A Theory of Justice: Revised Edition (Belknap, Cambridge, Mass, 1999).
165. RAWLS, J, ‘Outline of a Decision Procedure for Ethics’ in S Freeman (ed), John Rawls: Collected Papers (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass, 1999).
166. RAWLS, J, ‘The Independence of Moral Theory’ in S Freeman (ed), John Rawls: Collected Papers (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass, 1999).
167. RAZ, J, Practical Reason and Norms, 2nd edn (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1999).
168. REECE, H, ‘Losses of Chances in the Law’ (1996) 59 MLR 188.
169. RICKETT, C, ‘Extending Equity’s Reach through the Mutual Wills Doctrine?’ (1991) 54 MLR 581.
170. RIPSTEIN, A, Equality, Responsibility, and the Law (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999).
171. RIPSTEIN, A, ‘Three Duties to Rescue: Moral, Civil, and Criminal’ (2000) 19 Law and Philosophy 751.
172. RIPSTEIN, A, ‘Authority and Coercion’ (2004) 32 Philosophy and Public Affairs 2.
173. RIPSTEIN, A, and Zipursky, BC, ‘Corrective Justice in an Age of Mass Torts’ in GJ Postema (ed), Philosophy and the Law of Torts (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001).
174. ROBERTSON, B, ‘The Court System Through the Eyes of the Citizenry’ [2002] New Zealand Law Journal 267.
175. ROBINSON, OF, FERGUS, TD, and GORDON, WM, European Legal History, 2nd edn (Butterworths, London, 1994).
176. ROGERS, WVH, Winfield and Jolowicz on Tort, 16th edn (Sweet & Maxwell, London, 2002).
177. SALMOND, J, Torts, 7th edn (Sweet & Maxwell, London, 1929).
178. SCHROEDER, CH, ‘Corrective Justice, Liability for Risks, and Tort Law’ (1990) 38 University of California of Los Angeles Law Review 143.
179. SEAVEY, WS, ‘Mr. Justice Cardozo and the Law of Torts’ (1939) 39 Columbia Law Review 20.
180. SIMESTER, AP, and Chan, W, ‘Inducing Breach of Contract: One Tort or Two?’ [2004] CLJ 132.
181. SMART, JJC, ‘An Outline of a System of Utilitarian Ethics’ in JJC Smart and B Williams (eds), Utilitarianism: For and Against (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1973).
182. SMILLIE, J, ‘Let’s Abolish Negligence: Commentary on a Paper by J G Fogarty QC’, 1996 New Zealand Law Conference Papers (New Zealand Law Society, Dunedin 1996).
183. SMILLIE, J, Formalism, Fairness and Efficiency: Civil Adjudication in New Zealand’ [1996] New Zealand Law Review 254.
184. SMILLIE, J, Certainty and Civil Obligation’ (2000) 9 Otago Law Review 633.
185. SMILLIE, J, Is Security of Contract Worth Pursuing?—Reflections on the Function of Contract Law’ (2000) 16 Journal of Contract Law 148.
186. SMITH, JC, and BURNS, P, ‘Donoghue v. Stevenson—The Not So Golden Anniversary’ (1983) 46 MLR 147.
187. SMITH, L, ‘Restitution: The Heart of Corrective Justice’ (2001) 79 Texas Law Review 2115.
188. SMITH, SA, Contract Theory (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 2004).
189. SMITS, JM, The Good Samaritan in European Private Law: On the Perils of Principles without a Programme and a Programme for the Future (Kluwer, Deventer, 2000).
190. STAPLETON, J, ‘In Restraint of Tort’ in P Birks (ed), The Frontiers of Liability (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1994).
191. STAPLETON, J, ‘Torts, Insurance, and Ideology’ (1995) 58 MLR 820.
192. STAPLETON, J, ‘Duty of Care Factors: A Selection from the Judicial Menus’ in P Cane and J Stapleton (eds), The Law of Obligations: Essays in Celebration of John Fleming (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1998).
193. STAPLETON, J, ‘Perspectives on Causation’ in J Horder (ed), Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000).
194. STAPLETON, J, ‘Legal Cause: Cause-in-Fact and the Scope of Liability for Consequences’ (2001) 54 Vanderbilt Law Review 941.
195. STAPLETON, J, ‘Lords A’Leaping Evidentiary Gaps’ (2002) 10 Torts Law Journal 276.
196. STAPLETON, J, ‘Comparative Economic Loss: Lessons from Case-Law-Focused “Middle Theory” ’ (2002) 50 University of California of Los Angeles Law Review 531.
197. STAPLETON, J, ‘The Golden Thread at the Heart of Tort Law: Protection of the Vulnerable’ (2003) 24 Australian Bar Review 135.
198. STAUCH, M, ‘Causation, Risk, and Loss of Chance in Medical Negligence’ (1997) 17 OJLS 205.
199. STAUCH, M, ‘Risk and Remoteness of Damage in Negligence’ (2001) 64 MLR 191.
200. STEVENS, D, and NEYERS, JW, ‘What’s Wrong with Restitution?’ (1999) 37 Alberta Law Review 221.
201. STEYN, LORD, ‘Perspectives of Corrective and Distributive Justice in Tort Law’ (2002) 37 Irish Jurist 1.
202. STONE, M, ‘The Significance of Doing and Suffering’ in GJ Postema (ed), Philosophy and the Law of Torts (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001).
203. TAYLOR, J, ‘The Conceptual Basis of the Tort of Negligent Misstatement’ (2003) 9 New Zealand Business Law Quarterly 177.
204. TAYLOR, R, ‘A Comparative Study of Expert Testimony in France and The United States’ (1996) 31 Texas International Law Journal 181.
205. TETTENBORN, A, ‘Property Damage and Economic Loss: Should Claims by Property Owners Themselves be Limited?’ (2005) 34 Common Law World Review 128.
206. TODD, S, ‘Negligence: Particular Categories of Duty’ in S Todd (ed), The Law of Torts in New Zealand, 3rd edn (Brookers, Wellington, 2001).
207. TODD, S, ‘Negligence: Breach of Duty’ in S Todd (ed), The Law of Torts in New Zealand, 3rd edn (Brookers, Wellington, 2001).
208. TODD, S, ‘Defences’ in S Todd (ed), The Law of Torts in New Zealand, 3rd edn (Brookers, Wellington, 2001).
209. TODD, S, ‘Negligence: The Duty of Care’ in S Todd (ed), The Law of Torts in New Zealand, 3rd edn (Brookers, Wellington, 2001).
210. TODD, S, ‘Causation and Remoteness of Damage’ in S Todd (ed), The Law of Torts in New Zealand, 3rd edn (Brookers, Wellington, 2001).
211. TODD, S, ‘Policy Issues in Defective Property Cases’ in JW Neyers, E Chamberlain and SGA Pitel (eds), Emerging Issues in Tort Law (Hart Publishing, Oxford, forthcoming 2007).
212. TREITEL, GH, The Law of Contract, 11th edn (Sweet & Maxwell, London, 2003).
213. TRINDALE, FA, and Cane, P, The Law of Torts in Australia, 3rd edn (Oxford University Press, Melbourne, 1999).
214. UNDERWOOD, P, ‘Is Ms Donoghue’s Snail in Mortal Peril?’ (2004) 12 Torts Law Journal 39.
215. UNGER, R, ‘The Critical Legal Studies Movement’ (1983) 96 Harvard Law Review 561.
216. UNGER, R, What Should Legal Analysis Become? (Verso, New York, 1996).
217. VORSTER, JP, ‘A Comment on the Meaning of Objectivity in Contract’ (1987) 103 LQR 274.
218. WADDAMS, SM, ‘Causation in Canada and Australia’ (1993) 1 Tort Law Review 75.
219. WADDAMS, SM, Dimensions of Private Law: Categories and Concepts in Anglo-American Legal Reasoning (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003).
220. WADDAMS, SM, ‘Breach of Contract and Claims by Third Parties’ in JW Neyers, E Chamberlain and SGA Pitel (eds), Emerging Issues in Tort Law (Hart Publishing, Oxford, forthcoming 2007).
221. WALKER, DM, The Oxford Companion to Law (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1980).
222. WATSON, A, Legal History and a Common Law for Europe (Institutet för Rättshistorisk Forskning, Stockholm, 2001).
223. WEATHERFORD, RC, ‘Determinism’ in T Honderich (ed), The Oxford Companion to Philosophy (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1995).
224. WEINRIB, EJ, ‘A Step Forward in Factual Causation’ (1975) 38 MLR 518.
225. WEINRIB, EJ, ‘Illegality as a Tort Defence’ (1976) 26 University of Toronto Law Journal 28.
226. WEINRIB, EJ, ‘The Case for a Duty to Rescue’ (1980) 90 Yale Law Journal 247.
227. WEINRIB, EJ, ‘Towards a Moral Theory of Negligence Law’ (1983) 2 Law and Philosophy 37.
228. WEINRIB, EJ, ‘Legal Formalism: On the Immanent Rationality of Law’ (1988) 97 Yale Law Journal 949.
229. WEINRIB, EJ, The Idea of Private Law (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass, 1995).
230. WEINRIB, EJ, Tort Law: Cases and Materials (Emond Montgomery Publications Ltd, Toronto, 1997).
231. WEINRIB, EJ, ‘Does Tort Law Have a Future?’ (2000) 34 Valparaiso University Law Review 561.
232. WEINRIB, EJ, ‘Restitutionary Damages as Corrective Justice’ (2000) 1 Theoretical Inquiries in Law 1.
233. WEINRIB, EJ, ‘Correlativity, Personality, and the Emerging Consensus on Corrective Justice’ (2001) 2 Theoretical Inquiries in Law 107.
234. WEINRIB, EJ, ‘Corrective Justice in a Nutshell’ (2002) 52 University of Toronto Law Journal 349.
235. WEINRIB, EJ, ‘Deterrence and Corrective Justice’ (2002) 50 University of California of Los Angeles Law Review 621.
236. WEINRIB, EJ, ‘Punishment and Disgorgement as Contract Remedies’ (2003) 78 Chicago-Kent Law Review 55.
237. WEINRIB, LE, and WEINRIB, EJ, ‘Constitutional Values and Private Law in Canada’ in D Friedmann and D Barak-Erez (eds), Human Rights in Private Law (Hart Publishing, Oxford, 2001).
238. WEIR, T, Economic Torts (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1997).
239. WEIR, T, ‘The Staggering March of Negligence’ in P Cane and J Stapleton (eds), The Law of Obligations: Essays in Celebration of John Fleming (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1998).
240. WEIR, T, Tort Law (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002).
241. WHEAT, K, ‘Proximity and Nervous Shock’ (2003) 32 Common Law World Review 313.
242. WHITTAKER, S, ‘Privity of Contract and the Tort of Negligence: Future Directions’ (1996) 16 OJLS 191.
243. WILLIAMS, G, Joint Torts and Contributory Negligence (Stevens, London, 1951).
244. WILLIAMS, G, ‘The Risk Principle’ (1961) 77 LQR 179.
245. WINFIELD, PH, ‘The History of Negligence’ (1926) 42 LQR 184.
246. WITTING, C, ‘Justifying Liability to Third Parties for Negligent Misstatements’ (2000) 20 OJLS 615.
247. WITTING, C, ‘Distinguishing Between Property Damage and Pure Economic Loss in Negligence: A Personality Thesis’ (2001) 21 LS 481.
248. WITTING, C, ‘The Three-Stage Test Abandoned in Australia—or Not?’ (2002) 118 LQR 214.
249. WITTING, C, ‘Physical Damage in Negligence’ (2002) 61 CLJ 189.
250. WOOD, A, Kant’s Ethical Thought (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999).
251. WRIGHT, RW, ‘Causation in Tort Law’ (1985) 73 California Law Review 1735.
252. WRIGHT, RW, ‘Causation, Responsibility, Risk, Probability, Naked Statistics and Proof: Pruning the Bramble Bush by Clarifying the Concepts’ (1988) 73 Iowa Law Review 1001.
253. WRIGHT, RW, ‘Once more into the Bramble Bush: Duty, Causal Contribution, and the Extent of Legal Responsibility’ (2001) 54 Vanderbilt Law Review 1071.
254. WRIGHT, RW, ‘Negligence in the Courts: Introduction and Commentary’ (2002) 77 Chicago-Kent Law Review 425.
255. WRIGHT, RW, ‘Justice and Reasonable Care in Negligence Law’ (2002) 47 American Journal of Jurisprudence 143.
256. WRIGHT, RW, ‘Hand, Posner, and the Myth of the “Hand Formula”’ (2003) 4 Theoretical Inquiries in Law 145.
257. WRIGHT, RW, ‘Acts and Omissions as Positive and Negative Causes’ in JW Neyers, E Chamberlain and SGA Pitel (eds), Emerging Issues in Tort Law (Hart Publishing, Oxford, forthcoming 2007).
258. ZIMMERMANN, R, The Law of Obligations: Roman Foundations of the Civilian Tradition (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1996).
259. ZIMMERMANN, R, Roman Law, Contemporary Law, European Law: The Civilian Tradition Today (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2001).
260. ZIPURSKY, BC, ‘Civil Recourse, Not Corrective Justice’ (2003) 91 Georgetown Law Journal 695.