Knowledge, Context, and the Agent’s Point of View

Contextualism in Philosophy: Knowledge, Meaning, and Truth

Volumn , Issue , 2023, Pages 91-114

  Williamson, Timothy ^a  

^a NEW COLLEGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85195355694     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (32)

1. Armstrong, D. (1973). Belief, Truth and Knowledge (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
2. Cohen, S. (1987). ‘Knowledge, Context, and Social Standards’, Synthese, 73: 3-26.
3. Cohen, S.(1988). ‘How to be a Fallibilist’, Philosophical Perspectives, 2: 91-123.
4. Cohen, S.(1999). ‘Contextualism, Skepticism, and the Structure of Reasons’, Philosophical Perspectives, 13: 57-89.
5. Cohen, S.(2001). ‘Contextualism Defended: Comments on Richard Feldman’s ‘‘Skeptical Problems, Contextualist Solutions’’ ’. Philosophical Studies, 103: 87-98.
6. Craig, E. (1990). Knowledge and the State of Nature: An Essay in Conceptual Synthesis (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
7. DeRose, K. (1992). ‘Contextualism and Knowledge Attributions’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 52: 913-29.
8. DeRose, K.(1995). ‘Solving the Skeptical Puzzle’, Philosophical Review, 104: 1-52.
9. DeRose, K.(2002). ‘Assertion, Knowledge, and Context’, Philosophical Review 111: 167-203.
10. DeRose, K.(2004). ‘The Problem with Subject-Sensitive Invariantism’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68: 346-50.
11. Dretske, F. (1970). ‘Epistemic Operators’, Journal of Philosophy, 67: 1007-23.
12. Dretske, F.(1981). Knowledge and the Flow of Information (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press).
13. Feldman, R. (2001). ‘Skeptical Problems, Contextualist Solutions’, Philosophical Studies, 103: 61-85.
14. Goldman, A. (1976). ‘Discrimination and Perceptual Knowledge’, Journal of Philosophy, 73: 771-91.
15. Goldman, A.(1986). Epistemology and Cognition (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press).
16. Hawthorne, J. (2003). Knowledge and Lotteries (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
17. Hofweber, T. (1999). ‘Contextualism and the Meaning-Intention Problem’, in K. Korta, E. Sosa, and X. Arrazola (eds.), Cognition, Agency and Rationality: Proceedings of the Fifth International Colloquium on Cognitive Science (Dordrecht: Reidel).
18. Kamp, H. (1981). ‘The Paradox of the Heap’, in U. Mönnich (ed.), Aspects of Philosophical Logic (Dordrecht: Reidel).
19. Kaplan, D. (1989). ‘Demonstratives: An Essay on the Semantics, Logic, Metaphysics, and Epistemology of Demonstratives and Other Indexicals’, in J. Almog, J. Perry, and H. Wettstein (eds.), Themes from Kaplan (New York: Oxford University Press).
20. Lewis, D. (1979). ‘Scorekeeping in a Language Game’, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 8: 339-59.
21. Lewis, D.(1996). ‘Elusive Knowledge’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 74: 549-67.
22. Nozick, R. (1981). Philosophical Explanations (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
23. Rysiew, P. (2001). ‘The Context-Sensitivity of Knowledge Attributions’, Noûs, 35: 477-514.
24. Schiffer, S. (1996). ‘Contextualist Solutions to Scepticism’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 96: 317-33.
25. Stanley, J. (2003). ‘Context, Interest-Relativity and the Sorites’, Analysis, 63: 269-80.
26. Stanley, J.(forthcoming). Knowledge and Interests (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
27. Stine, G. (1976). ‘Skepticism, Relevant Alternatives, and Deductive Closure’, Philosophical Studies, 29: 249-61.
28. Sutton, J. (forthcoming). ‘Stick to What you Know’, Noûs.
29. Unger, P. (1986). ‘The Cone Model of Knowledge’, Philosophical Topics, 14: 125-78.
30. Williamson, T. (2000). Knowledge and its Limits (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
31. Williamson, T.(2001). ‘Comments on Michael Williams’ ‘‘Contextualism, Externalism and Epistemic Standards’’ ’, Philosophical Studies, 103: 25-33.
32. Williamson, T.(2005). ‘Contextualism, Subject-Sensitive Invariantism and Knowledge of Knowledge’, Philosophical Quarterly, 55: 213-35.