Compositionality and Context

Contextualism in Philosophy: Knowledge, Meaning, and Truth

Volumn , Issue , 2023, Pages 303-348

  Pagin, Peter ^a  

^a STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85195348103     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (54)

1. Bach, K. (1994). ‘Semantic Slack: What is Said and More’, in S. Tsohatzidis (ed.), Foundations of Speech Act Theory (London: Routledge), 267-91.
2. Borg, E. (2004). Minimal Semantics (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
3. Cappelen, H., and E. Lepore (2002). ‘Indexicality, Binding, Anaphora and a Priori Truth’, Analysis, 62: 271-81.
4. Chomsky, N. (1966). Topics in the Theory of Generative Grammar (in Janua Linguarium) (The Hague: Mouton & Co.).
5. Partly reprinted in J. Searle (ed.), The Philosophy of Language (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1971). Page references to the reprint.
6. Chomsky, N.(1980). Rules and Representations (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).
7. Crimmins, M. (1992). Talk of Beliefs, (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press).
8. Crimmins, M.and J. Perry (1989). ‘The Prince and the Phone Booth: Reporting Puzzling Beliefs’, Journal of Philosophy, 86: 685-711.
9. Davidson, D. (1967). ‘Truth and Meaning’, Synthese, 17: 304-23.
10. Reprinted in Davidson, Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984), 17-36. Page references to the reprint.
11. Davidson, D.(1973). ‘Radical Interpretation’, Dialectica, 27: 313-28.
12. Reprinted in Davidson, Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984), 125-39. Page references to the reprint.
13. Davidson, D.(1986). ‘A Nice Derangement of Epitaphs’, in E Lepore (ed.), The Philosophy of Donald Davidson: Perspectives on Truth and Interpretation (Oxford: Blackwell).
14. Fodor, J. (1987). Psychosemantics, (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press).
15. Fodor, J.(2001). ‘Language, Thought and Compositionality’, Mind and Language, 16: 1-15.
16. Frege, G. (1918-19). ‘Der Gedanke: Eine logische Untersuchung’, Beiträge zur deutschen Idealismus, 2. 58-77. In English as ‘The Thought. A Logical Inquiry’, tr. A. M. and Marcelle Quinton, in P. F. Strawson (ed.), Philosophical Logic. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1967). Page references to the translation.
17. Fodor, J.(1923). ‘Gedankengefüge’, Beträge zur Philosophie des Deutschen Idealismus, 36-51.
18. Reprinted in Frege, Logische Untersuchungen (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1976). In English as ‘Compound Thoughts’, tr. R. StoothoV, Mind, 72 (1963), 1-17. Page references to the translation.
19. Groenendijk, J. and M. Stokhof (1991). ‘Dynamic Predicate Logic’, Linguistics and Philosophy, 14: 39-100.
20. Hendriks, H. (2001). ‘Compositionality and Model-Theoretic Interpretation’, Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 10: 29-48.
21. Higginbotham, J. (1986). ‘Linguistic Theory and Davidson’s Program in Semantics’, in E. Lepore (ed.), The Philosophy of Donald Davidson: Perspecives on Truth and Interpretation (Oxford: Blackwell).
22. Hintikka, J. and G. Sandu (1997). ‘Game-Theoretical Semantics’, in A. ter Meulen and J. van Benthem (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic (Amsterdam: Elsevier).
23. Hodges, W. (1997). ‘Compositional Semantics for a Language of Imperfect Information’, Journal of the IPGL, 5: 539-63.
24. Hodges, W.(1998). ‘Compositionality is Not the Problem’, Logic and Logical Philosophy, 6: 7-33.
25. Hodges, W.(2001). ‘Formal Features of Compositionality’, Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 10: 7-28.
26. Janssen, T. (1984). Foundations and Applications of Montague Grammar (Amsterdam: Centre for Mathematics and Computer Science).
27. Janssen, T.(1997). ‘Compositionality’, in J. van Benthem and A. ter Meulen (eds.), Handbook of Logic and Language (Amsterdam and Cambridge, Mass.: Elsevier and MIT Press), 417-73.
28. Kamp, H. and U. Reyle (1993). From Discourse to Logic (Dordrecht: Kluwer).
29. Kaplan, D. (1989). ‘Demonstratives’, in J. Almog, J. Perry, and H. Wettstein (eds.), Themes from Kaplan (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 481-563.
30. King, J. and J. Stanley (2005). ‘Semantics, Pragmatics, and the Role of Semantic Content’, in Z. Szabó (ed.), Semantics vs. Pragmatics (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
31. Montague, R. (1968). ‘Pragmatics’, in R. Klibansky (ed.), Contemporary Philosophy: A Survey (Florence).
32. Reprinted in R. Thomason (ed.), Formal Philosophy: Selected Papers of Richard Montague (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1974), 95-118. Page references to the reprint.
33. Montague, R.(1970a). ‘Pragmatics and Intensional Logic’, Synthese, 22: 68-94.
34. Reprinted in R. Thomason (ed.), Formal Philosophy: Selected Papers of Richard Montague (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1974), 119-47. Page references to the reprint.
35. Montague, R. (1970b). ‘Universal Grammar’, Theoria, 36: 373-98.
36. Reprinted in R. Thomason (ed.), Formal Philosophy: Selected Papers of Richard Montague New Haven: Yale University Press, 1974). Page references to the reprint.
37. Pagin, P. (1999). ‘Radical Interpretation and Compositional Structure’, in U. Zeglen (ed.), Discussions with Donald Davidson; Truth, Meaning and Knowledge (London: Routledge).
38. Pagin, P.(2002). ‘Rule-Following, Compositionality and the Normativity of Meaning’, in D. Prawitz (ed.), Meaning and Interpretation (Konferenser, 55; Stockholm: Kungl. Vitterhets Historie och Antikvitetsakademien).
39. Pagin, P.(2003). ‘Communication and Strong Compositionality’, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 32: 287-322.
40. Pagin, P.(n.d.), ‘What is Communicative Success?’, unpublished.
41. Pagin, P.and D. Westerståhl (1993). ‘Predicate Logic with Flexibly Binding Operators and Natural Language Semantics’, Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 2: 89-128.
42. Partee, B. (1984). ‘Compositionality’, in F. Landman and F. Veltman (eds.), Varieties of Formal Semantics: Proceedings of the Fourth Amsterdam Colloquium (Dordrecht: Foris).
43. Pelletier, J. (1994). ‘On an Argument against Semantic Compositionality’, in D. Prawitz and D. Westerståhl (eds.), Logic and Methodology of Science in Uppsala (Dordrecht: Kluwer), 599-610.
44. Pelletier, J.(1994b). ‘The Principle of Semantic Compositionality’, Topoi 13: 11-24.
45. Pelletier, J.(2003). ‘Context Dependence and Compositionality’, Mind and Language, 2: 148-61.
46. Perry, J. (1986). ‘Thought without Representation’, Supplementary Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 60: 137-52.
47. Reprinted in Perry, The Problem of the Essential Indexical and Other Essays (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993). Page references to the reprint.
48. Perry, J.(2001). Reference and Reflexivity (Stanford, Calif.: CSLI Publications).
49. Recanati, F. (1993). Direct Reference: From Language to Thought, (Oxford: Blackwell).
50. Recanati, F.(2003). ‘Unarticulated Constituents’, Linguistics and Philosophy, 25: 299-345.
51. Rumelhart, D. (1979). ‘Some Problems with the Notion of Literal Meanings’, in A. Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and Thought (2nd edn., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 71-82.
52. Rumelhart, D.and Z. Szabó (2000). ‘On Quantifier Domain Restriction’, Mind and Language, 15: 219-61.
53. Westerståhl, D. (2002). ‘On the Compositionality of Idioms: An Abstract Approach’, in D. Barker-Plummer, D. Beaver, J. van Benthem, and P. Scotto di Luzio (eds.), Words, Proofs and Diagrams (Stanford, Calif.: CSLI Publications), 241-72.
54. Westerståhl, D.(2004). ‘On the Compositional Extension Problem’, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 33: 549-82.