The European Employment Strategy and the Challenges of Enlargement

European Union Law for the Twenty-First Century: Rethinking the New Legal Order: Volume 1

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 415-436

  Velluti, Samantha ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85194845259     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (31)

1. Anna Diamantopoulou, Employment and Social Affairs Commissioner, Informal Labour and Social Affairs Council, Burgos, 18–19 January 2003.
2. E Tulmets, ‘The EU PHARE/Twinning Programme as a Socialisation Instrument in the Enlarging Europe: Between Organisational Impact and Transfer of Norms’, paper presented at the 33rd UACES Annual Conference, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, 2
3. M Steffens, The EU’s Acquis as an Evolving Transformation Framework for the CEE: From the Classical to the New Enlargement Method, paper presented at the 33rd UACES Annual Conference, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, 2–4 September 2003.
4. G Bermann, ‘Law in an Enlarged European Union’ (2001) 14(3) EUSA Review 1–5. 11Idem. 12Idem.
5. A Evans, ‘Voluntary Harmonisation in Integration between the European Community and Eastern Europe’ (1997)
6. E Piontek, ‘Central and Eastern European Countries in Preparation for Membership in the European Union — a Polish Perspective’ (1997) 1 Yearbook of Polish European Studies 73, emphasis added.
7. M Celin, ‘European Employment Strategy: the right answer for candidate countries?’ (2003) 1 Transfer 88
8. Editorial ‘Employment in the European Union candidate countries’ (2003) 350 European Industrial Relations Review 22–27.
9. A Albi, ‘Referendums in Eastern Europe: The Effects on Reforming the EU Treaties and on the Candidate Countries’ Positions in the Convention’, RSC No 2002/65.
10. J Scott and DM Trubek, ‘Mind the Gap: Law and New Approaches to Governance in the European Union,’ (2002) 8(1) European Law Journal 6–8. The authors identify and describe succinctly six factors, which have fostered the increase in the use of ‘new governance’ instruments.
11. DM Trubek and J Mosher, ‘New Governance, EU Employment Policy, and the European Social Model,’ in Symposium: Responses to the European Commission’s White Paper on Governance, sections 5–6. Available at: http:www.jeanmonnetprogram.org/ papers/01/0100501.html.
12. J Goetschy, ‘The European Employment Strategy, Multilevel Governance and Policy Co-ordination: Past, Present and Future,’ in Zeitlin and Trubek (eds), Governing work and welfare in a new economy: European and American experiments (Oxford, OUP, 2003).
13. J Goetschy, ‘The European Employment Strategy, Multi-level Governance and Policy Co-ordination: Past, Present and Future,’ in Zeitlin and Trubek (eds), Governing work and welfare in a new economy: European and American experiments (Oxford, OUP, 2003).
14. J Goetschy, ‘The European Employment Strategy: Genesis and Development,’ (1999) 5(2) European Journal of Industrial Relations 132.
15. P Syrpis, ‘Legitimising European Governance: Taking Subsidiarity Seriously within the Open Method of Co-ordination’ EUI Working Paper, 2002.
16. S Ball, ‘The European Employment Strategy: The Will but not the Way?’ (2001) Industrial Law Journal 359–66
17. P Syrpis, ‘Smoke Without Fire: The Social Policy Agenda and the Internal Market,’ (2001) 30(3) Industrial Law Journal 271–88.
18. Contra, J Goetschy, ‘The European Employment Strategy: Genesis and Development,’ (1999) 5(2) European Journal of Industrial Relations 132.
19. P Teague, ‘Deliberative Governance and EU Social Policy,’ 2001 7(1) European Journal of Industrial Relations 7–26.
20. M Ferrara, A Hemerijk and M Rhodes, The Future of Social Europe: Recasting Work and Welfare in the New Economy (Oxford, OUP, 2001)
21. DM Trubek and J Mosher ‘New Governance, EU Employment Policy, and the European Social Model’ in Symposium: Responses to the European Commission’s White Paper on Governance, sections 5 & 6. Available at: http:www.jeanmonnetprogram.org/papers/01/0100501.html.
22. C Degryse and P Pochet, ‘Social Developments in the European Union, Second Annual Report,’ OSE and ETUI, Brussels, 2001, 16–19, [online]. Available at: http://www.ose.be/en/default.htm.
23. D Dolowitz and D Marsh, ‘Learning from Abroad: The Role of Policy Transfer in Contemporary Policy-Making’ (2000) 13(1) Governance 5–24.
24. S Sciarra, ‘Global or Re-nationalised? Past and Future of European Labour Law’ in F Snyder (ed), The Europeanisation of Law: The Legal Effects of European Integration (Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2000) 270–71.
25. Keller and Bansbach, ‘Social Dialogues: an interim report on recent results and prospects,’ (1999/2000) Industrial Review Journal Annual Review 84.
26. C Lafoucrière, ‘The European Employment Strategy — The Third Pillar: Adaptability,’ ETUI, DWP 2000.01.03, p 31; see also 22–24 and 29–31.
27. E Szyszczak, ‘The New Paradigm for Social Policy: A Virtuous Circle?’ (2001) 38 CML Rev 1141.
28. D Hodson and I Maher, ‘The Open Method of Co-ordination as a new mode of governance: The case of soft economic policy co-ordination’ (2001) 39(4) JCMS 730–32.
29. S Velluti, ‘Towards the Constitutionalisation of New Forms of Governance: A Revised Institutional Framework for the European Employment Strategy’ (2003) 22 Yearbook of European Law 353–405.
30. Szyszczak, ‘The Evolving European Employment Strategy,’ in J Shaw (ed), Social Law and Policy in an Evolving European Union (Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2000) 197.
31. N Bruun, ‘The European Employment Strategy and the ‘Acquis Communitaire’ of Labour Law’ (2001) 17(3) International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations 309–24, who exhaustively illustrates and explains the relationship between the EES and EC Labour Law.