Impact Assessment in the EU

Better Regulation

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 271-286

  Chittenden, Francis ^a   Ambler, Tim ^b   Xiao, Deming ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b LONDON BUSINESS SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85194718298     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (22)

1. RE Lofstedt, ‘The Swing of the Regulatory Pendulum in Europe: From Precautionary Principle to Regulatory Impact Analysis’ (2004) 28 Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 237.
2. F Vibert, ‘The Limits of Regulatory Reform in EU’ (2006) 26 Journal of Institute of Economic Affairs 3, at 17-21.
3. N Lee and C Kirkpatrick, ‘Evidence-based Policy-making in Europe: An Evaluation of European Commission Integrated Impact Assessments’ (2006) 2
4. Office of Management and Budget, ‘Report to Congress on the Costs and Benefits of Federal Regulations’ (Washington, DC, The White House, 1997).
5. OECD, Regulatory Policies in OECD Countries: From Interventionism to Regulatory Governance (Paris, OECD, 2002).
6. JL Guash and RW Hahn, ‘The Costs and Benefits of Regulation: Implications for Developing Countries’ (1999) 14 The World Bank Research Observer 1.
7. RE Lofstedt ‘The Swing of the Regulatory Pendulum in Europe: From Precautionary Principle to Regulatory Impact Analysis’,(2004) 28 Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 237.
8. S Djankov, E Glaeser, R La Porta, F Lopez-de-Silanes, and A Shleifer, ‘The New Comparative Economics’ (2003) XXXI Journal of Comparative Economics 595.
9. CM Radaelli, ‘The Diffusion of Regulatory Impact Analysis—Best Practice or Lessondrawing’ (2004) 43 European Journal of Political Research 723.
10. BRTF, Principles of Better Regulation (London, Cabinet Office, 2005).
11. F Vibert, ‘The Limits of Regulatory Reform in EU’ (2006) 26 Journal of Institute of Economic Affairs 2, at 17-21.
12. T Ambler, F Chittenden and C Hwang, Regulation: Another Form of Taxation? (London, British Chambers of Commerce, 2005).
13. European Commission Impact Assessment Guidelines, above n17.
14. European Commission Communication on Impact Assessment, COM(2002)76.
15. ‘Unlocking Europe’s Full Potential’, Commission Legislative and Work Programme 2006, COM(2005)531 final, available at http://ec.europa.eu/governance/impact/docs/ia_2006/com_2005_0531_en.pdf.
16. T Ambler, F Chittenden and K Ahuja, Regulators: Box Tickers or Burdens Busters? (London, British Chambers of Commerce, 2006)
17. T Ambler, F Chittenden and C Hwang, Regulation: Another Form of Taxation (London, British Chambers of Commerce, 2005)
18. T Ambler, F Chittenden and M Obodovski, Are Regulators Raising Their Game? UK Regulatory Impact Assessments in 2002/3 (London, British Chambers of Commerce, 2004)
19. T Ambler, F Chittenden and M Shamutkova, Do Regulators Play By the Rules? An Audit of UK Regulatory Impact Assessments (London, British Chambers of Commerce, 2003).
20. F Vibert, The EU’s New System of Regulatory Impact Assessment—A Scorecard (London, European Policy Forum, 2004)
21. F Vibert, The Itch to Regulate: Confirmation Bias and the EC’s New System of Impact Assessment (London, European Policy Forum, 2005).
22. T Ambler, F Chittenden and M Obodovski, How Much Regulation is Gold Plate? A Study of UK Elaboration of EU Directives (London, British Chambers of Commerce, 2004).