The Method of a Truly Normative Legal Science

Methodologies of Legal Research: Which Kind of Method for What Kind of Discipline?

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 19-44

  Hage, Jaap ^a,b  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b HASSELT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85193642332     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (46)

1. AD de Groot, Methodologie ('s-Gravenhage, Mouton, 1961) chapter 1.
2. R Dworkin, Taking Rights Seriously, 2nd edn (London, Duckworth, 1978).
3. JC Hage, Reasoning with Rules (Dordrecht, Kluwer, 1997) chapter 2.
4. C Redondo, Reasons for Action and the Law (Dordrecht, Kluwer, 1999).
5. S Haack, Philosophy of Logics (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1978)
6. LTF Gamut, Logic, Language, and Meaning, 2 vols (Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1990).
7. KR Popper, ‘Truth, Rationality, and the Growth of Scientific Knowledge' in KR Popper, Conjectures and Refutation, 4th edn (London, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1972) 215–50.
8. C Brink, ‘Verisimilitude' in Newton-Smith, Companion to the Philosophy of Science (Oxford, Blackwell, 2000) 561–63.
9. J Rawls, A Theory of Justice, 1st edn (Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1971) section 9.
10. N Daniels, ‘Reflective Equilibrium', which can be found at www.plato.stanford.edu/entries/reflective-equilibrium (last consulted 11 October 2009).
11. R Harré, The Philosophies of Science (Oxford University Press, 1985) chapter 2
12. AF Chalmers, What is this thing called Science?, 3rd edn (Indianapolis, Hackett, 1999) chapters 4–5.
13. EM Barth and ECW Krabbe, From Axiom to Dialogue (Berlin, Walter de Gruyter, 1982).
14. J Smits, Omstreden rechtswetenschap (Den Haag, Boom Juridische uitgevers, 2009) 93f.
15. JC Hage, Studies in Legal Logic (Dordrecht, Springer, 2005) 227– 64.
16. HLA Hart, The Concept of Law, 2nd edn (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1994).
17. N MacCormick and O Weinberger, An Institutional Theory of Law (Dordrecht, Reidel, 1986)
18. E Lagerspetz, The Opposite Mirrors (Dordrecht, Kluwer, 1995)
19. DWP Ruiter, Institutional Legal Facts (Dordrecht, Kluwer, 1993)
20. DWP Ruiter, Legal Institutions (Dordrecht, Kluwer, 2001)
21. N MacCormick, Institutions of Law (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2007).
22. J Bell, ‘Legal Research and the Distinctiveness of Comparative Law'.
23. J Austin, The Province of Jurisprudence Determined, several edns, note to the 5th lecture.
24. LLH Fuller, The Morality of Law, revised edn (New Haven, Yale University Press, 1969) chapter 2.
25. B Leiter, Naturalizing Jurisprudence (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2007) 30–46.
26. H Kornbluth (ed), Naturalizing Epistemology, 2nd edn (Cambridge, MIT Press, 1994).
27. GE Langemeijer, Inleiding tot de studie van de wijsbegeerte des rechts (Zwolle, Tjeenk Willink 1956) 296
28. G de Geest, ‘Hoe maken we van de rechtswetenschap een volwaardige wetenschap' (2004) 2 Nederlands Juristenblad 58–66
29. M Devitt, Realism and Truth, 2nd edn (Oxford, Blackwell, 1991) chapter 2.
30. M Hare, The Language of Morals (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1952) chapter 2.
31. PW Taylor, Normative Discourse (Englewood Cliffs, Prentice Hall, 1961) chapter 9.
32. R Alexy, Theorie der juristischen Argumentation (Frankfurt, Suhrkamp, 1978) 273–78
33. N MacCormick, Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1978) chapter 2 (on ‘first order justification').
34. ML Ginsberg (ed), Readings in Nonmonotonic Reasoning (Los Altos, Morgan Kaufman, 1987) 1f.
35. Hans Albert, Traktat über kritische Vernunft (Tübingen, Mohr, 1980) section 2.
36. K Lehrer, ‘Coherentism' in J Dancy and E Sosa (eds), A Companion to Epistemology (Oxford, Blackwell, 1992) 67–70.
37. R Alexy and A Peczenik, ‘The Concept of Coherence and its Significance for Discursive Rationality' (1990) 3 Ratio Juris 130.
38. JC Hage, ‘Law and Coherence' (2004) 17 Ratio Juris 87. See also Hage (n 25) 58–59.
39. ‘Dialectics in Artificial Intelligence and Law' in Hage (n 25) 227–64.
40. J Raz, ‘The Relevance of Coherence' in J Raz, Ethics in the Public Domain (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1994) 277–325.
41. KR Popper, ‘Epistemology Without a Knowing Subject' and ‘On the Theory of the Objective Mind' in KR Popper, Objective Knowledge (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1972) 106–90.
42. R Neta and D Prichard (eds)¸ Arguing about Knowledge (London, Routledge, 2009) 151.
43. MD Hauser, Moral minds: How Nature Designed our Universal Sense of Right and Wrong (London, Abacus, 2008).
44. JC Hage, R Leenes and A Lodder, ‘Hard Cases: a Procedural Approach' (1994) 2 Artificial Intelligence and Law 113.
45. RL Kirkham, Theories of Truth (Cambridge, MIT Press, 1992) 81.
46. R Dworkin, Law's Empire (London, Fontana, 1986) chapters 6 and 7.