The EU Risk Management of Genetically Modified Organisms and the Commission's Defence Strategy in the Biotech Dispute: Are They Inconsistent?

Biotechnology and International Law

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 387-402

  Poli, Sara ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TRIESTE   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85193613253     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (11)

1. Kerr, ‘Genetically Modified Organisms at the World Trade Organisation—a Harvest of Trouble' (2003) 37 Journal of World Trade 1083–1095.
2. Scott, ‘European Regulation of GMOs: Thinking about “Judicial Review” in the WTO', (2004) Jean Monnet working paper, 4, 2.
3. Christoforou, ‘The Regulation of Genetically Modified Organisms in the European Union: The Interplay of Science, Law and Politics' (2004) 41 Common Market Law Review 637
4. Poli, ‘The Overhaul of the European Legislation on GMOs, Genetically Modified Food and Feed: Mission Accomplished. What Now?' (2004) 11 Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 1, 13.
5. Walker, ‘The Myth of Science as a “Neutral Arbiter” for Triggering Precautions', (2003) 26 Boston College International & Comparative Law Review, 184.
6. Vos, (2004) 11 Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 187.
7. Motaal, ‘The “Multilateral Scientific Consensus” and the World Trade Organisation' (2004) 38 Journal of World Trade 856.
8. Scott, ‘International Trade and environmental Governance: Relating Rules (and Standards) in the EU and the WTO' (2004) 15 European Journal International Law 307
9. Peel, ‘Risk Regulation under the WTO SPS Agreement: Science as International Normative yardstick?' (2004) Jean Monnet working paper, 2, 38–39.
10. Hudec, ‘Science and Post-discriminatory WTO Law', (2003) 26 Boston College International & Comparative Law Review 184
11. V. Heiskanen, ‘The regulatory philosophy of international trade law': (2003) 38 Journal of World Trade 35