Analysing Evidence Case Law

Innovations in Evidence and Proof: Integrating Theory, Research and Teaching

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 119-138

  Redmayne, Mike ^a  

^a LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85192935885     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (34)

1. J Kadane and D Schum, A Probabilistic Analysis of the Sacco and Vanzetti Evidence (Chichester, Wiley, 1996).
2. M Redmayne, ‘The Relevance of Bad Character’ (2002) 61 CLJ 684
3. D Hamer, ‘The Structure and Strength of the Propensity Inference: Singularity, Linkage and the Other Evidence’ (2003) 29 Monash U L Rev 137.
4. M Redmayne, ‘Evidence Rethought? A Commentary on Ian Dennis’s The Law of Evidence’ (2001) 1(2) International Commentary on Evidence (at www.bepress.com/ice/vol1/iss2/)
5. D Nicolson, ‘Truth, Reason and Justice: Epistemology and Politics in Evidence Discourse’ (1994) 57 MLR 726
6. Gender, Epistemology and Ethics: Feminist Perspectives on Evidence Theory’ in M Childs and L Ellison, Feminist Perspectives on Evidence (London, Cavendish, 2000).
7. D McCord, ‘“But Perry Mason Made it Look so Easy!”: the Admissibility of Evidence Offered by a Criminal Defendant to Suggest that Someone Else is Guilty’ (1996) 63 Tennessee L Rev 917
8. KA Findley and MS Scott, ‘The Multiple Dimensions of Tunnel Vision in Criminal Cases’ [2006] Wisconsin L Rev 291, 342–9.
9. P Roberts and A Zuckerman, Criminal Evidence (Oxford, OUP, 2004) 105
10. C Allen, Practical Guide to Evidence (2nd edn, London, Cavendish, 2001) 14–15
11. A Choo ‘The Notion of Relevance and Defence Evidence’ [1993] Crim LR 114.
12. D Birch, ‘Hearsay Logic and Hearsay Fiddles: Blastland Revisited’ in P Smith (ed), Criminal Law: Essays in Honour of JC Smith (London, Butterworths, 1987).
13. R Friedman, The Elements of Evidence (2nd edn, St Paul, MN, West Publishing, 1998) 45–57.
14. B Robertson and GA Vignaux, Interpreting Evidence: Evaluating Forensic Science in the Courtroom (Chichester, Wiley, 1995) ch 3.
15. D Davis and W Follette, ‘Rethinking the Probative Value of Evidence: Base Rates, Intuitive Profiling, and the “Postdiction” of Behavior’ (2002) 26 Law and Human Behavior 133
16. R Friedman and R Park, ‘Sometimes what Everybody Thinks They Know is True’ (2003) 27 Law and Human Behavior 629
17. D Kaye and J Koehler, ‘The Misquantification of Probative Value’ (2003) 27 Law and Human Behavior 645.
18. G Wells, ‘Murder, Extramarital Affairs, and the Issue of Probative Value’ (2003) 27 Law and Human Behavior 623.
19. M Hirst, ‘Conduct, Relevance and the Hearsay Rule’ (1993) 13 Legal Studies 54, 65.
20. D Birch, ‘Suffering in Silence: a Cost-Benefit Analysis of Section 34 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994’ [1999] Crim LR 769, 776
21. J Jackson, ‘Interpreting the Silence Provisions: the Northern Ireland Cases’ [1995] Crim LR 587, 600.
22. C Tapper, Cross and Tapper on Evidence (10th edn, London, Butterworths, 2004) 686.
23. K Grevling, ‘Silence, Lies and Vicious Circularity’ in P Mirfield and R Smith (eds), Essays for Colin Tapper (London, Butterworths, 2003).
24. R Munday, ‘Inferences and Explanations’ (2000) 2 Archbold News 6.
25. D Hamer, ‘“Hoist with his Own Petard”? Guilty Lies and Ironic Inferences in Criminal Proof’ (2001) 54 Current Legal Problems 377.
26. M McConville and J Hodgson, Custodial Legal Advice and the Right to Silence (London, HMSO, 1993).
27. G Gudjonsson, The Psychology of Interrogations and Confessions: a Handbook (Chichester, John Wiley, 2003) 176–7.
28. I Dennis, The Law of Evidence (2nd edn, London, Sweet & Maxwell, 2002) 156–9.
29. D Hamer, ‘The Privilege of Silence and the Persistent Risk of Self-Incrimination: Part I’ (2004) 28 Criminal Law Journal 160, and ‘Part II’ at 200.
30. RD Friedman, ‘Character Impeachment: Psycho-Bayesian [!?] Analysis and a Proposed Overhaul’ (1991) 38 UCLA L Rev 637.
31. W Twining, Rethinking Evidence: Exploratory Essays (Evanston, IL, Northwestern University Press, 1994)
32. W Twining, ‘Evidence as a Multidisciplinary Subject’ (2003) 2 Law, Probability and Risk 91
33. TJ Anderson, ‘On Generalizations I: A Preliminary Exploration’ (1999) 40
34. T Anderson, D Schum and W Twining, Analysis of Evidence (2nd edn, Cambridge, CUP, 2005) ch 11.