Business processes in UML

UML and the Unified Process

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 315-331

  Rittgen, Peter ^a  

^a DARMSTADT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85189827105     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (18)

1. Barros, A., Duddy, K., Lawley, M., Milosevic, Z., Raymond, K., & Wood, A. (2000). Processes, roles, and events: UML concepts for enterprise architecture. In A. Evans, S. Kent, & B. Selic (Eds.), UML 2000-The Unified Modeling Language. Advancing the Standard. Third International Conference, York, UK, October 2000. Proceedings. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1939 (pp. 62-77, Berlin: Springer.
2. Becker, J., & Schütte, R. (1996). Handelsinformationssysteme. Landsberg.
3. Bruce, T. A. (1992). Designing quality databases with IDEF1X information models. New York: Dorset House.
4. Chen, R., & Scheer, A.-W. (1994). Modellierung von prozessketten mittels petri-netztheorie. Report 107, Institute of Information Systems, University Saarbrücken.
5. Dehnert, J., & Rittgen, P. (2001). Relaxed soundness of business processes. In K.R. Dittrich, A. Geppert, & M.C. Norrie (Eds.). Advanced Information Systems Engineering. 13th International Conference, CAiSE 2001, Interlaken, Switzerland, June 4-8, 2001. Proceedings. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2068 (pp. 157-170). Berlin: Springer.
6. Keller, G., & Teufel, T. (1997). SAP R/3 prozeßorientiert anwenden: Iteratives prozeßprototyping zur bildung von wertschöpfungsketten, (2. ed.). Bonn: Addison-Wesley-Longman.
7. Langner, P., Schneider, Ch., & Wehler, J. (1997). Prozessmodellierung mit Ereignisgesteuerten Prozessketten (EPKs) und Petri-Netzen. WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, 39(5) (pp. 479-489).
8. Nüttgens, M., Feld, T., & Zimmermann, V. (1998). Business process modeling with EPC and UML: Transformation or integration? In M. Schader, & A. Korthaus (Eds.). The Unified Modeling Language-Technical Aspects and Applications (pp. 250-261). Heidelberg: Springer
9. OMG (Ed.). (2000). OMG Unified Modeling Language specification: Version 1.3, March 2000. Needham: OMG.
10. Ould, M. (1995). Business processes: modeling and analysis for re-engineering and improvement. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
11. Peterson, J. L. (1981). Petri net theory and the modeling of systems. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
12. Rational Software, Microsoft, Hewlett-Packard, Oracle, Sterling Software, MCI Systemhouse, Unisys, ICON Computing, IntelliCorp, i-Logix, IBM, ObjecTime, Platinum Technology, Ptech, Taskon, Reich Technologies, & Softeam (1997). UML Notation Guide: Version 1.1, 1 September 1997. On the World Wide Web: http://www.rational.com/uml [1999, 04-17].
13. Rittgen, P. (1999). Modified EPCs and their formal semantics. Report 19, Institute of Information Systems. University Koblenz-Landau.
14. Rittgen, P. (2001). E-commerce software: From analysis to design. In A. Gangopadhyay (Ed.). Managing Business with Electronic Commerce: Issues and Trends (pp. 17-36). Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
15. Rosemann, M. (1996). Komplexitätsmanagement in prozeßmodellen: Methodenspezifische gestaltungsempfehlungen für die informationsmodellierung. Wiesbaden: Gabler.
16. Rump, F. (1997). Erreichbarkeitsgraphbasierte analyse ereignisgesteuerter prozessketten. Technical Report 04/97, OFFIS Institute, University Oldenburg.
17. Scheer, A.-W. (1999). ARIS-Business process modeling. (2 ed.). Berlin: Springer.
18. Simons, A. J. H., & Graham, I. (1999). 30 things that go wrong in object modelling with UML 1.3. In H. Kilov, B. Rumpe, I. Simmonds (Eds.). Behavioral Specifications of Businesses and Systems, Chapter 17 (pp. 237-257). Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Publishers.