Transforming UML class diagrams into relational data models

UML and the Unified Process

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 217-236

  Shah, Devang ^a   Slaughter, Sandra ^b  

^a eXcelon Corporation   (United States)

^b CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85189791490     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (30)

1. Ambler, Scott (2000). Mapping objects to relational databases. On the World Wide Web: http://www.AmbySoft.com
2. Bahrami, A. (1999). Object oriented system design using the Unified Modeling Language. New York: Irwin/McGraw-Hill.
3. Banerjee, J. (1987). Data model issues for object-oriented applications. ACM Transactions on Office Information System, 5(1) (pp. 3-26).
4. Batini, C., Ceri, S., & Navathe, S. (1992). Conceptual database design: An entityrelationship approach. New York: The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company, Inc.
5. Booch, G., Rumbaugh, J., & Jacobson, I. (1999). The Unified Modeling Language user guide. New York: Addison-Wesley.
6. Chen, P. (1976). The entity-relationship model-toward a unified view of data. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 1(1) (pp. 9-36).
7. Chen, P. (1977). The entity-relationship approach to logical data base design. New York: Q.E.D. Information Sciences, Inc.
8. Date, C. J. (2000). An introduction to database systems. New York: Addison-Wesley.
9. Dewitz, S. (1995). Systems analysis and design and the transition to objects. New York: McGraw-Hill.
10. nd ed.). New York: The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing, Inc.
11. nd ed.). Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
12. Gogolla, M. & Richters, M. (1998). Transformation rules for UML class diagram. The Unified Modeling Language <>'98: Beyond the Notation.
13. th International Conference.
14. Ling, T. & Teo, P. (1994). A normal form object-oriented entity relationship diagram. Technical Report, Department of Information Systems and Computer Science, National University of Singapore.
15. st Century. 2000 Information Resources Management Association International Conference, Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing (pp. 473-477).
16. Muller, R. (1999). Database design for smarties-using UML for data modeling. New York: Morgan Kaufman Publishers.
17. nd ed.). Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
18. Open Fusion (2002). Java data objects: A white paper. On the World Wide Web: http://www.prismtechnologies.com
19. Ou, Y. (1997). On mapping between UML and entity-relationship model.
20. Ou, Y. (1998). On using UML class diagrams for object-oriented database design-specification of integrity constraints. The Unified Modeling Language <>'98: Beyond the Notation.
21. Page-Jones, M. (1988). The practical guide to structured systems design. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
22. Pressman, R. (1997). Software engineering-A practitioner's approach. New York: McGraw-Hill.
23. Rahayu, J., Chang, E., Dillon, T., & Taniar, D. (2001). Performance evaluation of the object-relational transformation methodology. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 38, 3 (pp. 265-3000).
24. Rational Software White Paper, Mapping Objects to Data Models with the UML.
25. Rumbaugh, J., Blaha, M., Premerlani, W., Eddy, F., & Lorensen, W. (1991). Object-oriented modeling and design. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
26. Rumbaugh, J., Jacobson, I., & Booch, G. (1999). The Unified Modeling Language reference manual. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
27. Sun Microsystems (2001). Enterprise Java Beans specification, version 2.0. On the World Wide Web: http://www.java.sun.com
28. Sun Microsystems (2002). Java data objects specification, version 1.0. On the World Wide Web: http://www.java.sun.com
29. Tong, L., Li, X., & Ma, Y. (2002). Research of object-oriented data management methodology based on relational data model. Mini-Micro Systems, 23, 4 (pp. 500-504).
30. Yourdon, E. (1988). Modern structured analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.