Gaiku: Generating Haiku with Word Associations Norms

NAACL HLT 2009 - Computational Approaches to Linguistic Creativity, Proceedings of the Workshop

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 32-39

  Netzer, Yael ^a   Gabay, David ^a   Goldberg, Yoav ^a   Elhadad, Michael ^a  

^a BEN GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL CREATIVITIES; EXPERIMENT CONFIRM; KNOWLEDGE SOURCES; LEXICAL ASSOCIATIONS; LEXICAL CHAIN; LEXICAL KNOWLEDGE; LEXICAL KNOWLEDGE BASE; SYSTEMATICITY; WORD-ASSOCIATION; WORDNET;

ONTOLOGY;

EID: 85189135340     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. D.G. Blasko and D.W. Merski. 1998. Haiku poetry and metaphorical thought: An invention to interdisciplinary study. Creativity Research Journal, 11.
2. M.A. Boden. 1998. Creativity and artificial intelligence. Artificial Intelligence, 103(1–2).
3. F. de Saussure, C. Bally, A. Riedlinger, and A. Sechehaye. 1949. Cours de linguistique generale. Payot, Paris.
4. B. Díaz-Agudo, P. Gervás, and P. A. González-Calero. 2002. Poetry generation in COLIBRI. In Proc. of EC-CBR.
5. W. Duch and M. Pilichowski. 2007. Experiments with computational creativity. Neural Information Processing, Letters and Reviews, 11(3).
6. P. Gervas. 2001. An expert system for the composition of formal Spanish poetry. Journal of Knowledge-Based Systems, 14.
7. R. Gilbert and J. Yoneoka. 2000. From 5-7-5 to 8-8-8: An investigation of Japanese Haiku metrics and implications for English Haiku. Language Issues: Journal of the Foreign Language Education Center.
8. D. Hardcastle. 2007. Cryptic crossword clues: Generating text with a hidden meaning BBKCS-07-04. Technical report, Birkbeck College, London.
9. J. Kerouac. 2004. Book of Haikus. Enitharmon Press.
10. H.M. Manurung, G. Ritchie, and H. Thompson. 2000. Towards a computational model of poetry generation. In Proc. of the AISB’00.
11. H.M. Manurung. 2003. An evolutionary algorithm approach to poetry generation. Ph.D. thesis, University of Edinburgh.
12. S.A. Mendick. 1969. The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review.
13. N. Montfort. 2006. Natural language generation and narrative variation in interactive fiction. In Proc. of Computational Aesthetics Workshop at AAAI 2006, Boston.
14. J. Morris and G. Hirst. 1991. Lexical cohesion computed by thesaural relations as an indicator of the structure of text. Computational Linguistics, 17.
15. D.L. Nelson, C.L. Mcevoy, and T.A. Schreiber. 1998. The University of South Florida Word Association, Rhyme, and Word Fragment Norms. http://www.usf.edu/FreeAssociation/.
16. T. Pedersen, S. Patwardhan, and J. Michelizzi. 2004. Wordnet::similarity - measuring the relatedness of concepts. In HLT-NAACL 2004: Demonstrations.
17. G. Ritchie. 2001. Assessing creativity. In Proc. of AISB’01 Symposium.
18. G. Ritchie. 2006. The transformational creativity hypothesis. New Generation Computing, 24.
19. O. Rubinsten, D. Anaki, A. Henik, S. Drori, and Y. Faran. 2005. Free association norms in the Hebrew language. Word Norms in Hebrew. (In Hebrew).
20. A. Sinopalnikova and P. Smrz. 2004. Word association thesaurus as a resource for extending semantic networks. In Communications in Computing.
21. N. Tosa, H. Obara, and M. Minoh. 2008. Hitch haiku: An interactive supporting system for composing haiku poem. In Proc. of the 7th International Conference on Entertainment Computing.
22. M. Tsan Wong and A. Hon Wai Chun. 2008. Automatic Haiku generation using vsm. In Proc. of ACACOS’08, April.