Phi-Agree and Theta-Related Case

Phi Theory: Phi-Features across Modules and Interfaces

Volumn , Issue , 2023, Pages 83-129

  Řezáč, Milan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE NANTES   (France)

Author keywords

framework; functional; idiosyncratic; internal; relationship

Indexed keywords

EID: 85188410803     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780199213764.003.0004     Document Type: Chapter

References (126)

1. Abels, K. (2003). ‘Successive cyclicity, anti-locality, and adposition stranding.' Doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut.
2. Adger, D., and D. Harbour (2007). ‘Syntax and syncretisms of the Person-Case Constraint,' Syntax 10: 2-37.
3. Agirretxe, J. L., M. Lersundi, and O. Olaetxea (1998). Pasaiako hizkera. Pasaia:Pasaiako Udala.
4. Albizu, P. (1997). ‘Generalized Person-Case Constraint: A case for a syntax-driven inflectional morphology,' in M. Uribe-Etxebarria and A. Mendikoetxea (eds.), Theoretical Issues on the Morphology-Syntax Interface [Supplements of Anuario del Seminario de Filología Vasca “Julio de Urquijo” 15] Donostia: Gipuzkoako Foru Aldundia/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea, 1-33.
5. Albizu, P. (2002). ‘Basque verbal morphology: Redefining cases,' in P. Goenaga and J. A. Lakarra (eds.), Erramu Boneta: Festschrift for Rudolf P. G. de Rijk. Bilbo: Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea. 1-19.
6. Albizu, P. and L. Eguren (2000). ‘Ergative displacement in Basque,' in W. U. Drexler et al. (eds.), Morphological analysis in comparison [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 201]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1-25.
7. Albizu, P. and B. Fernández (2002). Datives’ intervention effect on ergativity in Basque. Ms., University of the Basque Country (UPV-EHU).
8. Anagnostopoulou, E. (1999). ‘Conditions on Clitic Doubling in Greek,' in H. van Riemsdijk (ed.), Clitics in the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 762-98.
9. Anagnostopoulou, E. (2003). The Syntax of Ditransitives: Evidence from Clitics. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.
10. Anand, P., and A. Nevins (forthcoming). ‘Some ergative subjects don’t reconstruct,' in A. Johns, D. Massam, and J. Ndayiragije (eds.), Ergativity: Emerging issues. Dordrecht:Kluwer, 3-27.
11. Artiagoitia, X. (2001a). ‘Seemingly ergative and ergatively seeming,' in J. Herschensohn, E. Mallén, and K. Zagona (eds.), Features and interfaces in Romance: Essays in honor of Heles Contreras. Amsterdam, John Benjamins, 1-22.
12. Artiagoitia, X. (2001b). ‘Irudiak eta emaileak.' Ms., University of the Basque Country (UPVEHU), Vitoria-Gasteiz.
13. Azkue, R. M. de. (1923[1969]). Morfología vasca, vol. I. Bilbo: La Gran Enciclopedia Vasca.
14. Azkue, R. M. de. (1924). Morfología vasca, vol. II. Bilbo: La Gran Enciclopedia Vasca.
15. Azkue, R. M. de. (1925[1969]). Morfología vasca, vol. III. Bilbo: La Gran Enciclopedia Vasca.
16. Béjar, S. (2003). ‘Phi-syntax: A theory of agreement.' Doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto.
17. Béjar, S. and M. Řezáč (2003). ‘Person licensing and the derivation of PCC effects,' in A. T. Pérez-Leroux and Y. Roberge (eds.), Romance Linguistics: Theory and acquisition [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 244]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 49-62.
18. Béjar, S. (2004). ‘Cyclic Agree.' Ms., University of Toronto and McGill University. Paper presented at GLOW27, Thessaloniki.
19. Belletti, A., and L. Rizzi (1988). ‘Psych-verbs and the theta theory,' Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6: 291-352.
20. Bhatt, R. (2006). ‘Long distance agreement in Hindi-Urdu,' Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 23: 757-807.
21. Bickel, B., and Y. P. Yādava (2000). ‘A fresh look at grammatical relations in Indo-Aryan,' Lingua 110: 343-73.
22. Bleam, T. M. (1999). ‘Leísta Spanish and the syntax of clitic doubling.' Doctoral dissertation, University of Delaware.
23. Bobaljik, J. D. (1993). ‘Ergativity and ergative unergatives,' in C. Phillips (ed.), Papers on Case and Agreement II [MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 19]. Cambridge, MA:MITWPL, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT, 45-88.
24. Bobaljik, J. D. and P. Branigan (2006). ‘Eccentric agreement andmultiple Case checking,' in A. Johns, D. Massam, and J. Ndayiragije (eds.), Ergativity: Emerging Issues. Dordrecht:Kluwer. 44-77.
25. Bobaljik, J. D. and S.Wurmbrand (2001). ‘Notes on agreement in Itelmen,' Linguistic Discovery 1.1: 205-19.
26. Boeckx, C. (1999). ‘Quirky Agreement,' Studia Linguistica 54: 354-80.
27. Boeckx, C. (2004). ‘Long-distance agreement in Hindi: Some theoretical implications,' Studia Linguistica 58: 23-36.
28. Bonet, E. (1991). ‘Morphology after syntax: Pronominal clitics in Romance.' Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
29. Bošković, Ž. (1997). The Syntax of Nonfinite Complementation. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
30. Branigan, P., and M. MacKenzie (2002). ‘Altruism, A-bar movement and object agreement in Innu-aimûn,' Linguistic Inquiry 33: 385-408.
31. Cardinaletti, A., and M. Starke (1999). ‘The typology of structural deficiency,' in H. van Riemsdijk (ed.), Clitics in the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 145-233.
32. Cardona, G. (1965). A Gujarati Reference Grammar. Philadelphia: The University of Pennsylvania Press.
33. Carstens, V. (2001). ‘Multiple agreement and Case deletion: Against (ê-)incompleteness,' Syntax 4: 147-63.
34. Carstens, V. (2003). ‘Rethinking complementizer agreement: Agree with a Case-checked goal,' Linguistic Inquiry 34: 393-412.
35. Carstens, V. (2005). ‘Agree and EPP in Bantu,' Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 23: 219-79.
36. Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of Language. New York: Praeger.
37. Chomsky, N. (1995). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
38. Chomsky, N. (2000). ‘Minimalist inquiries: The framework,' in R. Martin, D. Michaels, and J. Uriagereka (eds.), Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 89-156.
39. Chomsky, N. (2001). ‘Derivation by phase,' in M. Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 1-52.
40. Comrie, B. (1984). ‘Reflections on verb agreement in Hindi and related languages,' Linguistics 22: 857-64.
41. Corbett, G. G. (1998). ‘Morphology and agreement,' in: A. Spencer and A.M. Zwicky (eds.), The Handbook of Morphology. Oxford: Blackwell, 191-205.
42. Corbett, G. G. (2003). ‘Agreement: The range of the phenomenon and the principles of the Surrey database of agreement,' Transactions of the Philological Society 101: 155-202.
43. Davison, A. (2004). ‘Non-nominative subjects in Hindi-Urdu: VP structure and Case parameters,' in P. Bhaskararao and K. V. Subbarao (eds.), Non-nominative Subjects [Typological Studies in Language 60], vol. 1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 71-98.
44. Deo, A., and S. Devyani (2002). ‘Typological variation in the ergative morphology of Indo-Aryan languages.' Ms., Stanford University.
45. Dobrovie-Sorin, C. (1998). ‘Impersonal se constructions in Romance and the passivization of unergatives,' Linguistic Inquiry 29: 399-427.
46. Elordieta, A. (2001). ‘Verb movement and constituent permutation in Basque.' [LOT dissertation 47.] Utrecht: LOT.
47. Fernández, B. (2001). ‘Absolutibo komunztaduradun ergatiboak, absolutibo komunztaduradun datiboak: Ergatiboaren Lekualdatzetik Datiboaren Lekualdatzera,' in B. Fernández and P. Albizu (eds.), Kasu eta komunztaduraren gainean. On Case and Agreement. Bilbo: Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea. 147-65.
48. Fernández, B. (2002). ‘Komunztadura Bikoitza eta Lekualdatzea.' Ms., University of the Basque Country (EHU-UPV), Vitoria-Gasteiz.
49. Fernández, B. (2004). ‘Gustatzen nau gustatzen dizu: aditz laguntzaile eta komunztadura bitxiak perpaus ez-akusatiboetan,' in P. Albizu and B. Fernández (eds.), Euskal gramatika XXI. mendearen atarian: Arazo zaharrak, azterbide berriak. Arabako Foru Aldundia. 87-112.
50. Fernández, B. and P. Albizu (2000). ‘Ergative displacement and the division of labour between syntax and morphology,' in J. Boyle and A. Okrent (eds.), Chicago Linguistic Society 36, volume 2: The Panels. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. 103-17.
51. Fernández, B. and M. Ezeizabarrena (2001). ‘Itsasaldeko solezismoa, Datiboaren Lekualdatzearen argipean,' Euskaltzaindiaren Nazioarteko XV Biltzarra, P Lafiterren Sortzearen Mendemuga. Baiona: Euskaltzaindia and Iker.
52. Fraile Ugalde, I., and A. Fraile Ugalde (1996). Oiartzungo hizkera. Oiartzun:Oiartzungo Udala-Mugarri.
53. Gómez, R., and K. Sainz (1995). ‘On the origin of the finite forms of the Basque verb,' in J. I. Hualde, J. A. Lakarra, and R. L. Trask (eds.), Towards a History of the Basque Language. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 235-73.
54. Gutiérrez-Rexach, J. (1999). ‘The formal semantics of clitic doubling,' Journal of Semantics 16: 315-80.
55. Hale, K., and S. J. Keyser (1993). ‘On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations,' in K. Hale and S. J. Keyser (eds.), The view from Building 20. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 53-109.
56. Harley, H., and E. Ritter (2002). ‘Person and number in pronouns: A featuregeometric analysis,' Language 78: 482-526.
57. Harris, A. (1981). Georgian Syntax: A Study in Relational Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
58. Hoekstra, E., and C. Smits (1998). ‘Everything you ever wanted to know about complementizer agreement.' Ms., Fryske Akademy and Meertens Institute.
59. Holmberg, A., and P. Hróarsdóttir (2003). ‘Agreement and movement in Icelandic raising constructions,' Lingua 113: 997-1019.
60. Hualde, J. I., G. Elordieta, and A. Elordieta (1994). The Basque Dialect of Lekeitio [Supplements of Anuario del Seminario de Filología Vasca “Julio de Urquijo” 34]. Bilbao and Donostia: Universidad del País Vasco and Diputación Foral de Gipuzkoa.
61. Jelinek, E. (1984). ‘Empty categories, Case, and configurationality,' Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 2: 39-76.
62. Joppen, S., and D. Wunderlich (1995). ‘Argument linking in Basque,' Lingua 97: 123-69.
63. Jouitteau, M., and M. Řezáč (2006). ‘Deriving the complementarity principle: relativized minimality in Breton agreement,' Lingua 116: 1915-45.
64. Kayne, R. S. (2000). Parameters and Universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
65. Kinyalolo, K. K. W. (1991). ‘Syntactic dependencies and the Spec-head agreement hypothesis in Kilega.' Doctoral dissertation, UCLA.
66. Kitahara, H. (1997). Elementary Operations and Optimal Derivations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
67. Koppen, M. van (2005). ‘One probe-Two goals: Aspects of agreement in Dutch dialects’ [LOT dissertation 105]. Utrecht: LOT
68. Lafitte, P. (1979 [1995]). Grammaire Basque (Navarro-Labourdin littéraire). Donostia:Elkar.
69. Lafon, R. (1944 [1980]). Le système du verbe basque au XVIe siècle. Baiona: Elkar.
70. Lafon, R. (1954 [1999]). ‘Comportement syntactique, structure et diathese du verbe basque,' Bulletin de la Société Linguistique de Paris 50: 190-220. Reprinted in: Vasconiana (Iker 11). Bilbao: Euskaltzaindia, 529-55.
71. Lafon, R. (1955 [1999]). ‘Remarques complémentaires sur la structure du verbe basque,' Bulletin de la Société Linguistique de Paris. 50: 190-220. Reprinted in: Vasconiana (Iker 11). Bilbao: Euskaltzaindia, 329-55.
72. Lafon, R. (1961 [1999]). ‘Sur les formes verbales basques qui contiennent un indice datif,' Bulletin de la Société Linguistique de Paris 56: 139-62. Reprinted in: Vasconiana (Iker 11). Bilbao: Euskaltzaindia, 411-30.
73. Laka, I. (1993). ‘The structure of inflection: A case study in X0 syntax,' in J. I. Hualde and J. Ortiz de Urbina (eds.), Generative Studies in Basque Linguistics. Amsterdam:John Benjamins. 21-70.
74. Laka, I. (2000). ‘Theta-blind Case: Burzio’s generalization and its image in the mirror,' in E. Reuland (ed.), Arguments and Case: Explaining Burzio’s Generalization. Amsterdam:John Benjamins. 103-29.
75. Landau, I. (2000). Elements of Control: Structure and Meaning in Infinitival Constructions. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
76. Lasnik, H. (1999). Minimalist Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell.
77. Legate, J. A. (2002). ‘Warlpiri: Theoretical implications.' Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
78. Legate, J. A. (2003). ‘Phases and cyclic agreement.' Ms., Yale University.
79. Legate, J. A. (2006). ‘Split absolutive,' in A. Johns, D. Massam, and J. Ndayiragije (eds.), Ergativity: Emerging Issues. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
80. Magier, D. (1983). ‘Components of ergativity in Marwari,' Chicago Linguistic Society 19: 244-55.
81. Mahajan, A. K. (1989). ‘Agreement and agreement phrases,' in I. Laka and A. K. Mahajan (eds.), Functional Heads and Clausal Structure [MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 10]. Cambridge, MA: MITWPL, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT, 217-52.
82. McGinnis, M. (1998a). ‘Locality in A-movement.' Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
83. McGinnis, M. (1998b). ‘Locality and inert Case,' in P. Tamanji and K. Kusumoto (eds.), NELS 28. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts, GLSA, 267-81.
84. Mohanan, T. (1994). Argument Structure in Hindi. Stanford, CA: CSLI.
85. Moravcsik, E. (1978). ‘Agreement,' in J. H. Greenberg, C. A. Ferguson and E. A. Moravcsik (eds.), Universals of Human Language, vol. 4: Syntax. Stanford, CA.:Stanford University Press. 331-74.
86. O’Herin, B. (2002). Case and Agreement in Abaza. Dallas, TX: SIL International and University of Texas at Arlington.
87. Ormazabal, J., and J. Romero (2002). ‘Agreement restrictions.' Ms., University of the Basque Country (UPV-EHU) and University of Alcalá/Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.
88. Ortiz de Urbina, J. (1989). Parameters in the Grammar of Basque. Dordrecht: Foris.
89. Pesetsky, D. (1995). Zero Syntax: Experiencers and Cascades. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
90. Phillips, C. (1996). ‘Order and structure.' Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
91. Polinsky, M., and E. Potsdam (2001). ‘Long-distance agreement and topic in Tsez,' Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19: 583-646.
92. Potsdam, E., and J. Runner (2001). ‘Richard returns: Copy-raising and its implications,' in Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistic Society. CLS 37: 453-68.
93. Pylkkänen, L. (2003). ‘Introducing arguments.' Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
94. Rebuschi, G. (1982). Structure de l’Énoncé en Basque [L’Europe de la tradition orale 3]. Paris: Société d’études linguistiques et anthropologiques de France.
95. Reuland, E. (2001). ‘Primitives of binding,' Linguistic Inquiry 32: 439-92.
96. Řezáč, M. (2003). ‘The fine structure of cyclic Agree,' Syntax 6: 156-82.
97. Řezáč, M. (2004). ‘Elements of cyclic syntax: Agree and Merge.' Doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto. Available at http://ling.auf.net/lingBuzz/000050.
98. Rezáč, M. (2006). ‘Agreement displacement in Basque.' Ms., University of the Basque Country (UPV-EHU).
99. Rezáč, M. (2007). ‘Escaping the Person Case Constraint: Referential computation in the êsystem,' Linguistic Variation Yearbook 6: 97-138.
100. Richards, M. D. (2004). ‘Object Shift and scrambling in North and West Germanic:A case study in symmetrical syntax.' Doctoral dissertation, University of Cambridge.
101. Riemsdijk, H. van (1978). A Case Study of Syntactic Markedness: The Binding Nature of Prepositional Phrases. Lisse: The Peter de Ridder Press.
102. Sagarzazu, T. (1994). ‘Hondarribiko mintzairazko ikuspegiak: Larramendi, Bonaparte, Azkue,' in R. Gómez and J. A. Lakarra (eds.), Euskal Dialektologiako Kongresua (Donostia, 1991ko irailak 2-6) [Supplements of Anuario del Seminario de Filología Vasca “Julio de Urquijo” 28]. Donostia: Gipuzkoako Foru Aldundia, 589-631.
103. Schütze, C. T. (1997). ‘INFL in child and adult language: Agreement, Case, and licensing.' Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
104. Sigurðsson, H. Á. (1993). ‘Agreement as head visible feature government,' Studia Linguistica 47: 32-56.
105. Sigurðsson, H. Á. (1996). ‘Icelandic finite verb agreement,' Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 57: 1-46. Department of Scandinavian Languages, University of Lund.
106. Sigurðsson, H. Á. (2002). ‘To be an oblique subject: Russian versus Icelandic,' Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20: 691-724.
107. Steele, S. (1978). ‘Word order variation: A typological study,' in J. H. Greenberg, C. A. Ferguson and E. A. Moravcsik (eds.), Universals of Human Language, vol. 4: Syntax. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. 585-623.
108. Stowell, T. (1989). ‘Raising in Irish and the Projection Principle,' Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 7: 317-59.
109. Suñer, M. (1988). ‘The role of agreement in clitic-doubled constructions,' Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6: 391-434.
110. Taraldsen, K. T. (1995). ‘On agreement and nominative objects in Icelandic,' in H. Haider, S. Olsen, and S. Vikner (eds.), Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 307-27.
111. Trask, L. (1981). ‘Basque verbal morphology,' Iker 1: 285-304.
112. Trask, L. (2003). ‘The noun phrase: Nouns, determiners, and modifiers; pronouns and names,' in J. I. Hualde and J. Ortiz de Urbina (eds.), A Grammar of Basque. Berlin:Mouton de Gruyter. 92-134.
113. Uriagereka, J. (1995). ‘Aspects of clitic placement in western Romance,' Linguistic Inquiry 26: 79-123.
114. Uriagereka, J. (1999a). ‘Multiple spell-out,' in S. D. Epstein and N. Hornstein (eds.), Working Minimalism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 251-282.
115. Uriagereka, J. (1999b). ‘Minimal restrictions on Basque movement,' Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 17: 403-44.
116. Vogelaer, G. de, A. Neuckermans, and G. Vanden Wyngaerd (2002). ‘Complementizer agreement in the Flemish dialects,' in S. Barbiers, L. Cornips, and S. van der Kleij, (eds.), Syntactic Microvariation [Meertens Institute Electronic Publications in Linguistics 2]. Amsterdam: Meertens Instituut. 97-115.
117. Watanabe, A. (1996). Case Absorption and wh-Agreement. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
118. Woolford, E. (1997). ‘Four-way Case systems: Ergative, nominative, objective, and accusative,' Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 15: 181-227.
119. Woolford, E. (2006). ‘Lexical Case, inherent Case, and argument structure,' Linguistic Inquiry 37: 111-30.
120. Yrizar, P. de (1981). Contribución a la dialectología de la lengua vasca, 2 vols. Donostia:Gipuzkoako Aurrezki Kutxa Probintziala.
121. Yrizar, P. de (1991). Morfología del verbo auxiliar gipuzcoano, Estudio dialectológico, 2 vols.
122. Zarautz: Euskaltzaindia. (1992). Morfología del verbo auxiliar vizcaíno, Estudio dialectológico, 2 vols.
123. Zarautz: Euskaltzaindia. (1997). Morfología del verbo auxiliar labortano. Pamplona: Euskaltzaindia and Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea.
124. Zubizarretta, M. L. (1998). Prosody, Focus, and Word-order. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
125. Zwart, J.-W. (1997). Morphosyntax of Verb Movement: A Minimalist Approach to the Syntax of Dutch. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
126. Zwart, J.-W. (2001). ‘Syntax and phonological verb movement,' Syntax 4: 34-62.