Managing Uncertainty and Finality: The Function of the Criminal Trialn in Legal Inquiry

The Trial on Trial Volume 1: Truth and Due Process

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 121-145

  Jackson, John ^a  

^a QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY BELFAST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85187409858     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (50)

1. C Bradley, ‘The Exclusionary Rule in Germany’ (1983) 96 Harvard Law Revie1032
2. J Ashworth, ‘Exploring the Integrity Principle in Evidence and Procedure’, In P Mirfield and R Smith (eds), Essays for Colin Tapper (London, Butterworths, 2003) 107, 118-19.
3. P Mirfield, Silence, Confessions and Improperly Obtained Evidence (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1997).
4. J H Ely, Democracy and Distrust (Cambridge, Mass, Harvard University Press, 1980).
5. H Berman, Law and Revolution: The Formation of the Western Legal Tradition (Cambridge, Mass, Harvard University Press, 1983) 57-60.
6. M Damaska, ‘Rational and Irrational Proof Revisited’ (1997) 5 Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law 25.
7. J H Langbein, Prosecuting Crime in the Renaissance: England, Germany, France (Cambridge, Mass, Harvard University Press, 1974) 157
8. Torture and the Law of Proof: Europe and England in the Ancien Régime (Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1977) 5-8.
9. R Bartlett, Trial by Fire and Water: The Medieval Judicial Ordeal (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1986) 139.
10. B Shapiro, Beyond Reasonable Doubt and Probable Cause (Berkeley, University of California Press, 1991) 13-14.
11. B Russell, A History of Western Philosophy (London, Allen & Unwin, 1946), 641.
12. F Copleston, A History of Philosophy (New York, Doubleday, 1960) 6, 15.
13. G Gilbert, The Law of Evidence (Dublin, S Cotter 1754).
14. J Jackson, ‘Making Juries Accountable’ (2002) 50 American Journal of Comparative Law 477.
15. P Goodrich, Languages of Law: From Logics of Memory to Nomadic Masks (London, Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1991) 191
16. P Haldar, ‘The Evidencer’s Eye: Representations of Truth in the Laws of Evidence’ (1991)
17. J Jackson, ‘Law’s Truth, Lay Truth and Lawyer’s Truth: the Representation of Evidence in Adversary Trials’ (1992) 3 Law and Critique 29.
18. D Hay, ‘Property, Authority and the Criminal Law’, In D Hay, P Linebaugh, J G Rule, E P Thompson and C Winslow, Albion’s Fatal Tree: Crime and Society in Eighteenth Century England (London, Allen Lane, 1975).
19. J Hunter and K Cronin, Evidence, Advocacy and Trial Practice: A Criminal Trial Commentary (Sydney, Butterworths, 1995) 17.
20. D Nance, ‘The Best Evidence Principle’ (1988) 73 Iowa Law Review 227.
21. M Damaska, Evidence Law Adrift (New Haven, Yale University Press, 1997)
22. J B Thayer, A Preliminary Treatise on Evidence at the Common Law (Boston, Little Brown, 1898) 266, 509.
23. E J Imwinkelried, ‘The Worst Evidence Principle: The Best Hypothesis as to the Logical Structure of Evidence Law’, (1992) 46 University of Miami Law Review 1069.
24. E Morgan, ‘The Jury and the Exclusionary Rules of Evidence’ (1937) 4 University of Chicago Law Review 247.
25. M Damaska, ‘Free Proof and its Detractors’ (1995) 43 American Journal of Comparative Law 343, 352.
26. S Doran, ‘The Symbolic Function of the Summing-Up in the Criminal Trial:Can the Diplock Judgment Compensate’ (1991) 42 Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly 365
27. M Seigel, ‘A Pragmatic Critique of Modern Evidence Scholarship’ (1994) 88 Northwestern University Law Review 995.
28. S Bedford, The Faces of Justice: A Traveller’s Report (London, Collins, 1961).
29. B McKillop, ‘Readings and Hearings in French Criminal Justice: Five Cases in the Tribunal Correctionnel’ (1998) 46 American Journal of Comparative Law 757.
30. C Bradley, ‘The Exclusionary Rule in Germany’ (1983) 96 Harvard Law Review 1032 Damaska, above note 55, at 13-14.
31. M Damaska, ‘Of Hearsay and its Analogies’ (1992) 76 Minnesota Law Review 425
32. ‘Propensity Evidence in Continental Legal Systems’ (1994) 70 Chi-Kent Law Review 55.
33. L Farmer, ‘Notable Trials and the Criminal Law in Scotland and England 1900', In P Chassaigne
34. J-P Genet (eds), Droit et société en France et en Grande-Bretagne (XII-XX siècles).
35. D Oliver and G Drewry, Public Service Reforms: Issues of Accountability and Public Law (London, Pinter, 1996).
36. D S Greer, ‘Anything but the Truth The Reliability of Testimony in Criminal Trials’ (1971) 11British Journal of Criminology 131.
37. J Spencer and R Flin, Children’s Evidence (London, Blackstone, 1992)
38. L Ellison, The Adversarial Process and the Vulnerable Witness (Oxford, Clarendon, 2001).
39. B Scheck, P Neufeld and J Dwyer, Actual Innocence (New York, Doubleday, 1999). See also http://www.innocenceproject.org.
40. K Swedlow, ‘Don’t Believe Everything You Read: A Review of Modern “Post-Conviction”DNA Testing Statutes’ (2002) 38 California West Law Review 355.
41. P Roberts, ‘Double Jeopardy Law Reform: A Criminal Justice Commentary’ (2002) 65
42. R A Duff, Trials and Punishments (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1986).
43. S Richards, Philosophy and Sociology of Science (Oxford, Blackwell, 1987).
44. S Haack, ‘Disentangling Daubert: An Epistemological Study in Theory and Practice’ (2003) Science in the Law. Newsletter of the American Philosophical Association.
45. S Haack, ‘Disentangling Daubert: An Epistemological Study in Theory and Practice’ (2003) Science in the Law. Newsletter of the American Philosophical Association.
46. P Roberts, ‘Science, Experts and Criminal Justice’, In M McConville and G Wilson (eds), The Handbook of the Criminal Justice Process (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2002) 253.
47. M Redmayne, Expert Evidence and Criminal Justice (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 2001).
48. P Fennell, C Harding, N Jorg and B Swart, Criminal Justice in Europe: A Comparative Study (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1995).
49. B Barnes, D Bloor and J Henry, Scientific Knowledge: A Sociological Analysis (Chicago, Chicago University Press, 1996).
50. S Haack, ‘Inquiry and Advocacy, Fallibilism and Finality: Culture and Inference in Science and the law’ (2004)(forthcoming).