Specifying Aims and Limits for Restorative Justice: A ‘Making Amends’ Model?*

Restorative Justice and Criminal Justice: Competing or Reconcilable Paradigms?

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 21-41

  von Hirsch, Andrew ^a,b   Ashworth, Andrew ^c   Shearing, Clifford ^d,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^d AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^e UNIVERSITY OF THE WESTERN CAPE   (South Africa)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85187370846     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (18)

1. Bazemore, G (1999) ‘After Shaming, Whither Reintegration: Restorative Justice and Relational Rehabilitation’ in G Bazemore and L Walgrave (eds), Restorative Juvenile Justice: Repairing the Harm of Youth Crime (Criminal Justice Press, Monsey NY) 155-194.
2. Braithwaite, J (1999) ‘Restorative Justice: Assessing Optimistic and Pessimistic Accounts’ in M Tonry (ed), Crime and Justice: A Review of Research (Chicago University Press, Chicago) vol 25, 1-127.
3. Christie, N (1977) ‘Conflicts as Property’ 17 British Journal of Criminology 1-26.
4. Daly, K (2002) ‘Restorative Justice: The Real Story’ 4 Punishment and Society 55-79.
5. National Academy of Sciences, Panel on Research on Criminal Careers (1986) Criminal Careers and ‘Career Criminals’ (National Academy of Sciences, Washington DC) vol 1.
6. Pettit, P and Braithwaite, J (1993) ‘Not Just Deserts, Not Even in Sentencing’ 4 Current Issues in Criminal Justice 222-39.
7. Reprinted as ‘Republicanism in Sentencing: Recognition, Recompense and Reassurance’ in A von Hirsch and A Ashworth (eds), Principled Sentencing 317-30, this bibliography.
8. Roche, D (2001) Restorative Justice and Deliberative Accountability (Australian National University, Canberra). PhD Dissertation.
9. Strang, H, Barnes, G et al (1999) Experiments in Restorative Policing: A Progress Report on the Canberra Reintegrative Shaming Experiments (RISE) (Australian National University, Canberra).
10. Van Ness, D (1993) ‘New Wine and Old Wineskins: Four Challenges of Restorative Justice’ 4 Criminal Law Review 251-76.
11. von Hirsch, A (1985) Past of Future Crimes: Deservedness and Dangerousness in the Sentencing of Criminals (Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick NJ).
12. Van Ness, D (1993) Censure and Sanctions (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
13. Van Ness, D (1995) ‘Proportionality and Parsimony in American Sentencing Guidelines: The Minnesota and Oregon Standards’ in C Clarkson and R Morgan (eds), The Politics of Sentencing Reform (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
14. Van Ness, D (1998) ‘Desert and Previous Convictions’ in A von Hirsch and A Ashworth (eds), Principled Sentencing 191-97, this bibliography.
15. Van Ness, D (2001) ‘The Project of Sentencing Reform’ in M Tonry and R Frase (eds), Sentencing and Sanctions in Western Countries (Oxford University Press, New York) 405-20.
16. von Hirsch, A and Ashworth, A (1998) Principled Sentencing: Readings on Theory and Policy (Hart Publishing, Oxford).
17. Zedner, L (1994) ‘Reparation and Retribution: Are they Reconcilable?' 57 Modern Law Review 228-50.
18. Zehr, H (1990) Changing Lenses: A New Focus for Criminal Justice (Herald Press, Scottsdale PA).