The Rendition of Terrorist Suspects to the United States: Human Rights and the Limits of International Cooperation

Enforcing International Law Norms Against Terrorism

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 331-373

  Borelli, Silvia ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

^b BRITISH INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL AND COMPARATIVE LAW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85187363414     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (41)

1. RJ Goldstone and J Simpson, “Evaluating the Role of the International Criminal Court as a Legal Response to Terrorism”, (2003) 16 Harvard Human Rights Journal 13.
2. DF Vagts, “Which Courts Should Try Persons Accused of Terrorism?", (2003) 14 European Journal of International Law 313;
3. F Mégret, “Justice in Times of Violence”, (2003) 14 European Journal of International Law 327.
4. CM Pilgrim, “Terrorism in National and International Law”, (1990) 8 Dickinson Journal of International Law 147, at 157;
5. MP Scharf, “Defining Terrorism As The Peace Time Equivalent Of War Crimes: A Case Of Too Much Convergence Between International Humanitarian Law And International Criminal Law?, " (2001) 7 ILSA Journal of International and Comparative Law 391.
6. IA Shearer, Extradition in International Law (Manchester University Press, Manchester, 1971);
7. G Gilbert, Aspects of Extradition Law (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1991);
8. G Gilbert, Transnational Fugitive Offenders in International Law: Extradition and Other Mechanisms (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1998);
9. MC Bassiouni, International Extradition and World Public Order (Oceana, Sijthoff, 1974).
10. G von Glahn, Law Among Nations, 7th edn (Allyn and Bacon, Boston, 1996), at 249.
11. RS Phillips, “The political offence exception and terrorism: its place in the current extradition scheme and proposal for its future”, (1997) 15 Dickinson Journal of International Law 337.
12. E Muller-Rappard, “The European Response to International Terrorism”, in MC Bassiouni, Legal Responses to International Terrorism: US Procedural Aspects (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1988), at 385.
13. RY Jennings and A Watts (eds), Oppenheim’s International Law, 9th ed (Longman, London, 1992), at 107.
14. G Schwarzenberger, “The Problem of International Criminal Law”, (1950) 3 Current Legal Problems 263, at 272.
15. C Van den Wyngaert, “Applying the European Convention of Human Rights to Extradition: Opening Pandora’s Box?", (1990) 39 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 757;
16. JG Kester, “Some Myths of United States Extradition Law”, (1988) 76 Georgetown Law Journal 1441, at 1465-68;
17. P Michell, “English-Speaking Justice: Evolving Responses to Transnational Forcible Abduction After Alvarez-Machain”, (1996) 29 Cornell International Law Journal 383, at 436 ff;
18. J Dugard and C Van den Wyngaert, “Reconciling Extradition with Human Rights”, (1998) 92 American Journal of International Law 187.
19. T Vogler, “The Scope of Extradition within the European Convention of Human Rights”, in F Matscher and H Petzold (eds), Protecting Human Rights: the European Dimension. Studies in honour of Gérard J. Wiarda (Heymanns Verlag KG, Köln, 1988).
20. MC Bassiouni, International Extradition: United States Law and Practice, 4th edn (Oceana Publications, 2002).
21. WA Schabas, The Abolition of the Death Penalty in International Law, 3rd edition (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002).
22. RJ Beck and AC Arend, " ‘Don’t Tread on Us’: International Law and Forcible State Responses to Terrorism”, (1994) 12 Wisconsin International Law Journal 153, at 174-79.
23. EE Dickinson; “Jurisdiction Following Seizure or Arrest in Violation of International Law”, (1934) 28 American Journal of International Law 231;
24. F Morgenstern, “Jurisdiction in Seizures Effected in Violation of International Law”, (1952) 29 British Yearbook of International Law 265;
25. P O’Higgins, “Unlawful Seizure and Irregular Extradition”, (1960) 36 British Yearbook of International Law 279;
26. FA Mann, “Reflections on the Prosecution of Persons Abducted in Breach of International Law”, in Y Dinstein (ed), International Law at a Time of Perplexity (Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, 1988), at 407;
27. M Garcia Mora, “Criminal Jurisdiction of a State Over Fugitives Brought From a Foreign Country by Force or Fraud: a Comparative Study”, (1958) Indiana Law Journal 427;
28. D Kash, “Abduction of Terrorists in International Airspace and on the High Seas”, (1993) 8 Florida Journal of International Law 65.
29. J Semmelman, “Federal Courts, the Constitution, and the Rule of Non-Inquiry in International Extradition Proceedings”, (1991) 76 Cornell Law Review 1198
30. M Akehurst, “Custom as a Source of International Law”, (1974-75) British Yearbook of International Law 1, at 31-44;
31. P Haggenmacher, “Des deux elements du droit cotumier dans la pratique de la Cour Internationale”, (1985) 89 RGDIP 5;
32. I Brownlie, Principles of Public International Law, 5th edn (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1998), at 4-12;
33. O Elias, “The Nature of the Subjective Element in Customary International Law”, (1995) International and Comparative Law Quarterly 501;
34. M Mendelson, “The Formation of Customary International Law”, (1998) 272 RdC 155.
35. B Vitanyi, “Les positions doctrinales concernant le sens de la notion de ‘principes généraux de droit reconnus par les nations civilisées’ ", (1992) 86 RGDIP 48;
36. B Cheng, General Principles of Law as Applied by International Courts and Tribunals (Stevens and Sons, Ltd, London, 1953).
37. RJ Stark, “The Ker-Frisbie-Alvarez Doctrine: International Law, Due Process, and United States Sponsored Kidnapping of Foreign Nationals Abroad”, (1993) 9 Connecticut Journal of International Law 125.
38. M Halberstam, “In Defense of the Supreme Court Decision in Alvarez-Machain”, (1992) 86 American Journal of International Law 736.
39. S Wilske, Die völkerrechtswidrige Entführung und ihre Rechtsfolgen (Duncker and Humblot, Berlin, 2000)
40. D Pulkowski, (2001) 12 European Journal of International Law 1035.
41. MM Laflin, “Kidnapped Terrorists: Bringing International Criminals to Justice Through Irregular Rendition and Others Quasi-legal Options”, (2000) 26 Journal of Legislation 315.